| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2025
International Conference on Computer Science and Electronic Information Technology (CSEIT 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01037 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Deep Learning and Reinforcement Learning – Theories and Applications | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20257801037 | |
| Published online | 08 September 2025 | |
A Comparative Study of Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithms for Dynamic Filter and Effect Recommendations on Tiktok
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, 61820, USA
This study assesses how three benchmark Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) methods—ε-greedy, Upper Confidence Bound (UCB), and Thompson sampling—perform in dynamically recommending filters and effects for short-video platforms. An experiment was configured using real user engagement metrics (likes, shares, views), enabling each algorithm to incrementally build reward estimates and adapt to evolving content trends. The study examines the dual impact of striking a diversity–satisfaction equilibrium on recommendation effect identification. Results suggest that moderate exploration strategies yield the highest effectiveness by enabling the discovery of emerging, underused effects without compromising user satisfaction. A hybrid MAB model is then proposed, in which exploration adjusters are reactive to performance metrics, allowing prompt responses to content trends while maintaining recommendation quality. Finally, practical aspects of deploying these models—such as latency, scalability, and fairness—are discussed, along with concrete recommendations for designing adaptive social media recommendation systems. By integrating conceptual and practical approaches, this study demonstrates how MAB algorithms can achieve both content discovery and reliability.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

