Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 87, 2026
2nd International Conference on Computing Paradigms (ICCP-2026)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268701007
Published online 30 June 2026
  1. S. Ceschia, L. Di Gaspero, and A. Schaerf, “Educational timetabling: problems, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results,” Computers & Operations Research (preprint / arXiv), Jan. 2022 [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Siew, G. Kendall, and colleagues, “A survey of solution methodologies for exam timetabling,” arXiv / technical report, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Muklason, “Generic university examination timetabling system with hill-climbing and hybrid heuristics,” Procedia / ScienceDirect, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  4. C. W. Fong, “University examination timetabling using a hybrid black-box heuristic,” Journal of Informatics and Innovation in Virtualization (JOIV), 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. E. S. K. Siew, S. N. Sze, S. L. Goh, M. Hossin, and K. L. Chiew, “A survey of solution methodologies for exam timetabling,” Technical Report / arXiv, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. B. Hassan, S. A. Barakat, and Q. I. Sarhan, “Survey on serverless computing,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 10, Art. no. 39, 2021 [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Li et al., “The Serverless Computing Survey: A Technical Primer for Research and Practice,” ACM / Communications / survey (2022). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Wen, et al., “Rise of the planet of serverless computing: A systematic literature review,” ACM / TOSEM (2023). [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Mohanty et al., “FAAS: Optimizing loop-based applications for serverless,” (system / arXiv / preprint), 2024 — useful for function-level optimizations and cold-start / packing strategies. [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Ship, E. Shindin, C. Wang, et al., “Optimizing simultaneous autoscaling for serverless cloud computing,” arXiv (2023) — good for autoscaling/resource-allocation theory in serverless platforms [Google Scholar]
  11. H. B. Hassan, S. A. Barakat, and Q. I. Sarhan, “Survey on serverless computing,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 10, Art. no. 39, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. K. Ozturk, “Exam scheduling under pandemic conditions: A multi-objective MIP and heuristic approach,” ScienceDirect / Elsevier, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Bassimir, “On the computation of robust examination timetables,” Journal of Scheduling, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Spillner, “Snafu: Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) runtime design and implementation,” in Proc. IEEE/ACM SEAMS, 2017, pp. 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Lemos, P. T. Monteiro, and I. Lynce, “University course timetabling with MaxSAT,” Journal of Scheduling, vol. 25, no. 3, 2022. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.