| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 80, 2025
2025 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computer Applications and Artificial Intelligence (ACAAI 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Reinforcement Learning, Bandits & Optimization | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20258002005 | |
| Published online | 16 December 2025 | |
Multi-Armed Bandits and Their Classical Algorithms: Strengths and Limitations
School of Advanced Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, 215000, Suzhou, China
* Corresponding author: Sichen.Wu24@student.xjtlu.edu.cn
Multi-armed Bandits (MAB), which is the short form for multi- armed bandit, is playing a significant role in varied spaces including online advertising, recommendation system, clinical trials and medical decision- making and even in 5G. The model aims to balance “choosing the option with the highest reward known so far” and “exploring the options unknown”. At last, it will reflect the results by a coefficient called regret. It is sometimes not suitable to some special situations. This article shows three of its classical algorithms: Explore Then Commit (ETC), Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) and Thompson Sampling (TS). ETC separates exploitation and commitments into two single parts but it will produce more regrets comparing to the other two algorithms. UCB selects arms based on the “average reward + upper confidence bound” metrics. It is one of the most popular algorithms. TS models uncertainty by leveraging Bayesian updates and random sampling. However, it is much harder than the others. They have different advantages and disadvantages. In summary, MAB has good application scenarios if people make good use of its different types of algorithms.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

