Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 33, 2020
International Conference on ICT enhanced Social Sciences and Humanities (ICTeSSH 2020)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Open Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20203301003
Published online 14 August 2020
  1. Borgman, C. 2012. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63: 1059–1078. (2012) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634 [Google Scholar]
  2. Piwowar, H and Vision, T. PeerJ, 1 (e175). (2013) DOI:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175 [Google Scholar]
  3. Wilkinson, M, et al. Scientific Data 3 3: 160018 (2016) DOI: https://doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 [Google Scholar]
  4. Digital Curation Centre (dcc.ac.uk): Overview of funders’ data policies:http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/policy-and-legal/overview-funders-data-policies [Google Scholar]
  5. Stall, S. Copdess.org – Enabling FAIR data project (AGU) (2018):http://www.copdess.org/enabling-fair-data-project/ [Google Scholar]
  6. Sample taken from DataCite (May 1, 2020) https://stats.datacite.org/ [Google Scholar]
  7. Bierer, B, et al. N Engl J Med, 376. (2017) DOI:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1616595 [Google Scholar]
  8. Mongeon, P, et al. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69: 545–556. (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0024 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fane, B, What is the State of Open Data in 2019? (2019) DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10011788 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cousijn, H, et al. Data Science Journal, 18: 9, pp. 1–7. (2019) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-009 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cantu-Ortiz, F 2017. Research Analytics: Boosting University Productivity and Competitiveness Through Scientometrics. Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315155890 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kratz, J and Strasser, C. Scientific Data, 2. (2015) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.39 [Google Scholar]
  13. Burton, A, et al. D-Lib Magazine, 23 (1/2) (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1045/january2017-burton [Google Scholar]
  14. Burton, A, et al. Scholix Metadata Schema for Exchange of Scholarly Communication Links. Zenodo. (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1120265 [Google Scholar]
  15. Burton, A, et al. Program, 51(1): 75–100. (2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-06-2016-0048 [Google Scholar]
  16. The Scholix hub from OpenAire: https://www.openaire.eu/scholexplorer - sample taken April 2020 [Google Scholar]
  17. The Scopus API from Elsevier.com: https://dev.elsevier.com/- sample taken April 2020 [Google Scholar]
  18. https://data.mendeley.com/research-data/Mendeley Data Monitor search index; available through API from https://datasearch.elsevier.com/api/docs#/search/search_1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Zudilova-Seinstra, Elena; Zigoni, Alberto; Haak, Wouter (2020), Mendeley Data, V2, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/k5p45z33kb.2 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.