| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 88, 2026
The 2026 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Computer Science (AIBDCS 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01013 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Computer Science | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268801013 | |
| Published online | 27 July 2026 | |
Sensitivity Boundaries of Image Segmentation Models: Stress Tests of UniverSeg and IRIS on Non-Standard Images
Computer Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong - Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, China
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Universal medical image segmentation models based on In-Context Learning (ICL), like UniverSeg and IRIS, which is In-context Reference Image guided Segmentation, can adjust to new tasks without many labeled datasets. However, the robustness boundaries of these models when dealing with non-standard images in real images, such as low-quality images or those with offset, remain unclear. The study uses a testing method called a data probing approach. Blur is added to the pictures or items are moved around a bit to see how well the models work. Research wants to see the performance of these models when the example pictures are not perfect, which is in daily use. The research shows that the performance of the models is related to the clarity and offset of examples. The UniverSeg model felt difficult when items moved more than 10 pixels and the Gaussian blur radius exceeded 10. The IRIS model is better at working with pictures but it has trouble when the pictures are moved, reaching 40 pixels. This study shows that the models used now are not perfect and need improvement. This report helps doctors and engineers to judge whether ICL models are supposed to be used in working situations.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

