Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 37, 2021
International Conference on Innovative Technology for Sustainable Development (ICITSD-2021)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 10
Section Innovative Technology for Sustainable Development
Published online 17 March 2021
  1. A.S Rao, N Pasojevic, Z Li, T Dsouza,. ‘Klout score: Measuring influence across multiple social networks’, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Luceri, T. Braun, S. Giordano, ‘Analyzing and inferring human real-life behaviorthrough online social networks with social influence deep learning’, Applied Network Scince, 4(1), (2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Zhang, H. Jia, Y. Diao, M. Hai, Li H, ‘Research on Credit Scoring by Fusing SocialMedia Information in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending’, Procedia Computer Science, 91, pp.168–174, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. S.J. Imtiaz, ‘A Better Comparison Summary of Credit Scoring Classification.’ International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(7), (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Sun, J. Tang, ‘A Survey of Models and Algorithms for Social Influence Analysis.’ Social Network Data Analytics, pp.177–214, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Bagherjeiran, and R. Parekh, ‘Combining Behavioral and Social Network Data for Online Advertising’, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Wei, P. Yildirim, C.V. Bulte, C. Dellarocas, ‘Credit Scoring with Social Network Data.’ SSRN Electronic Journal, pp 234-258, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Gül, Ö. Kabak, I. Topcu, ‘A multiple criteria credit rating approach utilizing social media data.’Data & Knowledge Engineering, 116, pp.80–99, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Yasa, B. Mucan, “How Turkish Banks benefit from Social Media: Analyzing Banks Formal Links”, International Journal of Strategic Innovative Marketing, Vol. 1, pp. 120-129, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. F.M. Masuabi, L.D. Erasmus, ‘Social media service innovation in South African retail banking: A case study’, 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Cheng, J. Wu, S.S. Liao, ‘A study ofcontagion in the financial system from theperspective of network analytics’, Neurocomputing, 264, pp.42–49, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Bollen, H. Mao, ’Twitter Mood as a Stock Market Predictor Computer’, 44(10), pp.91–94, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Rönnqvist, P. Sarlin, ’Bank distress in the news: Describing events through deep learning’, Neurocomputing, 264, pp.57–70, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Cerchiello, P. Giudici, G. Nicola, ‘Twitter data models for bank risk contagion’, Neurocomputing, 264, pp. 50–56, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Rao, L. Kupper, “Ties in Paired Comparison Experiments: A Generalization of the Bradley-Terry Model”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 62, no. 317, pp. 194–204, (1967) [Google Scholar]
  16. Paola Cerchiello, Paolo Giudici, Giancarlo Nicola, “Twitter data models for bank risk contagion”, Neurocomputing, Volume 264, Pages 5056, ISSN 0925-2312,, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Gupta, P. Kumaraguru, C. Castillo, P. Meier, ’TweetCred: Real-Time Credibility Assessment of Content on Twitter’, In: Aiello L.M., McFarland D.(eds) Social Informatics, SocInfo 2014, Lecture Notes in ComputerScience, Vol 8851, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor Francis, ’Extending The Bradley– Terry Model For Paired Comparisons To Accommodate Weights’, (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.