| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 80, 2025
2025 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computer Applications and Artificial Intelligence (ACAAI 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Applications in Industry, Finance & AI Ethics | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20258004001 | |
| Published online | 16 December 2025 | |
Towards Trustworthy Explanations in Clinical AI: A Framework of Causal Screening and Clinical Constraints
School of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
* Corresponding author: jiangyi_2004@shu.edu.cn
The importance of artificial intelligence continues to increase in disease diagnosis and risk prediction. However, the clinically used prediction models based on AI nowadays are often established upon non- causal features, limiting their interpretability and trustworthiness among doctors. To address this issue, the Causal-Clinical Explainability (CCX) framework is put forward in this paper. In addition to the use of clinical prior knowledge for the purpose of guiding the selection of features, the framework also carries out causal discovery via the PC method for the elimination of wrongful associations. Through the double strategy mentioned above, the quality of the causal-clinical feature subsets for the establishment of any following prediction models can be ensured. Experiment results demonstrate that the CCX framework outperforms baseline models both on prediction performance and robustness. The paper offers an effective approach for the development of clinical decision support systems and provides a feasible solution for the promotion of the usage of AI for clinical work under practical situations.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

