Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 12, 2017
The 4th Annual International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ITA 2017)
Article Number 04021
Number of page(s) 4
Section Session 4: Information Theory and Information Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171204021
Published online 05 September 2017
  1. Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future direction. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5375–5393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Zolli, A., & Healy, A. M. (2012). Resilience: why things bounce back, Simon and Schuster. [Google Scholar]
  3. Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 46–56. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamel, G. and Välikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review 81(9), 52–63. [Google Scholar]
  5. Holling, C.S (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience from systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security dialogue, 42(2), 143–160. Ali E. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (2007). Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.. [Google Scholar]
  8. Powley, E. H. (2009). Reclaiming resilience and safety: resilience activation in the critical period of crisis. Human Relations, 62(9), 1289–1326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative science quarterly, 38(4), 628–652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilbert, M. Eyring, M. & Foster, R.N. (2012). Two routes to resilience. Harvard Business Review, 90(12), 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  11. Linnenluecke, Martina K. (2017). Resilience in business and management research: a review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 4–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. Positive organizational scholarship, 94–110. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Alessandro Annarelli, & Fabio Nonino (2016). Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: current state of research and future directions. Omega, 62, 1–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tierney, K. J. (2003). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and community resilience: lessons from the emergency response following the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE. [Google Scholar]
  16. Deniz Kantur, Arzu İşeri-Say (2015). Measuring organizational resilience: a scale development. Journal of Business, Economics & Finance, 4(3), 456–472. [Google Scholar]
  17. McManus, S. (2008). Organisational resilience in New Zealand, Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. [Google Scholar]
  18. Akgün & Halit Keskin (2014). Organizational resilience capacity and firm product innovativeness and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 6918–6937. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Cunha, M. P. Castanheira, F. Neves, P., Story, J., Rego, A., & Clegg, S. (2013). Resilience in organizations. Working paper [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Der Vegt, G. S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M., & George, G. (2015). Managing risk and resilience. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 971–980. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: toward a micro-intervention. Journal of organizational behavior, 27(3), 387–393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Edmondson, A. C. (2007). The competitive imperative of learning. Harvard business review, 86(7-8), 60–67. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.