EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2017) ITM Web Conf., 12 (2017) 05005 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 12, 2017
The 4th Annual International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ITA 2017)
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 6
Section Session 5: Information Processing Methods and Techniques
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171205005
Published online 05 September 2017
  1. S. Lee, “Power assist control for walking aid with HAL-3 based on EMG and impedance adjustment around knee joint. “in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2002), Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 1499–1504, 30 Sep.–4 Oct, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Kagawa, “A human interface for stride control on a wearable robot. “in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots Systems (IROS 2009), St. Louis, MO, USA, pp. 4067–4072, 11–15 Oct., 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Hayashi., “Control method of robot suit HAL working as operator’s muscle using biological and dynamical information.”in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2005), pp. 3063–3468, 2–6 Aug, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. Farwell, “Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials.”Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 70(6), pp. 510–523, 1988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Weiskopf, Nikolaus, et al. “Principles of a brain-computer interface (BCI) based on real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).” IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering 51(6), pp. 966–970, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Serruya, “Brain-machine interface: Instant neural control of a movement signal.” Nature 416(6877), pp.141–142, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Farina, D., Optimization of wavelets for classification of movement-related cortical potentials generated by variation of force-related parameters. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162(1), pp.357–363, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, Dong-Eun, et al. “EEG analysis following change in hand grip force level for BCI based robot arm force control.” Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems 23.2 (2013): 172–177. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu, B., Fu, Y., Miao, L., Wang, Z., & Li, H. (2011, December). Classification of fNIRS data using wavelets and support vector machine during speed and force imagination. In Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1224–1229). IEEE. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. FU Yun Fa. “Recognition of Actual Grip Force Movement Modes Based on Movement-related Cortical Potentials.” Acta Automatica Sinica 6, 2013, pp:1045–1057. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yin, X., Xu, B., Jiang, C., Fu, Y., Wang, Z., Li, H., & Shi, G.. Classification of Hemodynamic Responses Associated With Force and Speed Imagery for a Brain-Computer Interface. Journal of medical systems, 39(5), pp.1–8, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, C. (2015). Identification of motion trend of lower limbs based on near-infrared spectroscopic technology. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7(3), 1687814015575979. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, C., Li, J., Hu, H., Li, W., Ren, Z., & Qu, W.. Adjustment of Intention to Start a Motion of Lower Limbs Based on Cerebral Hemoglobin Information. In Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC), 2015 7th International Conference on vol. 1, pp. 568–573. IEEE, 2015, August. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, Zengyong, “Spectral analysis of near-infrared spectroscopy signals measured from prefrontal lobe in subjects at risk for stroke.” Medical physics 39(4), pp.2179–2185, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan, Instruction manual for functional optical imaging system FOIRE-3000 series, Manual No.: M587-E005, Rev. B, Oct. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Okamoto, Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage, 21(1), pp. 99–111, 2004. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Tsuzuki, “Virtual spatial registration of stand-alone fNIRS data to MNI space”, NeuroImage, vol. 34, pp. 1506–1518, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Picard, “Imaging the premotor areas.” Current opinion in neurobiology 11(6), pp. 663–672, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang,- G. B., Zhu, Q. Y., & Siew, C. K.. Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing, 70(1), pp.489–501, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang, “Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) 42(2), pp. 513–529, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Zengyong, et al. “Wavelet analysis of skin blood oscillations in persons with spinal cord injury and able-bodied subjects.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 87.9 (2006): 1207–1212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hong, “Classification of prefrontal and motor cortex signals for three-class fNIRS–BCI.” Neuroscience letters 587, pp, 87–92. 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gottemukkula, “Classification-guided feature selection for NIRS-based BCI.” International Ieee/embs Conference on Neural Engineering IEEE, 2011:72–75. [Google Scholar]
  24. Buccino, “Hybrid EEG-fNIRS Asynchronous Brain-Computer Interface for Multiple Motor Tasks.” PloS one 11(1), pp. e0146610, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kai, Keng Ang, J. Yu, and C. Guan. “Extracting effective features from high density nirs-based BCI for assessing numerical cognition.” 22.10, 2012, pp:2233–2236. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zikai Yi, “statically stable walking gait planning of a kind of exoskeleton walking aid robot”. Journal Of Mechanical Transmission (J), 40(1), pp. 48–53, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.