Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 86, 2026
5th International Conference on Current Research in Engineering and Technology (ICCRET-2026)
Article Number 01022
Number of page(s) 10
Section AI & Intelligent Computing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268601022
Published online 05 June 2026
  1. A. Ramesh, M. Pavlov, G. Goh, S. Gray, C. Voss, A. Radford, M. Chen, and I. Sutskever, Zero-shot text-to-image generation, Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 139, 8821–8831 (2021), https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/ramesh21a.html. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR) 2022, 10684–10695 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042. [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Zhang, Z. Pang, S. Huang, et al., Unmasking AI-created visual content: A review of generated images and deepfake detection technologies, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 37, 148 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1007/s44443-025-00154-8. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Rössler, D. Cozzolino, L. Verdoliva, C. Riess, J. Thies, and M. Niessner, FaceForensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images, Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV) 2019, 1–11 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00009. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. C. Ng, M. B. Jasser, B. Issa, S.-S. M. Ajibade, and H. N. Chua, A review on deepfake image detection approaches, techniques and methods, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Autom. Control Intell. Syst. (I2CACIS) 2025, 512–517 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACIS65476.2025.11100461. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Gragnaniello, D. Cozzolino, F. Marra, G. Poggi, and L. Verdoliva, Are GAN generated images easy to detect? A critical analysis of the state-of-the-art, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Multimed. Expo (ICME) 2021, 1–6 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME51207.2021.9428429. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Sha, Z. Li, N. Yu, and Y. Zhang, DE-FAKE: Detection and attribution of fake images generated by text-to-image generation models, Proc. ACM SIGSAC Conf. Comput. Commun. Secur. (CCS) 2023, 3417–3431 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1145/3576915.3616588. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Bottu, Labeled deepfake image collection, Kaggle Dataset (n.d.), https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jayanthbottu/labeled-deepfake-image-collection. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Tan and Q. V. Le, EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks, Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 97, 6105–6114 (2019), https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/tan19a.html. [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Li, J. Bao, H. Yang, D. Chen, and F. Wen, FaceShifter: Towards high fidelity and occlusion-aware face swapping, arXiv preprint 2019, arXiv:1912.13457 (2019), https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.13457. [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Henzler, N. J. Mitra, and T. Ritschel, Learning a neural 3D texture space from 2D exemplars, Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR) 2020, 8157–8166 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00769. [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Liu, I. Perov, D. Gao, N. Chervoniy, W. Zhou, and W. Zhang, DeepFaceLab: Integrated, flexible and extensible face-swapping framework, Pattern Recognit. 141, 109628 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109628. [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Karras, S. Laine, and T. Aila, A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks, Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR) 2019, 4401–4410 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00453. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.