Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 60, 2024
2023 5th International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System (AISS 2023)
Article Number 00003
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20246000003
Published online 09 January 2024
  1. R P Lourenço, P. Fernando, C. Gomes. From eJustice to open judiciary: An analysis of the Portuguese experience[M]//Open Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global, 2020: 1161-1186. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Andrade, L. A. Joia. Organizational structure and ICT strategies in the Brazilian Judiciary System[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2012, 29: S32-S42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. O. Gomes, S. T. Alves, J. T. Silva. Effects of investment in information and communication technologies on productivity of courts in Brazil[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2018, 35(3): 480-490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. L. Gardner An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning[J]. 1984. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. A. Waterman, M. A. Peterson. Models of Legal Decisionmaking: Research Design and Methods[M]. Rand Corporation, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Liu. Robots steal overseas lawyers’ market [J]. Circumference 2017, No.468(14):18-20. [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Li. Artificial Intelligence in American judicial practice: Issues and challenges [J]. China Law Review 2018(02):54-56. [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Dieterich, C. Mendoza, T. Brennan. COMPAS risk scales: Demonstrating accuracy equity and predictive parity[J]. Northpointe Inc, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Xu, G. Huang and Y. Liu. Building a Comprehensively Smart Court to Promote the Modernization of the Trial System and Capacity. Administrative Management Reform. 2019(05):86-91. [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Jia, X. Jun. E-justice evaluation factors: The case of Smart Court of China[J]. Information Development, 2021, 37(4): 658-670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Jneid, I. Saleh, R. Fakhoury. Digital transformation in justice: Discussion of challenges and a conceptual model for e-justice success[C]//Proc. 19th Eur. Conf. Digit. Government. 2019: 35-42. [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Contini, A. Cordella. Information System and Information Infastructure Deployment: The Challenge of the Italian eJustice Approach[J]. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y.B. Lv, T. He. A Third Party Evaluation Report on the Informatization of Chinese Courts, In: Li L., Tian H., Lv Y. (eds) China’s Rule of Law Index 2017. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Singapore: Springer. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. C. Ragin. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.