EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 38 (2021) ITM Web Conf., 38 (2021) 02004 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 38, 2021
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.1)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 15
Section Conference Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20213802004
Published online 07 May 2021
  1. M. Herie, Theoretical Perspectives in Online Pedagogy, J. Technol. Hum. Serv., 23(29), 29–52 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Weller, A pedagogy of abundance, Rev. Espanola de Pedagog., 69(249), 223–235 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Alexander, K. Ashford-Rowe, N. Barajas-Murph, G. Dobbin, J. Knott, M. McCormack, J. Pomerantz, R. Seilhamer, and N. Weber, Horizon Report 2019 Higher Education Edition (EDU19, 2019), 3–41 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Loveless, Backwards and Forwards: Reflections on Teaching in a Digital Age, in Digital Expectations and Experiences in Education, E. Elstad (Ed) (Brill Sense, 2016), 241–259 [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Trede, L. Markauskaite, C. McEwen, and S. Macfarlane, Education for Practice in a Hybrid Space: Enhancing Professional Learning with Mobile Technology (Springer Singapore, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. T. D. Cochrane, Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0, Br. J. Educ. Technol., 45(1), 65–82 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  7. C. McLoughlin and M. J. W. Lee, Future Learning Landscapes: Transforming Pedagogy through Social Software, Innovate: J. Online Educ., 4(5), 1–9 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Jimoyiannis, P. Tsiotakis, D. Roussinos, and A. Siorenta, Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for Pedagogy 2.0, Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 29(2), 248–267 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Fucci, The Digital Competence Framework 2.0, EU Science Hub, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomp/digital-competence-framework, European Commission (2015) [Google Scholar]
  10. 7 Things You Should Know About LMS Alternatives, in ELI 7 Things You Should Know (EDUCAUSE, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Coates, R. James, and G. Baldwin, A Critical Examination Of The Effects Of Learning Management Systems On University Teaching And Learning, Tert. Educ. Manag., 11(1), 19–36 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  12. 7 Things You Should Know About Personal Learning Environments, in ELI 7 Things You Should Know (EDUCAUSE, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Dabbagh and A. Kitsantas, Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning, Internet and High. Educ., 15(1), 3–8 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Liu, D. Kalk, L. Kinney, G. Orr, and M. Reid, Web 2.0 and Its Use in Higher Education: A Review of Literature, in E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2009), 2871–2880 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Ivanova and A. Popova, An Exploration of Formal and Informal Learning Flows in LMS 2.0: Case Study Edu 2.0, in IEEE/WIC/A CM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technologies, 2009. WI-IAT ‘09 (2009), 227230 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Meccawy, P. Blanchfield, H. Ashman, T. Brailsford, and A. Moore, WHURLE 2.0: Adaptive Learning Meets Web 2.0, in Times of Convergence. Technologies Across Learning Contexts, P. Dillenbourg and M. Specht (Eds) (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008), 274–279 [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Isaila, Issues about mashup approach in e-learning, Journal Proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education, 1(2), 540–543 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Fiaidhi, S. Mohammed, L. Chamarette, and D. Thomas, Identifying Middlewares for Mashup Personal Learning Environments, Future Internet, 1(1), 14–27 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Popescu and D. Ghita, Using Social Networking Services to Support Learning, in Advances in Web-Based Learning - ICWL 2013, edited by J.-F. Wang and R. Lau (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013), 184–193 [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Moccozet, O. Benkacem, P.-Y. Burgi, H. Platteaux, and D. Gillet, An Institutional Personal Learning Environment Enabler, in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (IEEE Computer Society, USA, 2012), pp. 51–52 [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Torres Kompen, P. Edirisingha, X. Canaleta, M. Alsina, and J. M. Monguet, Personal learning Environments based on Web 2.0 services in higher education, Telemat. Inform., 38, 194–206 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Attwell, E-portfolio: the DNa of the Personal Learning Environment?, Je-LKS, 3(2), 3 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Kesim and H. Altinpulluk, A Theoretical Analysis of Moocs Types from a Perspective of Learning Theories, Procedia Soc. Behavior. Sci., 186(13), 15–19 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Milligan, A. Littlejohn, and A. Margaryan, Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs, J. Online Learn. Teach., 9(2), 149–159 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Cassidy, E. Ortlieb, and S. Grote-Garcia, What’s Hot in Literacy 2018: Going Digital and Disciplinary, Lit. Res. Instr., 58(1), 1–11 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Ng, Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?, Comput. Educ., 59(3), 1065–1078 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  27. D. Buckingham, Defining digital literacy - What do young people need to know about digital media?, Nord. J. Digit. Lit., 1(4), 263–276 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Eshet, Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era, J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Karpati, Digital Literacy in Education, UNESCO Bibliotheque Numerique (UNESCO, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Potter and J. McDougall, Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Johnston, S. MacNeill, and K. Smyth, Information Literacy, Digital Capability, and Individual Agency, in Conceptualising the Digital University: The Intersection of Policy, Pedagogy and Practice, edited by B. Johnston, S. MacNeill, and K. Smyth (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), 105–125 [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Prensky, Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1, Horiz., 9(5), 1–6 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Margaryan, A. Littlejohn, and G. Vojt, Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies, Comput. Educ., 56(2), 429–440 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  34. N. Selwyn, The digital native - myth and reality, Aslib Proc., 61(4), 364–379 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  35. ECDL Foundation, The Fallacy of the ‘Digital Native’: Why Young People Need to Develop Their Digital Skills (2014) [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Bennett and K. Maton, Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences, J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 26(5), 321–331 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  37. D. S. White and A. L. Cornu, Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement, First Monday, 16(9), 4 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  38. F. Wright, D. White, T. Hirst, and A. Cann, Visitors and Residents: mapping student attitudes to academic use of social networks, Learn. Media Technol., 39(1), 126–141 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  39. D. S. White and A. L. Cornu, Using ‘Visitors and Residents’ to visualise digital practices, First Monday, 22(8), 7 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  40. V. Steeves and P. M. Regan, Teaching Digital Citizenship in the Networked Classroom, IJPADA, 5(4), 33–49 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  41. G. B. Gudmundsdottir and O. E. Hatlevik, Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education, Eur. J. Teach. Educ., 41(2), 214–231 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Dinger, Are preservice teachers really literate enough to integrate technology in their classroom practice? Determining the technology literacy level of preservice teachers, Educ. Inf. Technol., 23(6), 2699–2718 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  43. R. Dam and T. Siang, 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process, The Interaction Design Foundation, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process (2019) [Google Scholar]
  44. G. Charosky, L. Hassi, L. Leveratto, K. Papageorgiou, J. Ramos, and R. Bragos, Education for innovation: engineering, management and design multidisciplinary teams of students tackling complex societal problems through Design Thinking, in 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAD’18) (Editorial Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 2018), 1081–1087 [Google Scholar]
  45. J. W. Lim, D. E. K. Tan, C. Wong, and M. Nur Hanani, University Students’ Competencies and Character Qualities Developed in Design Thinking, INTI Journal, 1(20), 1–6 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  46. S. Thompson-Whiteside, G. Melles, N. Anderson, and T. Barrett, Problem Finding through Design Thinking in Education, in Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015), 191–209 [Google Scholar]
  47. G. S. Stager, Papert’s Prison Fab Lab: Implications for the Maker Movement and Education Design, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013), 487–490 [Google Scholar]
  48. N. Gershenfeld, Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop—from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication, New Ed (Basic Books, New York, NY, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Menichinelli, Business Models for Fab Labs, Openp2pdesign.Org, https://www.openp2pdesign.org/2011/fabbing/business-models-for-fab-labs/ (2011) [Google Scholar]
  50. M. Hjorth, O. S. Iversen, R. C. Smith, K. S. Christensen, and P. Blikstein, Digital Technology and design processes: Report on a FabLab@ School survey among Danish youth, Aarhus University, Denmark (2015) [Google Scholar]
  51. K. Trahan, S. M. Romero, R.A. de Ramos, J. Zollars, and C. Tananis, Making success: What does large-scale integration of making into a middle and high school look like?, Improv. Sch., 22(2), 144–157 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  52. L. Angrisani, P. Arpaia, G. Capaldo, N. Moccaldi, P. Salatino, and G. Ventre, Evolution of the academic FabLab at University of Naples Federico II, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1065(2), 022013 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Haldrup, M. Hobye, and N. Padfield, The bizarre bazaar: FabLabs as hybrid hubs, CoDesign, 14(4), 329–344 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  54. E. R. Halverson and K. Sheridan, The Maker Movement in Education; Harv. Educ. Rev., 84(4), 495–504 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  55. R. C. Smith, O. S. Iversen, and M. Hjorth, Design thinking for digital fabrication in education, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact., 5, 20–28 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  56. L. Hohmann, Innovation Games: Creating Breakthrough Products Through Collaborative Play, 1 edition (Addison-Wesley Professional, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  57. A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers (John Wiley & Sons, 2010) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.