Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 65, 2024
International Conference on Multidisciplinary Approach in Engineering, Technology and Management for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap for Viksit Bharat @ 2047 (ICMAETM-24)
Article Number 05004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Management and Others
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20246505004
Published online 16 July 2024
  1. M. Salanova, S. Llorens, and E. Cifre, “The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies,” International Journal of Psychology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 422–436, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.680460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Chen, “Validating the Technostress Instrument using a Sample of Chinese Knowledge Workers,” Journal of International Technology and Information Management, vol. 24, no. 1, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.58729/1941-6679.1036. [Google Scholar]
  3. Q. Tu, K. Wang, and Q. Shu, “COMPUTER -RELATED TECHNOSTRESS IN CHINA,” Commun ACM, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 77–81, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Qi, “A double-edged sword? Exploring the impact of students’ academic usage of mobile devices on technostress and academic performance,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1337–1354, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1585476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayyagari, Grover, and Purvis, “Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 831, 2011, doi: 10.2307/41409963. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Tarafdar, Q. Tu, and T. S. Ragu-Nathan, “Impact of Technostress on End-User Satisfaction and Performance,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 303–334, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. T. S. Ragu-Nathan, M. Tarafdar, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, and Q. Tu, “The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation,” Information Systems Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 417–433, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1287/isre.1070.0165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. U. N. U. Ahmad, S. M. Amin, and W. K. W. Ismail, “The Relationship Between Technostress Creators and Organisational Commitment Among Academic Librarians,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 40, pp. 182–186, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. K. Jena, “Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academician,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 51, pp. 1116–1123, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Brod, Technostress: The Human Cost of Computer Revolution. Addison-Wesley, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. M. Weil and L. D. Rosen, TechnoStress: Coping with Technology @ Work @Home @Play. United States: Wiley, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Tarafdar, Q. Tu, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, and T. S. Ragu-Nathan, “The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 301–328, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. A. LePine, M. A. LePine, and C. L. Jackson, “Challenge and Hindrance Stress: Relationships With Exhaustion, Motivation to Learn, and Learning Performance.,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 883–891, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.883. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Maier, S. Laumer, M. Tarafdar, J. Mattke, L. Reis, and T. Weitzel, “Challenge and Hindrance IS Use Stressors and Appraisals: Explaining Contrarian Associations in Post-Acceptance IS Use Behavior,” J Assoc Inf Syst, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1590–1624, 2021, doi: 10.17705/1jais.00709. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. S. Nisafani, G. Kiely, and C. Mahony, “Workers’ technostress: a review of its causes, strains, inhibitors, and impacts,” J DecisSyst, vol. 29, no. sup1, pp. 243–258, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1080/12460125.2020.1796286. [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Boonjing and P. Chanvarasuth, “Risk of overusing mobile phones: Technostress effect,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 111, pp. 196–202, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Kumar, R. Lal, Y. Bansal, and K. Saran Sharma, “Technostress in Relation to Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment among IT Professionals.” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1–3, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Suh and J. Lee, “Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction,” Internet Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 140–159, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1108/IntR-06-2015-0181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. T. Oh and S. Park, “A Study of the Connected Smart Worker’s Techno-stress,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 91, pp. 725–733, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Yin, C. X. J. Ou, R. M. Davison, and J. Wu, “Coping with mobile technology overload in the workplace,” Internet Research, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1189–1212, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1108/IntR-01-2017-0016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. O. S. Emmanuel, A. Aregbesola, and O. Oluwasina, “Technostress, Library Staff and Productivity: Ray on Landmark University Library,” Journal of Applied Information Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. U. & A. U. Norulkamar, S. Mohd Amin, and W. K. Ismail, “The Impact of Technostress on Organizational Commitment among Malaysian Academic Librarians,” Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, vol. 38, pp. 103–123, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Yun, W. J. Kettinger, and C. C. Lee, “A New Open Door: The Smartphone’s Impact on Work-to-Life Conflict, Stress, and Resistance,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 121–152, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415160405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Atanasoff and M. A. Venable, “Technostress: Implications for Adults in the Workforce,” Career Dev Q, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 326–338, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1002/cdq.12111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Hang, G. Hussain, A. Amin, and M. I. Abdullah, “The Moderating Effects of Technostress Inhibitors on Techno-Stressors and Employee’s Well-Being,” Front Psychol, vol. 12, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.821446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Nimrod, “Technostress: measuring a new threat to well-being in later life,” Aging Ment Health, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1086–1093, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1334037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. R.-J. Yang, J.-Y. Yang, H.-R. Yuan, and J.-T. LI, “Techno-Stress of Teachers: An Empirical Investigation from China,” DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, no. icesd, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.12783/dtssehs/icesd2017/11619. [Google Scholar]
  28. J.-C. Park, S. Kim, and H. Lee, “Effect of work-related smartphone use after work on job burnout: Moderating effect of social support and organizational politics,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 105, p. 106194, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Salanova, R. M. Grau, E. Cifre, and S. Llorens, “Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: the moderating role of computer self-efficacy,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 575–590, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00028-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. S. C. Srivastava, S. Chandra, and A. Shirish, “Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 355–401, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1111/isj.12067. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. R. Riedl, “On the biology of technostress,” ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 18–55, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1145/2436239.2436242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Tams, J. B. Thatcher, and V. Grover, “Concentration, Competence, Confidence, and Capture: An Experimental Study of Age, Interruptionbased Technostress, and Task Performance,” J Assoc Inf Syst, vol. 19, pp. 857–908, 2018, doi: 10.17705/1jais.00511. [Google Scholar]
  33. T.-F. Kummer, J. Recker, and M. Bick, “Technology-induced anxiety: Manifestations, cultural influences, and its effect on the adoption of sensor-based technology in German and Australian hospitals,” Information & Management, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 73–89, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.04.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Lee, “Does Stress from Cell Phone Use Increase Negative Emotions at Work?” Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 705–715, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.2224/sbp.2016.44.5.705. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Sriwidharmanely, S. Sumiyana, J. H. Mustakini, and E. Nahartyo, “Encouraging positive emotions to cope with technostress’s adverse effects: insights into the broaden-and-build theory,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2201–2214, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1955008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. E. Rohwer, J.-C. Flöther, V. Harth, and S. Mache, “Overcoming the ‘Dark Side’ of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 3625, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063625. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Tarafdar, H. Pirkkalainen, M. Salo, and M. Makkonen, “Taking on the ‘Dark Side’––Coping With Technostress,” IT Prof, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 82–89, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MITP.2020.2977343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Ioannou, M. Lycett, and A. Marshan, “The Role of Mindfulness in Mitigating the Negative Consequences of Technostress,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 523–549, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10239-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. L. E. Rocha and M. Debert-Ribeiro, “Working conditions, visual fatigue, and mental health among systems analysts in São Paulo, Brazil.,” Occup Environ Med, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 24–32, Jan. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  40. S. W. Rayburn, V. Badrinarayanan, S. T. Anderson, and A. Gupta, “Continuous techno-training and business-to-business salesperson success: How boosting techno-efficacy enhances sales effort and performance,” J Bus Res, vol. 133, pp. 66–78, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.066. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.