Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 60, 2024
2023 5th International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System (AISS 2023)
Article Number 00014
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 09 January 2024
  1. Liu J, Pei Y, Mei C, et al Causes of waterlogging and disaster prevention and control of “July 20” extremely heavy rainstorm in Zhengzhou [J] Journal of Zhengzhou University: Engineering Edition, 2023, 44 (2): 8 [Google Scholar]
  2. The Process of Technological Innovation[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1991, 16(1):45-46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang N, Zhao X, Zhang Z, et al. What factors drive open innovation in China’s public sector? A case study of official document exchange via microblogging (ODEM) in Haining[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2017, 34(1):126-133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruce T R, Hillmann D I. The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting[J]. D.hillman & L.westbrooks Metadata in Practice, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang Y, Li J. Research on Metadata Quality Assessment Methods and Models [J]. Library science Research, 2013 (12): 52-56+51. [Google Scholar]
  6. A resource‐based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2). [Google Scholar]
  7. Oliver R L. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1980, 17(4):460-469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Salmela H. From information systems quality to sustainable business quality [J]. Information & Software Technology, 1997, 39(12):819-825. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nelson R R, Todd P A, Wixom B. Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2005, 21(4):199-235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ochoa X, Duval E. Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories [J]. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2009, 10(2-3):67-91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jo H W, Kim S W. A Service Quality Model for the Public Information Service[C]// U-& E-service, Science & Technology-international Conference, Unesst, Held As. DBLP, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. Reiche K J, Hofig E. Implementation of Metadata Quality Metrics and Application on Public Government Data[C]// Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW), 2013 IEEE 37th Annual. IEEE, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Palavitsinis N, Manouselis N, Sanchez-Alonso S. Metadata quality in learning object repositories: a case study [J]. Electronic Library, 2014, 32(1):62-82(21). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gavrilis D, Makri D N, Papachristopoulos L, et al. Measuring Quality in Metadata Repositories[C]// 19th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2015. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Delone W H, Mclean E R. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 19(4):9-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mo A M, Soon S K. A Comprehensive Model for Measuring the Potential Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Strategic Variables [J]. Decision Sciences, 2010, 22(4):869-897. [Google Scholar]
  17. Doll W J, Raghunathan T S, Lim J S, et al. Research Report ---A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the User Information Satisfaction Instrument [J]. Information Systems Research, 1995, 6(2):177-188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gouldson A. Risk, regulation and the right to know: Exploring the impacts of access to information on the governance of environmental risk [J]. Sustainable Development, 2004, 12(3):136-149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Borgesius F Z, Gray J, Van Eechoud M. Open data, privacy, and fair information principles: Towards a balancing framework [J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2015, 30(3): 2073-2131. [Google Scholar]
  20. Barati M. Open Government Data Programs and Information Privacy Concerns: A Literature Review [J]. Available at SSRN 4029092, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilt M. Balancing the Release of Public Information during an Animal Disease Outbreak [J]. Case W. Res. J. Int’l L., 2006, 38: 625. [Google Scholar]
  22. Florini A M. Right to know : transparency for an open world[M]. Columbia University Press, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.