EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 85 (2026) ITM Web Conf., 85 (2026) 02007 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 85, 2026
Intelligent Systems for a Sustainable Future (ISSF 2026)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Cybersecurity, Blockchain & Threat Intelligence
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268502007
Published online 09 April 2026
  1. P. Nistala, A. Rajbhoj, V. Kulkarni, S. Noronha, A. Joshi, An industrial experience report on model-based, AI-enabled proposal development for an RFP/RFI. Sci. Comput. Program. 233, 103058 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2023.103058 [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Rajbhoj, P. Nistala, V. Kulkarni, G. Ganesan, A RFP system for generating response to a request for proposal. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference, pp. 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3299771.3299779 [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Sui, M. Zhou, M. Zhou, S. Han, D. Zhang, Table meets LLM: Can large language models understand structured table data? A benchmark and empirical study. Trans. Struct. Data Intell. 5, 59–78 (2024). https://doi.org/10.5555/tldi.2024.51059 [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Maji, A. Appe, R. Bali, R. Ch., A. Chowdhury, V Bhandaru, An interpretable deep learning system for automatically scoring request for proposals. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.02347 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. MacLaughlin, S. Xu, D.A. Smith, Recovering lexically and semantically reused texts. In *Proceedings of the Tenth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (SEM 2021), Online, pp. 52–66(2021). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.starsem-1.5 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Gullstrand, C. Linden, Generative AI for sales: A study on the potential of retrieval-augmented generation for response automation in the request for proposal process in telecommunications. Master Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology (2024). http://kt.h.diva-port.al.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1884900 [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Gao, Y. Xiong, X. Gao, K. Jia, J. Pan, Y. Bi, Y. Dai, J. Sun, H. Wang, H. Wang, Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Convertino, V. Bellotti, N. Ikeya, O. Brdiczka, A. Hoshino, M. Sakaguchi, Y. Motohashi, H. Sakagamine, Opportunities for proactive support of reuse and organizational learning in ad hoc collaborative work activity: A field study of proposal writing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS 2011), pp. 143–150 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.201L5928676 [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Zhang, Y.S. Wang, Y. Yang, Generation-driven contrastive self-training for zero-shot text classification with instruction-following LLM. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 659–673 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Jin, J. Du, W. Huang, W. Liu, J. Luan, B. Wang, D. Xiong, A comprehensive evaluation of quantization strategies for large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pp. 12186–12215 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Kim, M. Hur, M. Min, From RAG to QA-RAG: Integrating generative AI for pharmaceutical regulatory compliance process. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1293–1295 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Adhikari, Learning systems based automated proposal evaluation (2013). [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Edwards, Knowledge management systems and business processes. Int. J. Knowl. Syst. Sci. 2 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Silva, S. Thelijjagoda, Managing the RFP process of government ICT projects from a discursive perspective. Engineer: Journal of the Institution of Engineers, Sri Lanka 57, 81–92 (2024). https://doi.org/10.4038/engineerv57i47668 [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Nguyen, S. Gupta, K. Do, T. Nguyen, S. Venkatesh, Generating realistic tabular data with large language models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 330–339 (2024). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.