EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 82 (2026) ITM Web Conf., 82 (2026) 03014 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 82, 2026
International Conference on NextGen Engineering Technologies and Applications for Sustainable Development (ICNEXTS’25)
Article Number 03014
Number of page(s) 7
Section Information and Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268203014
Published online 04 February 2026
  1. R. Barelli, M. D’Onghia & S. Longari, Toward Secure Electronic Voting: A Survey on E-Voting Systems and Attacks, IEEE Access. 13, 89600–89626 (2025). doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.0429000. [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Kshetri & J. Voas, Blockchain-Enabled E-Voting. IEEE Software. 35 (4), 95–99 (2018). doi:10.1109/MS.2018.2801546. [Google Scholar]
  3. U. Jafar, M. J. A. Aziz & Z. Syed, Blockchain for Electronic Voting System — Review and Open Issues, Sensors, 21, 5874 (2021). doi:10.3390/s21245874. [Google Scholar]
  4. F.Hjálmarsson, G.K. Hreiðarsson, M. Hamdaqa & G. Hjálmtýsson, Blockchain-Based E-Voting System, in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 983–986. doi:10.1109/CLOUD.2018.00151. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. McCorry, S. F. Shahandashti & F. Hao, A Smart Contract for Boardroom Voting with Maximum Voter Privacy. in Financial Cryptography and Data Security – 21st International Conference, FC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10322, 357–375 (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70972-7_20. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Agarwal & G. N. Pandey, Online voting system for India based on AADHAAR ID. in Proceedings of the 11ᵗʰ International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering (ICTKE 2013), 2013. doi:10.1109/ICTKE.2013.6756265. [Google Scholar]
  7. H.V. Purandare, A.R. Saini, F.D. Pereira, B. Mathew & P.S. Patil, Application for Online Voting System Using Android Device. in Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Smart City and Emerging Technology (ICSCET 2018), 2018. doi:10.1109/ICCSP.2018.8487323. [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Chondros, B. Zhang, T. Zacharias, P. Diamantopoulos, S. Maneas, C. Patsonakis, A. Delis, A. Kiayias & M. Roussopoulos, D-DEMOS: A Distributed, End-to-End Verifiable, Internet Voting System, in 2016 IEEE/ACM 36th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. A.D. Rubin, Security Considerations for Remote Electronic Voting over the Internet. arXiv preprint cs.cy/0108017 (2001). https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs.cy/0108017. [Google Scholar]
  10. V. Thamke, T. Patil, M. Phaldesai, R. Pokarne, P. Kumar & T. Bhuruk, Real Time Polling System. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET). 9(1), 332 (2022). https://www.irjet.net/archives/V9/i1/IRJET-V9I159.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. Live audience polling system. PubNub Blog (2020). https://www.pubnub.com/blog/live-audience-polling-system/ [Google Scholar]
  12. A study of mechanisms for end-to-end verifiable online voting, BSI Report (2017). https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/E N/BSI/Publications/Studies/Cryptography/End-to-End-Verifiable_Online-Voting.pdf? blob=publicationFile&v=4 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. T. Ali & J. Murray, An Overview of End-to-End Verifiable Voting Systems, in Real-World Electronic Voting: Design, Analysis and Deployment, Eds. F. Hao & P. Ryan, CRC Press (2017), Chapter 8, pp. 175–216. https://realworldevoting.com/files/Chapter8.pdf [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Murley & M. Bailey, WebSocket Adoption and the Landscape of the Real-Time Web. in Proceedings of the 2021 Web Conference (WWW 2021), 2021. https://faculty.cc.gatech.edu/~mbailey/publications/www21_websocket.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. Victoria Pimentel & Bradford G. Nickerson, Communicating and displaying real-time data with WebSocket, IEEE Internet Computing, 23(3), 75–81 (2019). doi:10.1109/MIC.2019.2913447 [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Sereda, Real-time interaction on the web: how WebSockets change application performance, International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 14 (05), 27229–27233 (2025). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392604799_Real-time_interaction_on_the_web_how_WebSockets_change_application_performance [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Pandey, Enhancing Real-time Web Applications with WebSockets: Performance and Responsiveness, International Journal of Novel Research and Development (IJNRD), 9 (1), (2024). https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2406082.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Sharma & R. Agarwal, HTTP, WebSocket, and SignalR: A Comparison of Real-Time Online Communication Protocols, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 128–135 (2023). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374151261_HTTP_WebSocket_and_SignalR_A_Comparison_of_Real-Time_Online_Communication_Protocols [Google Scholar]
  19. Scaling live experiences: Horizontal vs vertical scaling for WebSockets, Ably Blog (2021). https://ably.com/blog/websockets-horizontal-vs-vertical-scaling [Google Scholar]
  20. U. Jafar, M.J.A. Aziz & Z. Shukur, Blockchain for Electronic Voting System — Review and Open Research Challenges. Sensors, 21 (17), 5874 (2021). https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8732/4/4/21. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.