Open Access
| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 82, 2026
International Conference on NextGen Engineering Technologies and Applications for Sustainable Development (ICNEXTS’25)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03019 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Information and Technology | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268203019 | |
| Published online | 04 February 2026 | |
- Rubin, Security considerations for remote electronic voting over the Internet. AT&T Labs Research (2001). http://avirubin.com/evoting.security.html [Google Scholar]
- T.G. Rossler, E-voting: A survey and introduction. (2011). http://wiki.agoraciudadana.org/images/5/56/An%2 BIntroduction%2Bto%2BElectronic%2BVoting% 2BSchemes.pdf [Google Scholar]
- H. Agarwal, G.N. Pandey, Online voting system for India based on AADHAAR ID. in Proc. Int. Conf. ICT Knowl. Eng. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTKE.2013.6756265 [Google Scholar]
- Kiayias, T. Zacharias, B. David, A. Russell, SCV: End-to-end verifiable Internet voting. in Proc. USENIX Security Workshop (2016). https://www.usenix.org/conference [Google Scholar]
- P. McCorry, S.F. Shahandashti, F. Hao, A smart contract for boardroom voting with maximum voter privacy. (2017). https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/110.pdf [Google Scholar]
- End-to-end verifiable voting systems. National Academies / NIST Workshop Report (2017). https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2017/NIST.IR.8112.pdf [Google Scholar]
- BSI, A study of mechanisms for end-to-end verifiable online voting. BSI Report (2017). https://www.bsi.bund.de [Google Scholar]
- Y. Zhang, Q. Wu, D. Chen, Real-time interaction on the web: How WebSockets change application performance. J. Web Eng. 18, 1–24 (2020) [Google Scholar]
- Marathe, HTTP, WebSocket, and SignalR: A comparison of real-time online technologies. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Trends (IJSRET) 9 (2020) [Google Scholar]
- Live audience polling system. PubNub Blog (2020). https://www.pubnub.com/blog/live-audience-polling-system/ [Google Scholar]
- M.P. Singh, A.R. Shrestha, S. Kumar, H. Kim, WebSocket adoption and the landscape of the real-time web. in Proc. ACM Internet Meas. Conf. (IMC) (2020). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3419394.3423641 [Google Scholar]
- Real time polling system. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. (IRJET) 6 (2019). https://www.irjet.net/archives/V6/i5/IRJET-V6I5658.pdf [Google Scholar]
- S. Gupta, Communicating and displaying real-time data with WebSocket. IEEE Internet Comput. 23, 75–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2019.2913447 [Google Scholar]
- S. Deshmukh, Android based application for e-voting. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 7, 1–4 (2016) A. Patel, Enhancing real-time web applications with WebSockets. Int. J. Nat. Res. Dev. (IJNRD) 6 (2021). https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2104043.pdf [Google Scholar]
- A. Patel, Enhancing real-time web applications with WebSockets. Int. J. Nat. Res. Dev. (IJNRD) 6 (2021). https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2104043.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Scaling live experiences: Horizontal vs vertical scaling for WebSockets. Ably Blog (2021). https://ably.com/topic/websockets [Google Scholar]
- A. Kumar, V. Sharma, S. Bhattacharya, R. Singh, Blockchain for electronic voting system—review and open issues. Appl. Sci. 12, 12251 (2022). https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/23/12251 [Google Scholar]
- A. Cetinkaya, H. Tekin, Blockchain-based e-voting systems: A technology review. Electron. 11, 2146 (2022). https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/14/2146 [Google Scholar]
- R. Kshetri, J. Voas, Blockchain-enabled e-voting. IEEE Softw. 35, 95–99 (2018). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2214212617301256 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.