Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 23, 2018
XLVIII Seminar of Applied Mathematics
Article Number 00031
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20182300031
Published online 07 November 2018
  1. Z. Mikulski, Zarys hydrografii Polski (PWN, Warszawa, 1963) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Ozga-Zielińska, J. Brzeziński, Hydrologia stosowana (PWN, Warszawa 1997) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Byczkowski, Hydrologia (1999) [Google Scholar]
  4. E.M. Shaw, Hydrology in practice (Spoon Press, 1983) [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Kaznowska, Ł. Chudy, Woda-Środ.-Ob. Wiej. 6, 2 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Hannaford, T. Marsh, Intern. J. of Clim. 28, 1325-1338 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Doll, K. Fiedler, J. Zhang, Hydr. and Earth Sys. Sci., 13, 2413-2431 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Belletti, S. Dufour, H. Piegay, Adv. in Geosci. 37, 57-71 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Siwek, Ann. UMCS sec. B LXXI, 2, 29-40 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Jokiel, Ac. Univer. Lodz. F. Geogr. Ph. 8, 99-129 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Bartczak, Pr. Geogr. IGiPZ PAN 209, 164 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Nowicka, Pr. i St. Geogr. 43, 11-24 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Kijowska, Monit. Środ. Przyr. 12, 59-68 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. R.M. Vogel, N.M. Fennessey, Wat. Res. Bull. 31, 6, 1029-1039 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A.K. Fleig, L.N. Tallasken, H. Hisdal, S. Demuth, Hydr. and Earth Sys. Sci. 10, 535-552 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. U.K. Mandal. Studies in Low and Flood Flow Estimation for Irish River Catchments, PhD thesis, Nat. Univ. of Ireland (2012) [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Alfieri, P. Salamon, A. Bianchi, J. Neal, P. Bates, L. Feyen, Hydr. Proc. 28, 13 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Siwek, Floods in upper Wieprz catchment – occurrence and dynamics, PhD thesis, Dep. of Hydr., M. Curie-Sklodowska Univ., Lublin (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Tomaszewski, Wieloletnia i sezonowa dynamika niżówek w rzekach środkowej Polski (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Tomaszewski, Mon. KGW PAN XX, 1, 173-185 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  21. C.G. Markham, An. of the Ass. of Am. Geogr. 60, 3, 593-597 (1970) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Kożuchowski, J. Wibig, Ac. Geogr. Lodz. 55, (1988) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Tomaszewski, Ac. Geogr. Łodz. 79 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Bartnik, A. Geogr. Lodz. 91 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Jokiel, B. Stanisławczyk, Pr. Geogr. 144, 9-33 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Stolarska, A. Geogr. Lodz. 94, 97 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Tomalski, Mon. KGW PAN 39, 49-61 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Baran-Gurgul, K. Raczyński, Woda-Środ.-Ob. Wiej. 16, 4, 17-31 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Węglarczyk, Statystyka w inżynierii środowiska (Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  30. H.B. Mann, Econometr. 13, 245-259 (1945) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  31. M.G. Kendall, Rank Correlation Methods (Charles Griffin, London, 1975) [Google Scholar]
  32. K.H. Hamed, A.R. Rao, J. of Hydr. 204, 1-4, 182-196 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. R.H. McCuen, P.A. Johnson, R.M. Ragan, Highway Hydrology: Hydraulic design series number 2 (U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Yue, P. Pilon, G. Cavadis, J. of Hydr. 259, 293, 254-271 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. WMO, Guide to hydrological pracitces E 6, WMO n° 168, 2 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Rutkowska, M. Ptak, St. Geotech. et Mech. 34, 1, 51-63 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Ziemnicki, Gosp. Wod. 16, 11, p. 476-480 (1956) [Google Scholar]
  38. K. Dębski, Gosp. Wod. 18, 8, 339-342 (1958) [Google Scholar]
  39. H. Maruszczak, J. Trembaczowski, Ann. UMCS sec. B XI, 129-168 (1958) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.