Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 13, 2017
2nd International Conference on Computational Mathematics and Engineering Sciences (CMES2017)
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 02 October 2017
  1. Alpert, D., Bitzer, D.L. Advances in Computer-based Education. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 167, 1582–1590. (1970). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aqda, M.F., Hamidi, F., Rahimi, M. The comparative effect of computer-aided instruction and traditional teaching on student's creativity in math classes. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 266–270. (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aslan, A.E., Puccio, G.J. Developing and Testing a Turkish Version of Torrance's Test of Creative Thinking: A Study of Adults. USA: Journal of Creative Behavior. 40(3), 163–178. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson, S. Does the need for high levels of performance curtail the development of creativity in design and technology project work? International Journal of Design and Education. 10, 255–281 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  5. Barlex, D. Creativity in school design and technology in England: a discussion of influences. International Journal of Technology Design Education, 17, 149–162 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Besemer Susan, P., Donald J. Treffinger Analysis of Creative Products: Review and Synthesis The Journal of Creative Behavior 15(3), 158–178 (1981) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Besemer, S.P., O’Quin, K. The development, reliability and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 268–279 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  8. Betz, J.A. Computer games: Increase learning in an interactive multidisciplinary environment. Journal of Technology Systems, 24(2), 195–205 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bryant, C. A 21st-century art room: the remix of creativity and technology. Art Education, 63(2), 43–48 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. English, L.D., Halford, G.S. Mathematics Education Models and Processes, Models and processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, (1995). [Google Scholar]
  11. Eyadat, W.M., Eyadat, Y.A. Instructional technology and creativity among university students: the missing link. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(2), 87–99 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. Feldhusen, John F., Pamela R. Clinkenbeard. Creativity instructional materials: A review of research. The Journal of Creative Behavior 20(3) 153–182, (1986). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Field, A. Discovering Statistics: Using SPSS (2nd Ed). London: Sage (2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  15. Finke, R.A. Imagery, Creativity and Emergent Structure. Consciousness and Congnition 5 381–393. Article No. 0024. (1996). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. Finke, R.A., Slayton, K. Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery. Memory & Cognition, 16(3), 252–257, (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Higginston, W. Creativity in Mathematics Education: The Role of the Teacher. 9th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Tokyo, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill, A. Community-based Projects in Technology Education: An Approach for Relevant Learning. Paper presented at the International Workshop Seminar for Scholars in Technology Education, Washington, DC, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  19. Howe, R. (1992). Uncovering the creative dimensions of computer-graphic design products. Creativity Research Journal, 5(3), 233–243. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Isaksen, S.G., Puccio, G.J. Adaption-Innovation And The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The Level-Style Issue Revisited. Psychological Reports 63, 659–670 (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jackson, L.A., Witt, E.A., Games, A.I., Fitzgerald, H.E., Van Eye, A., Zhao, Y. Information technology use and creativity: findings from the children and technology Project. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 370–376, (2012). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jang, S. Exploration of secondary students’ creativity by integrating web-based technology into an innovative science curriculum. Computers & Education. 52 247–255. (2008). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  23. Joram, E., Woodruff, E., Bryson, M., Lindsay, P. The effects of revising with a Word processor on writing composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(2), 167–192 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  24. Karakaya, A.F., Demirkan, H. Collaborative digital environments to enhance the creativity of designers. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 176–186 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lewis, T. Creativity: A Framework for the Design/problem Solving Discourse in Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 35–52 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  26. Lewis, T. Research in technology education: Some areas of need. Journal of Technology Education, 10(2), 41–56, (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lewis, T., Petrina, S., Hill, A.M. Problem Posing-Adding a Creative Increment to Technological Problem Solving. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education. 36(1) (1998). [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, M., Hsiao, Y.P. Middle School Students as Multimedia Designers: A Project-Based Learning Approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 311–337 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  29. Lubart, T.I., Sternberg, R.J. An investment approach to creativity: theory and data. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward and R. A. Finke (Eds). The creative cognition approach (pp. 271–302). San Diego: Academic Press (1995). [Google Scholar]
  30. Lucas, B. Creative teaching, teaching creativity and creative learning. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, M. Liebling (Eds.) Creativity in Education. London: Continuum. (2001). [Google Scholar]
  31. Michael, K.Y. The Effect of a Computer Simulation Activity versus a Hands-on Activity on Product Creativity in Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education. 13(1), 31–43. (2001). [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., The Deep-Play Research Group Rethinking technology and creativity in the 21st century: on being in-disciplined. TechTrends, 56(6), 18–21. (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Neo, M., Neo, T.-K. Exploring students’ creativity and design skills through multimedia project: a constructivist approach in a Malaysian classroom. Design and Technology: An International Journal, 18(3), 48–59. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  34. Neuendorf, K. A. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. (2002). - See more at: [Google Scholar]
  35. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Glazewski, K.D., Newby, T. J., Ertmer, P.A. Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing Professional and student needs. Computers & Education 55, >1321–1335, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  36. Parnes, S.J. The Creative Studies Project. In Isaksen, S.G. (Ed.), Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the basic (Pp. 156–188) Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited. (1987). [Google Scholar]
  37. Quitadamo, I.J. Critical Thinking in Higher Education: The Influence of Teaching Styles and Peer Collaboration on Science and Math Learning. Washington State University. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  38. Shuell, T. J., Farber, S. L. Students’ perceptions of technology use in college courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 21–30. (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sosik, J.J., Kahai, S.S., Avolio, B.J. Transformational Leadership and Dimension of Creativity: Motivating Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups. Creativity Research Journal. 11(2), 111–121, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  40. Sun, p., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y., Yeh, D. What drives o successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education. 50(4). 1183-1202, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  41. Şendurur, E., Ersoy, E., Çetin, İ. The design and development of creative instructional materials: the role of domain familiarity for creative solutions. Int J Technol Des Educ. 10.1007/s10798-016-9391-y (2016). [Google Scholar]
  42. Törnkvist, S. Creativity: Can It Be Taught? The Case of Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 23(1), 5–12, (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.