| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 80, 2025
2025 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computer Applications and Artificial Intelligence (ACAAI 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01018 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Machine Learning & Deep Learning Algorithms | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20258001018 | |
| Published online | 16 December 2025 | |
Trade-offs in Few-shot Image Generation: Stability, Fidelity, and Adaptability in Data-Efficient GANs
Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of California, Davis, United States
* Corresponding author: lxiqi@ucdavis.edu
This study presents a comparative analysis of data-efficient GANs, evaluating training stability, output fidelity, and cross-domain adaptability under few-shot conditions. Our findings reveal a distinct trade- off between performance and specialization. StyleGAN2-ADA achieves strong stability and fidelity with small datasets. D3T-GAN performs best when the source and target domains share similar structures. WeditGAN and DEff-GAN improve controllability and diversity, but they need careful parameter tuning. Smoothness Regularization increases consistency, though it may reduce variation. LDM-GAN offers semantic richness and diversity, but it often oversmooths and struggles with very limited data. Model choice depends on the task. StyleGAN2-ADA is best for general small-sample fidelity. D3T-GAN is suited for domain transfer. LDM-GAN works well when diversity is the priority. Future work should prioritize hybrid frameworks, combining augmentation and transfer learning for more robust performance. Progress will also depend on better evaluation metrics and reproducible benchmarks. These steps mark the most promising path for robust and practical few-shot image generation.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

