Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 29, 2019
1st International Conference on Computational Methods and Applications in Engineering (ICCMAE 2018)
Article Number 03011
Number of page(s) 8
Section Applications in Information Technologies
Published online 15 October 2019
  1. T. Adamus, M. Kerres, B. Getto and N. Engelhardt, “Gender and e-tutoring-A concept for gender sensitive e-tutor training programs”, in in 5th European Symposium on Gender and ICT Digital Cultures: Participation?Empowerment?Diversity, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Andone and M. Frydenberg, “EXPERIENCES IN ONLINE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING WITH AUGMENTED REALITY”, in eLearning & Software for Education 2 (2017), 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Hubackova and I. Semradova, “Evaluation of blended learning”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 217, pp. 551–557, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Andone, R. Vasiu and N. Robu, “ Building a Virtual Campus for digital students,” in IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Amman, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Boateng, A.S. Mbrokoh, L. Boateng, P.K. Senyo and E. Ansong, “Determinants of e-learning adoption among students of developing countries”, The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, , vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 248–262, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Andone, A. Ternauciuc and R. Vasiu, “ Using Open Education Tools for a Higher Education Virtual Campus,” in 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT, Timisoara, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Augustinova, D. Oberle and G.L. Stasser, “ Differential access to information and anticipated group interaction: impact on individual reasoning,”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 88, no. 4, p. 619, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Putrevu, “ Exploring the Origins and Information Processing Differences Between Men,” Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 2001, no. 10, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Lowrie and R. Jorgensen, “ Gender differences in students' mathematics game playing,” Computers and Education, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2244–2248, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Comber, A. Colley, D. Hargreaves and L. Dorn, “ The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes,” Educational Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Li and G. Kirkup, “ Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: a study of China and the UK,” Computers & Education, vol. 48, pp. 301–317, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Whitley, “ Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: a meta-analysis,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Cuadrado-Garcia, M. Ruiz-Molina and J. Montoro-Pons, “ Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe,” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 367–371, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Hung, C. Chou, C. Chen and Z. Own, “ Learner readiness for online learning: scale development and student perceptions,” Computers & Education, vol. 55, pp. 10801090, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Chu, “ How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of elearning among higher aged adults - analyses of gender and age differences,” Computers & Education, vol. 55, pp. 255–264, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Kay and L. Knaack, “ A formative analysis of individual differences in the effectiveness of learning objects in secondary school,” Computers & Education, vol. 51, pp. 1304–1320, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Koh and J. Lim, “ Using online collaboration applications for group assignments: The interplay between design and human characteristics,” Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 481–496, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R.F. Kizilcec, “ Collaborative learning in geographically distributed and in-person groups,” in AIED 2013 Workshops Proceedings Volume (Vol. 67), 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Manske, T. Hecking, I.A. Chounta, S. Werneburg and H.U. Hoppe, Using differences to make a difference: a study on heterogeneity of learning groups., International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS], 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. R.Y. Bayeck, A. Hristova, K.W. Jablokow and F. Bonafini, “ Exploring the relevance of single-gender group formation: What we learn from a massive open online course (MOOC),” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 88–100, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Ding, R.J. Bosker and E.G. Harskamp, “ Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning,” Computers & Education, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 325–336, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.