| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 88, 2026
The 2026 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Computer Science (AIBDCS 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01024 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Computer Science | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268801024 | |
| Published online | 27 July 2026 | |
Comparative Analysis of Large Language Model in Assisting Cross-domain Rumor Detection
International School of Technology, Henan University, 450046 Zhengzhou, China
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Rumors have certain harmfulness and variability, but cross-domain rumor detection faces challenges such as the scarcity of target domain annotation and the sensitivity of domain offset. Large language model (LLM) provides a new solution for this task with its extensive general knowledge and semantic understanding ability. This paper systematically reviews three cross-domain rumor detection methods driven by LLM, namely, the MONTROSE method based on data synthesis, the T²ARD method based on pseudo-label annotation, and the RAEmoLLM method based on retrieval enhancement. The specific role of LLM in cross-domain applications is analyzed according to its generation ability, pseudo-label annotation ability and context reasoning ability. This paper also compares the similarities and differences of the three methods in terms of call timing, computational overhead, domain adaptation mechanism, and it discusses the challenges faced by the current methods in terms of credibility. This paper aims to provide a theoretical reference for the construction of a lighter and more reliable cross-domain rumor detection system.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

