EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 82 (2026) ITM Web Conf., 82 (2026) 02005 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 82, 2026
International Conference on NextGen Engineering Technologies and Applications for Sustainable Development (ICNEXTS’25)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 6
Section Communication and Networking
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268202005
Published online 04 February 2026
  1. C. Bhavana, M. Yashaswini, M.T. Scholar, Artificial Intelligence Based Birds and Animal Detection and Alert System. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Mirugwe, J. Nyirenda, E. Dufourq, Automating Bird Detection Based on Webcam Captured Images Using Deep Learning. In Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (SAICSIT 2022), Gerber, A., Ed.; EPiC Series in Computing, 85, 62–76 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Mpouziotas, P. Karvelis, C. Stylios, Advanced Computer Vision Methods for Tracking Wild Birds from Drone Footage. Drones, 8, 259(2024). [Google Scholar]
  4. Y.C. Chen, J.F. Chu, K. W. Hsieh, T. H. Lin, P. Z. Chang, Y.C. Tsai, Automatic wild bird repellent system that is based on deep-learning-based wild bird detection and integrated with a laser rotation mechanism. Sci. Rep., 14, 15924(2024). [Google Scholar]
  5. J.J. Lahoz-Monfort, M.J.L. Magrath, A Comprehensive Overview of Technologies for Species and Habitat Monitoring and Conservation. BioScience, 71, 1038–1062 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Tuia, B. Kellenberger, S. Beery, B.R. Costelloe, S. Zuffi, B. Risse, A. Mathis, M.W. Mathis, F. van Langevelde, T. Burghardt et al. Perspectives in Machine Learning for Wildlife Conservation. Nat. Commun. 13, 792 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Axford, F. Sohel, M.A. Vanderklift, A.J. Hodgson, Collectively Advancing Deep Learning for Animal Detection in Drone Imagery: Successes, Challenges, and Research Gaps. Ecol. Inform. 83, 102842 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Ivanova, A. Prosekov, A. Kaledin, A Survey on Monitoring of Wild Animals during Fires Using Drones. Fire, 5, 60 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Buchelt, A. Adrowitzer, P. Kieseberg, C. Gollob, A. Nothdurft, S. Eresheim, S. Tschiatschek, K. Stampfer, A. Holzinger, Exploring Artificial Intelligence for Applications of Drones in Forest Ecology and Management. For. Ecol. Manag. 551, 121530 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Afridi, L. Laporte-Devylder, G. Maalouf, J.M. Kline, S.G. Penny, K. Hlebowicz, D. Cawthorne, Lundquist, U.P.S. Impact of Drone Disturbances on Wildlife: A Review. Drones, 9, 311 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Perz, K. Wronowski, R. Domanski, I. Dąbrowski, Case Study of Detection and Monitoring of Wildlife by UAVs Equipped with RGB Camera and TIR Camera. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 95, 1461–1469 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Mou, T. Liu, C. Zhu, X. Cui, WAID: A Large-Scale Dataset for Wildlife Detection with Drones. Appl. Sci. 13, 10397 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. He, X. Li, X. Wu, C. Su, J. Chen, S. Xu, X. Guo, ALSS-YOLO: An Adaptive Lightweight Channel Split and Shuffling Network for TIR Wildlife Detection in UAV Imagery. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 17, 17308–17326 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Du, Understanding of Object Detection Based on CNN Family and YOLO. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1004, 012029 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. C.A. Mucher, S. Los, G.J. Franke, C. Kamphuis, Detection, Identification and Posture Recognition of Cattle with Satellites, Aerial Photography and UAVs Using Deep Learning Techniques. Int. J. Remote Sens. 43, 2377–2392 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Kellenberger, D. Marcos, S. Lobry, D. Tuia, Half a Percent of Labels Is Enough: Efficient Animal Detection in UAV Imagery Using Deep CNNs and Active Learning. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 57, 9524–9533 (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.