Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 45, 2022
2021 3rd International Conference on Computer Science Communication and Network Security (CSCNS2021)
Article Number 01073
Number of page(s) 14
Section Computer Technology and System Design
Published online 19 May 2022
  1. Zhong T. Analysis of development factors, Driving force and Growth sustainability of direct broadcast e-commerce [J]. Commercial Economic Research, 18 (2020):85-88 [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhou Y F, Zhang T, Chen S N. Social media communication and consumer sentiment: A Case study of Xicha [J]. Business Economics and Management, 04 (2018) No.318(04):72-82. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang H, Dong Z., Wang H S. An empirical study on the influence of value co-creation on design attributes of fashion products [J]. Journal of Management (2017) 014(009):1351-1361. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tajfel H. Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1982, 33(1):1-39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kristopher F, Ryan F, Saad A, et al. How online product reviews affect retail sales:a meta-analysis[J].Journal of retailing, 6 (2014):53-71. [Google Scholar]
  6. Batra, Rajeev and Olli T. Ahtola (1990), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes, ” Marketing Letters, 2 (2), 159–70. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mano, Haim and Richard L. Oliver (1993), “Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction, ” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (December), 451–66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions, ” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer), 92–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Strahilevitz, Michal A. and John G. Myers (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell, ” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (March), 434–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yao H S. Discussion on current Situation, Problems and Future development strategies of live Streaming e-commerce Industry [J]. Modern Marketing (Information Edition), 05 (2020):63-65. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang X H, Nie KY, Chen R “. Interpretive Behavior “or” Interpretive response “? What kind of online reviews are more useful: The impact of online reviews on consumers’ purchasing decisions based on explanatory types and boundary conditions [J]. Nankai Management Review, 4(2017):27-37. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fu X S. Research on Mobile Live Video from the Perspective of Communication and Sociology [J]. Shandong Social Sciences, 4 (2017):187-192. [Google Scholar]
  13. Park J K, John D R. Capitalizing on brand personalities in advertising: The influence of implicit self-theories on ad appeal effectiveness[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3 (2012), 22(3):424-432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Aguirre-Rodriguez A, Bosnjak M, Sirgy M J. Moderators of the self-congruity effect on consumer decision-making: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research, (2012), 65(8):1179-1188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Boer D, Fischer R, Strack M, et al. How shared preferences in music create bonds between people: values as the missing link.[J]. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, (2011) 37(9):1159-1171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wattanasuwan K. The self and symbolic consumption[J]. Journal of American Academy of Business Cambridge Mar, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang H H, Mitchell V W, Rosenaum-Elliott R. Are Consumer and Brand Personalities the Same?[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 29(5) (2012) [Google Scholar]
  18. Cai L Q. Emotional operation in visual consumption. Master thesis, Central China Normal University, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang B H, Luo Y Q. Live broadcasting with goods and deep embedded marketing: The transformation of sales labor under the background of double circulation. New Horizons, 1006-0138 (2021)01-0105-08 [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu P S, Shi Y D. The influence mechanism of live broadcast with goods marketing model on Consumer purchase decision [J]. Chinese Circulation Economy, 2020(10):38-47. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang M X, Liao J Y, Zhou N. The effect of community experience on brand loyalty [J]. Nankai Management Review, 2015(3):151-160. [Google Scholar]
  22. Amit M, Fried M N. Authority and Authority Relations in Mathematics Education: A View from an 8th Grade Classroom[J]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2005, 58(2):145-168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Engle R A, Langer-Osuna J M, Royston M K D. Toward a Model of Influence in Persuasive Discussions: Negotiating Quality, Authority, Privilege, and Access Within a Student-Led Argument[J]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2014, 23(2):245-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Inglis M, Mejia-Ramos J P. The Effect of Authority on the Persuasiveness of Mathematical Arguments[J]. Cognition & Instruction, 2009, 27(1):25-50. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lori A. Kurth, Charles W. Anderson, Annemarie Palincsar. The Case of Carla: Dilemmas of Helping All Students to Understand Science[J]. Science Education, May 2002, 86(3):287-313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jennifer M. Langer-Osuna (2016) The Social Construction of Authority Among Peers and Its Implications for Collaborative Mathematics Problem Solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18:2, 107-124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang C L, Lin X. Migration of Chinese Consumption Values: Traditions, Modernization, and Cultural Renaissance[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 88(suppl.3):399-409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gao L, Wheeler S C, Shiv B. The “Shaken Self”: Product Choices as a Means of Restoring Self-View Confidence[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009, 36. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kassarjian H H. Content Analysis in Consumer Research[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1977, 4(1):8-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Normann R. Service Management:Strategy and Leadership in Service Business[J]. New york:Wiley, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  31. Friedman J. Cultural Identity & Global Process[M]. 1994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang N. Consumption and Identity -Exploration of an Analytical Framework of Consumption Sociology [J]. Sociological Research, 2001(01):6-16. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chang Y. Impression, Idea and Knowledge worship: A Study of reception of communication. Friends of the Editor, 1003-6687 (2019)12-042-05 [Google Scholar]
  34. Dennis C, Ahrholdt S, Gudergan M. Enhancing loyalty:when improving consumer satisfaction and delight matters[J].Journal of business research, 2019(11):63-82. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu Y L. Identification of authority, dispute and the choice of its resolution mechanism: Chinese experience from the perspective of sociology of Law. Jiangsu Social Sciences. 2013(6):110-116 [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu Z Y, Zhao X H, Long W. Formation mechanism of consumers’ purchase intention under online celebrity live broadcasting [J]. Chinese Circulation Economy, 2020(8):48-57. [Google Scholar]
  37. Reichheld F, Markey R, Hopton C. Ecustomer loyalty-applying the traditional rules of business for online success [J].European business journal, 2000(4):173-180. [Google Scholar]
  38. Labrecque L I. Fostering Consumer–Brand Relationships in Social Media Environments: The Role of Parasocial Interaction[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, (2014) 28(2):134-148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moon J W, Kim Y G. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context[J]. Information & Management, (2001) 38(4):217-230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jiang J H, Li Q. The internal mechanism of the impact of connection attribute on value co-creation in platform business Model innovation -a case study of Airbnb [J]. Management Review, 2016, 028(007):252-260. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim C K, Han D, Park S B. The effect of brand personality and brand identification on brand loyalty: Applying the theory of social identification[J]. Japanese Psychological Research, (2010) 43(4):195-206. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mael F, Ashforth B E. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, ( 1992) 13(2). [Google Scholar]
  43. Eleanor T. Loiacono, Richard T. Watson & Dale L. Goodhue (2007). WebQual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11:3, 51-87 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. John D. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used?An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales[J]. International journal of market research, 1 (2008):84-96. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.