Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 29, 2019
1st International Conference on Computational Methods and Applications in Engineering (ICCMAE 2018)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 12
Section Computational Methods in Mechanical Engineering
Published online 15 October 2019
  1. J.R. Vinson, The behavior of sandwich structures of isotropic and composite materials (Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Technomic, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  2. VN. Burlayenko, T Sadowski, In: Shell-like Structures H. Altenbach, V. Eremeyev (Eds.) pp. 415–440 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dynamic failure of composite and sandwich structures S. Abrate, B. Castanié, Y.D.S. Rajapakse (Eds.) (Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Krueger, PJ. Minguet, T.K. O'Brien, Implementation of interlaminar fracture mechanics in design: an overview (Proc. ICCM14, San Diego, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Szekrényes, Delamination ofcomposite specimens (PhD Thesis 2005) [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Samborski, Comp. Struct. 152, 477–487 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D.O Adams, J.A. Kessler, B. Kuramoto, J. Bluth, C. Weaver and A. Gill, Development and evaluation of fracture mechanics test methods for sandwich composites (Proc. FAA JAMS Tech. Rev. Meet., Wichita, KS, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  8. W.J. Cantwell, R. Scudamore, J. Ratcliffe and P. Davies, Comp. Sci. Techn. 54, 2079–2085 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Avilés and L.A. Carlsson, Eng. Fract. Mech. 75, 153–168 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B.F. Sorensen, K. Jorgensen, T.K. Jacobsen, R.C Østregaard, Int. J. Fract. 141, 163–176 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. X.P. Xu, A. Needlwman, Int. J. Fract. 74, 289–324 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S.K. Dwivedi, H.D. Espinosa, Mech. Mat. 35, 481–509 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Feng, F. Aymerich, Comp. Part A 52, 12–22 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. U. Caliskan, M.K. Apalak, J. Sandw. Struct. Mat. (2017) (in press) [Google Scholar]
  15. V.N. Burlayenko, T. Sadowski, J. Appl. Nonlin. Dyn. 3(4), 369–379 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E.V Iarve, K. Hoos, M. Braginsky, E. Zhou and D.H. Mollenhauer, J. Comp. Mat. 51, 2143–2161 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Lekhnitskii, Theory of an anisotropic elastic body (San Francisco, Holden-Day, 1963) [Google Scholar]
  18. P.P. Camanho, C.G. Davila and M.F. de Moura, J. Compos. Mater. 37(16), 1415–1438 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. V.N. Burlayenko and T. Sadowski, Mecc. 49, 2617–2633 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. V.N. Burlayenko and T. Sadowski, Comp. Struct. 108, 354–366 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Wriggers, Computational contact mechanics (Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. K.J. Bathe and E.L. Wilson, Numerical methods in finite element analysis (Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1977) [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Nakamura, C.F Shih and L.B. Freund, Int. J. Fract. 27, 229–243 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D.T.S. Yeung, D.C.C. Lam, M.M.F. Yuen, J. Electr. Pack. 122, 67–72 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Berggreen, Damage tolerance of debonded sandwich structures, (PhD Thesis 2004) [Google Scholar]
  26. ABAQUS User's manual ver. 2016 (Dassault Systémes Simulia Corp., 2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.