Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 87, 2026
2nd International Conference on Computing Paradigms (ICCP-2026)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268701005
Published online 30 June 2026
  1. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, "XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System," in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2016, pp. 785-794. [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Breiman, "Random Forests," Machine Leaming, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32,2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. N. V. Chawla, K.W. Bowyer, L.O. Hall, and W.P. Kegelmeyer, "SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique," Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321–357,2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Pedregosa et al., "Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python," Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Brownlee, Imbalanced Classification with Python. Machine Learning Mastery, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Dua and C. Graff, "UCI Machine Leaming Repository," University of California, Irvine, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Han, M. Kamber, and J. Pei, Data Mining: Concepts andTechniques, 3rd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning. [Google Scholar]
  11. H. He and E. A. Garcia, “Learning from Imbalanced Data,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1263–1284, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Maldonado and J. López, “Imbalanced Data Classification Using Second-Order Cone Programming Support Vector Machines,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 2070–2079, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. G. E. A. P. A. Batista, R. C. Prati, and M. C. Monard, “A Study of the Behavior of Several Methods for Balancing Machine Learning Training Data,” SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Kubat and S. Matwin, “Addressing the Curse of Imbalanced Training Sets: One- Sided Selection,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 1997, pp. 179–186. [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Friedman, “Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine,” Annals of Statistics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1189–1232, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. P. Murphy, Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. MIT Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. T. M. Mitchell, Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, “A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 119–139, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  19. Z. H. Zhou, Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Domingos, “A Few Useful Things to Know About Machine Learning,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 78–87, 2012. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.