Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 84, 2026
2026 International Conference on Advent Trends in Computational Intelligence and Data Science (ATCIDS 2026)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 13
Section Intelligent Computing in Healthcare and Bioinformatics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268401008
Published online 06 April 2026
  1. Ye Xingyang, Wei Zhangyuehao, Yan Hui, et al. ECG Signal Classification Based on ResNet and Bi-LSTM Model Fusion. Aerospace Medicine and Medical Engineering, 2021, 34(03): 244–251. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wu X Y, Rezki Z, Balusu B, et al. One model, dual tasks: a novel distributionally adaptive learning framework for ECG classification and generation addressing intra- and inter-patient variability[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2026, 299(Part C): 130096. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu J Q, Li C, Cao J D, et al. A novel multimodal self-supervised framework for ECG arrhythmia classification[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2025, 198(Part A): 111137. [Google Scholar]
  4. Beijing Jingwei Hengrun Technology Co., Ltd. A method and apparatus for processing electrocardiogram signals: 202411676870.0[P].2025-10-10. [Google Scholar]
  5. South China Normal University. Method, Apparatus, and Computer Device for Extracting Electrocardiogram Signals: 202410276213.0[P].2025-03-18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bekiryazıcı T, Damkacı M, Aydemir G, et al. A novel multichannel sparse convolutional autoencoder for electrocardiogram signal compression[J]. Journal of Electrocardiology, 2025, 93: 154125. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lundström M, Carlhäll C J, Bussman A, et al. The effect of anatomical factors on ECG amplitudes – a cardiac magnetic resonance study[J]. Journal of Electrocardiology, 2025, 93: 154150. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang X S, Chen X L, Li Y W, et al. ECG recognition based on deep convolutional neural network with dual attention mechanism[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2026, 113(Part C): 109142. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khan B, Khalid R T, Masrur M H, et al. Next-generation wearable ECG systems: Soft materials, AI integration, and personalized healthcare applications[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2025, 525: 170117. [Google Scholar]
  10. Santamónica A, Hortal E, Larriba Y, et al. Explainable AI for automatic heart disease diagnosis using 3DFMMecg features: A novel ECG-based approach[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2026, 113(Part C): 109085. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Yu. Research on Detection Methods for Heart Valve Disease Based on Multimodal Data Fusion of Cardiac Signals [D]. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  12. MediaTek Inc. Circuit for Bioelectric Potential Acquisition System and Signal Processing Method Thereof: 202110882142.5[P]. 2025-08-01. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mudanjiang Medical University. Full-cycle ECG acquisition and diagnostic assistance system based on millimeter-wave radar: 202510419890.8[P].2025-07-15. [Google Scholar]
  14. Manimaran G, Peimankar A, Puthusserypady S, et al. Explainable deep learning based techniques for ECG-Based heart disease classification: A systematic literature review and future direction[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2025, 199: 111324. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kranz D D, Krämer J F, Kahriman O, et al. Exploring latent diffusion models for ECG generation on the minute scale[J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2026, 274: 109138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.109138. [Google Scholar]
  16. Slater T A, Kimeu R, Jeilan M, et al. Validation of a handheld electrocardiogram 6 lead recorder to obtain chest lead equivalents: An Africa Heart Rhythm Association study[J]. Heart Rhythm O2, 2025, 6(5): 687–695. [Google Scholar]
  17. Goings D, Haq I U, Arghami A, et al. Transthoracic Echocardiographic and AI-ECG Predictors of Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence After Surgical Ablation[J]. Heart Rhythm O2, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shan W, Chen Y J, Hu J M, et al. Repetitive component analysis and its application to noninvasive fetal electrocardiogram extraction[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2026, 113(Part D): 109166. [Google Scholar]
  19. Escabí-Mendoza J, Rivera-Guzmán N, Rivera-Babilonia J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of atrial fibrillation by computerized electrocardiogram analysis versus cardiologist interpretation[J]. Journal of Electrocardiology, 2025, 93: 154147. [Google Scholar]
  20. May A M, LoCoco S, Mikhova K M, et al. Design and methods of the AUTOMATED-WCT trial: evaluating machine learning–based ECG support for WCT interpretation[J]. Current Problems in Cardiology, 2025, 50(12): 103186. [Google Scholar]
  21. Silwanis C, Eder J, Fellner A, et al. Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Expertise: ECG-Based Detection of Occlusive Myocardial Infarction After Cardiac Arrest[J]. Resuscitation, 2025: 110905. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bashar S K, Socia D, Feuerwerker S, et al. Premature atrial and ventricular contraction detection using deep learning and short ECG: A multi-dataset evaluation[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2026, 113(Part B): 108956. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.