EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 78 (2025) ITM Web Conf., 78 (2025) 03022 References
Error
  • The authentification system partialy failed, sorry for the inconvenience. Please try again later.
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2025
International Conference on Computer Science and Electronic Information Technology (CSEIT 2025)
Article Number 03022
Number of page(s) 14
Section Intelligent Systems and Computing in Industry, Robotics, and Smart Infrastructure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20257803022
Published online 08 September 2025
  1. Nakamoto, S.: 'Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System'. SSRN, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, I., Zarick, R., Wong, D., et al.: 'QMDB: Quick Merkle Database'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05262, 2025 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aryan, P., Khatri, R., Vijayakumar, B.: 'An Experimental Framework for Implementing Decentralized Autonomous Database Systems in Rust'. Proc. 2024 Int. Conf. Computational Intelligence and Network Systems (CINS), 2024, pp. 1–8 [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhuang, Q., Shi, X., Liu, S., et al.: 'GeoTP: Latency-aware Geo-Distributed Transaction Processing in Database Middlewares (Extended Version)'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01213, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, Z., Hu, H., Zhou, X., et al.: 'Fast Commitment for Geo-Distributed Transactions via Decentralized Co-coordinators', Proc. VLDB Endow., 2024, 17, (10), pp. 2555–2567 [Google Scholar]
  6. Nododile, T., Nyirenda, C.: 'A Hybrid Blockchain-IPFS Solution for Secure and Scalable Data Collection and Storage for Smart Water Meters'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03427, 2025 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fernández-Blanco, G., Froiz-Míguez, I., Fraga-Lamas, P., et al.: 'Design, Implementation and Practical Energy-Efficiency Evaluation of a Blockchain Based Academic Credential Verification System for Low-Power Nodes'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20605, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu, M., Zhang, J., Guo, H., et al.: 'FileDES: A Secure, Scalable and Succinct Decentralized Encrypted Storage Network'. Cryptol. ePrint Arch., Rep. 2024/182, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brijwani, G.N., Ajmire, P.E., Junaid, M.A.M., et al.: 'Revolutionizing Healthcare Record Management: Secure Documentation Storage and Access through Advanced Blockchain Solutions'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00742, 2025 [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, Y., Hsieh, C.-H., Li, C.: 'Research and Analysis on the Distributed Database of Blockchain and Non-Blockchain'. Proc. 2020 IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Cloud Comput. Big Data Anal. (ICCCBDA), Chengdu, China, 2020, pp. 307–313 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fedotova, N., Veltri, L.: 'Byzantine Generals Problem in the Light of P2P Computing'. Proc. 2006 Third Annual Int. Conf. Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services, San Jose, CA, USA, 2006, pp. 1–5 [Google Scholar]
  12. Sharma, S., Sharma, O., Arora, J.: 'Consensus Mechanisms Analysis: A Remedy for the Byzantine Generals Problem'. Proc. 2023 3rd Int. Conf. Technological Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICTACS), Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2023, pp. 674–678 [Google Scholar]
  13. Jelasity, M.: 'Gossip', in Serugendo, G.D.M., Gleizes, M.-P., Karageorgos, A. (Eds.): 'Self-organising Software' (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 139–162 [Google Scholar]
  14. Trautwein, D., Raman, A., Tyson, G., et al.: 'Design and Evaluation of IPFS: A Storage Layer for the Decentralized Web'. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conf., 2022, pp. 739–752 [Google Scholar]
  15. Islam, S., Apu, K.U.: 'Decentralized vs. Centralized Database Solutions in Blockchain: Advantages, Challenges, and Use Cases'. Global Mainstream J. Innov. Eng. Emerg. Technol., 2024, 3, (04), pp. 58–68 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bailis, P., Ghodsi, A.: 'Eventual Consistency Today: Limitations, Extensions, and Beyond'. Queue, 2013, 11, (3), pp. 20–32 [Google Scholar]
  17. BigchainDB: 'BigchainDB 2.0 The Blockchain Database'. Whitepaper, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chauhan, A.: 'A review on various aspects of MongoDB databases', Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT), 2019, 8 (5), pp. 90–92 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bluzelle: 'Bluzelle Technical Paper'. https://bluzelle.com/ [Google Scholar]
  20. Petriv, P., Opirskyy, I., Mazur, N.: 'Modern technologies of decentralized databases, authentication, and authorization methods', Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems II, 2024, 3826, pp. 60–71 [Google Scholar]
  21. Tang, W., Sheng, P., Roy, P., et al.: 'Raft-Forensics: High Performance CFT Consensus with Accountability for Byzantine Faults'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.09123, 2023 [Google Scholar]
  22. Alqahtani, S., Demirbas, M.: 'Bottlenecks in Blockchain Consensus Protocols'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.04234, 2021 [Google Scholar]
  23. Yin, M., Malkhi, D., Reiter, M.K., et al.: 'HotStuff: BFT Consensus in the Lens of Blockchain'. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05069, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, J., Li, W., Karame, G.O., Asokan, N.: 'Scalable Byzantine Consensus via Hardware-Assisted Secret Sharing'. IEEE Trans. Comput., 2019, 68, (1), pp. 139–151 [Google Scholar]
  25. Laneve, C., Solmonte, S., Veschetti, A.: 'A Stochastic Analysis of the Gasper Protocol'. Proc. 2024 IEEE Int. Conf. Pervasive Comput. Commun. Workshops, Biarritz, France, 2024, pp. 518–523 [Google Scholar]
  26. De la Rocha, A., Dias, D., Psaras, Y.: 'Accelerating Content Routing with Bitswap: A Multi-path File Transfer Protocol in IPFS and Filecoin', 2021 [Google Scholar]
  27. Maymounkov, P., Mazières, D.: 'Kademlia: A Peer-to-Peer Information System Based on the XOR Metric'. Proc. First Int. Workshop Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS '01), 2002, pp. 53–65 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bistas, F., Xylomenos, G.: 'Evaluating IPFS Optimistic Provide in the Wild'. Proc. 2024 IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun. Workshops (CSCN), 2024, pp. 160–165 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gomes, B., Eisa, S., Matos, D.R., Pardal, M.L.: 'Decentralized Storage and Self-Sovereign Identity for Document-Based Claims'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16987, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  30. Doan, T., Bajpai, V., Psaras, Y., Ott, J.: 'Towards Decentralised Cloud Storage with IPFS: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions'. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06315, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  31. Buri, I., van Hoboken, J.: 'The Digital Services Act (DSA) Proposal: A Critical Overview'. Inst. Inf. Law (IViR), Univ. Amsterdam, Oct. 2021 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mishra, S.: 'A Survey of LSM-Tree Based Indexes, Data Systems and KV-Stores'. Proc. 2024 IEEE Int. Students’ Conf. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. (SCEECS), 2024, pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  33. Rusinkiewicz, M.E., Leiss, E.L.: 'Evaluation of Timestamp-Based Concurrency Control Mechanisms Incorporating Livelock Avoidance'. Inf. Sci., 1991, 55, (1-3), pp. 1–26 [Google Scholar]
  34. Su, J., Hao, C., Sun, S., et al.: 'Revisiting the Design of In-Memory Dynamic Graph Storage'. Proc. ACM Manag. Data, 2025, 3, (1), Art. no. 70 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wei, Y., Trautwein, D., Psaras, Y., et al.: 'The Eternal Tussle: Exploring the Role of Centralization in IPFS'. Proc. 21st USENIX Symp. Netw. Syst. Des. Implement. (NSDI), Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2024, Art. no. 25 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lupaiescu, S., Cioata, P., Turcu, C.E., et al.: 'Centralized vs. Decentralized: Performance Comparison between BigchainDB and Amazon QLDB'. Appl. Sci., 2023, 13, (1), Art. no. 499 [Google Scholar]
  37. Leutenegger, S.T., Dias, D.: 'A Modeling Study of the TPC-C Benchmark'. SIGMOD Rec., 1993, 22, (2), pp. 22–31 [Google Scholar]
  38. Cooper, B.F., Silberstein, A., Tam, E., et al.: 'Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB'. Proc. 1st ACM Symp. Cloud Comput., Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2010, pp. 143–154 [Google Scholar]
  39. Dinh, T.T.A., Wang, J., Chen, G., et al.: 'BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains'. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04057, 2017 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.