EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 15 (2017) ITM Web Conf., 15 (2017) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 15, 2017
II International Conference of Computational Methods in Engineering Science (CMES’17)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Application Of Computer Programs In Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171501002
Published online 15 December 2017
  1. OMG, Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN): Version 2.0 specification. Technical Report (Object Management Group, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Leopold, J. Mendling, O. Günther, IEEE Software 33. 4, p. 26-33 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Dumas, L. García-Bañuelos, M. La Rosa, R. Uba, Information Systems 38. 4, p. 619-633 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Milani et al., Business & Information Systems Engineering 58.1, p.7-17 (Springer, 2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Koschmider, E. Blanchard, User assistance for business process model decomposition, In: RCIS, p.445-454 (IEEE, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  6. R. KL Ko, E. W. Lee, S. G. Lee., IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 5. 2, p. 246-259 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Kluza, P. Wiśniewski, Spreadsheet-based business process modelling. In: 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems p. 1355-1358 (IEEE, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. F. M. Maggi, A. J. Mooij, W. MP van der Aalst, “User-guided discovery of declarative process models.” In: 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, p.192-199 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Wiśniewski, K. Kluza, M. Ślażyński, A. Ligęza, Constraint-Based Composition of Business Process Models. In: BPAI Workshop held in International Conference on Business Process Management (accepted) [Google Scholar]
  10. P. YH Wong, J. Gibbons, Science of Computer Programming 76.8, p. 633-650 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Skouradaki, V. Andrikopoulos, F. Leymann, Representative BPMN 2.0 process model generation from recurring structures, In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services, p. 468-475 (IEEE, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Burattin, et al., Software & Systems Modelling, p. 1-22 (Springer, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Bernstein, P. Soffer, Identifying and quantifying visual layout features of business process models, In: International Conference on Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modelling, p. 200-213 (Springer, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Ligęza, T. Potempa, Artificial Intelligence for Knowledge Management with BPMN and Rules, In: IFIP International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Knowledge Management, p.19-37 (Springer, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Suchenia et al., Selected Approaches Towards Taxonomy of Business Process Anomalies. In: Advances in Business ICT: New Ideas from Ongoing Research. p. 65-85 (Springer, 2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Suchenia, A. Ligęza, International Journal of Computer Technology & Applications 6.5, p. 789-797 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Szpyrka, G. J. Nalepa, A. Ligeza, K. Kluza, Proposal of Formal Verification of Selected BPMN Models with Alvis Modelling Language. In: IDC, p. 249-255 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Ricken, B. Vogel-Heuser, Modelling of manufacturing execution systems: An interdisciplinary challenge, 2010 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), p.1-8 (IEEE, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Ligęza, Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka 15.12, p. 210-212 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Silver, B. Richard, BPMN method and style. Vol. 2. (Cody-Cassidy Press, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Lodhi, V. Küppen, G. Saake, Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University. Computer Sciences 43.1, p. 27-34 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  22. BPM Initiative Model Collection, http://bpnmai.org/ [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ligęza, Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services 5.1-2, p. 57-67 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  24. I. M. Weber, Semantic Methods for Execution-level Business Process Modelling: Modelling Support Through Process Verification and Service Composition. Vol. 40 (Springer, 2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Ruohonen, Graph theory, Graafiteoria lecture notes, (TUT, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Vasiliu, P. Tiberiu, “Mircea cel Batran” Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, 18.2, p. 419 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  27. B. van Dongen, R. Dijkman, J. Mendling, Measuring similarity between business process models, In: Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering, p. 405-419, (Springer, 2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Suchenia, P. Wiśniewski, A. Ligęza, Overview of Verification Tools for Business Process Models. In: 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, p. 303-310 (PTI, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  29. K. Kluza, M. Baran, S. Bobek, G. J. Nalepa, Overview of Recommendation Techniques in Business Process Modelling, In: Knowledge Engineering and Software Engineering (Würzburg University, 2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.