EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 81 (2026) ITM Web Conf., 81 (2026) 01024 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 81, 2026
International Conference on Emerging Technologies for Multidisciplinary Innovation and Sustainability (ETMIS 2025)
Article Number 01024
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268101024
Published online 23 January 2026
  1. N. Mulani, S. Shete, A. Korade, T. Ransing, M. Bangar, AI- and ML-driven agricultural auction system, 12 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  2. Q. He, H. Zhao, Y. Feng, Z. Wang, Z. Ning, T. Luo, Edge-computing based smart agricultural supply chain framework using auction strategies and fuzzy neural models (2024) [Google Scholar]
  3. V.B. O., S. Sebastian, Study on agricultural auction mechanisms, 6 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Srikanth, R.N.V.J. Mohan, M. Chandra Naik, Peer-to-peer auction approach with hybrid technologies for smallholder farmers to manage demand and supply, 3 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. Shi, C. de Laat, P. Grosso, Z. Zhao, Survey of blockchain-auction integration: applications, advantages, and challenges (2022) [Google Scholar]
  6. R.D.G. Njiru, C. Dong, F. Appel, A. Balmann, Strategic bidding patterns in agricultural land rental auctions via reinforcement learning in an agent-based model (2025) [Google Scholar]
  7. D.W. Untari, S. Vellema, Inclusion in farmer-led auction organisations: comparative analysis in Javanese chilli markets (2022) [Google Scholar]
  8. M.R. Bhardwaj, B. Ahmed, P. Diwakar, Deep-learning based fair and cost-optimal agricultural input auctions for farmer collectives (2023) [Google Scholar]
  9. T.A. Shaikh, W.A. Mir, T. Rasool et al., Machine learning for smart agriculture and precision farming, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 29, 4557–4597 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  10. C.S. Kumar, R.V. Anand, Secure and energy-efficient routing algorithm review for IoT-enabled smart agricultural systems, J. Biosyst. Eng., 48, 339–354 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Mittelmann, S. Bouveret, L. Perrussel, A study on auction representation and logical reasoning, Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst., 36, article 20 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Zhang, W.N. Hao, X.H. Yu et al., Multi-objective evolutionary fuzzy model with dynamic data and rule pools for neural network interpretation, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 25, 575–600 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Li, Z. Sha, T. Sun, Influence of internet access among rural households on shared prosperity: insights from Chinese social survey data, Soc. Indic. Res., 170, 797–823 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Liu, Trade-off between incentives and cost efficiency in conservation auctions: evidence from multiple reverse-auction awards, Environ. Resour. Econ., 78, 417–451 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Feng, D. Mei, H. Zhao, Deep-learning powered auction approach for smart agri supply-chain operations, Appl. Soft Comput., 149, article 111009 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Seifert, S. Huettel, Examining the possibility of winner's curse in land auctions for agriculture, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 50, 1140–1177 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Remya, Soil-quality monitoring for sustainable farming using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference approach, Soft Comput., 26, 13119–13132 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  18. D.P. Acharjya, R. Rathi, Smart-farming crop recognition through fuzzy-rough sets and real-coded GA, Multimed. Tools Appl., 81, 35117–35142 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Ramana, R. Aluvala, M.R. Kumar et al., Deep-neural-network and IoT-based classification of leaf diseases in precision agriculture, J. Circuits Syst. Comp., 31, 2240004 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  20. G.I. Shepelev, Impact of different defuzzification strategies when evaluating fuzzy alternatives, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 49, 364–370 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  21. V.R.R. Kolipaka, A. Namburu, Two-stage meta-heuristic classifier architecture for automated prediction of crop yields, Multimed. Tools Appl. (2023) [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Wang, Performance analysis of wireless networks under edge-computing frameworks, Wirel. Netw., 28, 3665–3676 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  23. N.S. Kaya, S. Pacci, I. Demirag Turan et al., Soil erosion risk assessment: comparison between GIS-based fuzzy-AHP and ANN approaches, Rend. Lincei, 34, 1089–1104 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Zhang, Z.Y. Huang, W. Liu et al., CNN- and LSTM-based prediction of weather radar echoes for sustainable e-agriculture, J. Clean. Prod., 298, 126776 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  25. S.V. Oprea, A. Bâra, IoT-oriented Edge-Fog-Cloud computing design for smart meter datasets, Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl., 16, 818–845 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Rajkovic, A.M. Jeromela, L. Pezo et al., Forecasting winter rapeseed production quality via ANN and random-forest models, Agronomy (Basel), 12, 58 (2022) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.