Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 61, 2024
The 9th International Symposium on Current Progress in Mathematics and Sciences 2023 (The 9th ISCPMS 2023) in conjunction with AUA Academic Conference on the Application of Artificial Intelligences and Data Sciences in a Modern Science for a Better Life
Article Number 01021
Number of page(s) 14
Published online 10 January 2024
  1. J. Galos, R. Das, M. P. Sutcliffe, and A. P. Mouritz, Mater. Des 221, 111013 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. S. Ashrith, T. P. Jeevan, and J. Xu, J. Compos. Sci. 7, 252 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Lunetto, M. Galati, L. Settineri, and L. Iuliano, J. Manuf. Process. 85, 858–874 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. R. Oliveira, M. May, T. H. Panzera, and S. Hiermaier, Thin-Walled Struct. 177, 109426 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Q. Ma, M. R. M. Rejab, J. P. Siregar, and Z. Compos. Mater 55, 2513–2555 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. M. Batouli, Y. Zhu, M. Nar, and N. A. D’Souza, J. Clean. Prod. 66, 164–173 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Ulutaş, F. Balo, and A. Topal, Polymers (Basel) 15, 6 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Alsubari et al., Polymers (Basel) 13, 1-20 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Ahmad, H. S. Choi, and M. K. Park, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 300, 10–242015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. S. Ridhar, A. R. Shashikala, and P. K. Vishnu, PalArch’s J. Archeol. Egypt 17, 5588–5604 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Faruk, A. K. Bledzki, H. P. Fink, and M. Sci 37, 1552–1596 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. D. Salman et al., Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 894565 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. S. Afkari, A. L. Juwono, and S. Roseno, Adv. Mater. Process. Technol., 1-18 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Behnisch, V. Lichtner, F. Henning, and P. Rosenberg, J. Compos. Sci. 5, 104 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Khan et al., Mater. Today Commun. 24, 101233 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Mohan Kumar, K. Raghavendra Ravikiran, and H. K. Govindaraju, Mater. Today Proc. 5, 13367–13374 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. R. Correia, M. Garrido, J. A. Gonilha, F. A. Branco, and L. G. Reis, Int. J. Struct. Integr. 3, 127–147 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. L. Ollivia, A. L. Juwono, and S. Roseno, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 196, 1 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Abdurohman and M. Siahaan, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1005, 1 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  20. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Sandwich Constructions, ASTM C393-00 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  21. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Flatwise Compressive Properties of Sandwich Cores, ASTM C365/C365M-11 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  22. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure, ASTM C393/C393M–06 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Sivalingam, K. Vijayan, S. Mouleeswaran, V. Vellingiri, and S. Mayilswamy, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 236, 180–189 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Sharafi et al., Eng. Solid Mech. 6, 285–298 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. A. Azmi, H. Z. Abdullah, and M. I. Idris, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 50 (1), 012067 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Dai, G. Zhou, J. Sun, M. Chen, and J. Wang, J. Compos. Mater.: Sage Journals 50 (20), 2807–2821 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Al-Azad, N. H. B. Dedifitrianto, and M. K. M. Shah, J. Mater. Sci. Chem. Eng. 09, 29–38 (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.