EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 (2022) ITM Web Conf., 41 (2022) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 41, 2022
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.2)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Service Science in a Smart Society: Design Research on Smart Working
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20224102001
Published online 08 February 2022
  1. S.P. Osborne, From Public Service-Dominant Logic to Public Service Logic: Are Public Service Organizations Capable of Co-Production and value Co-Creation?, Public Management Review, 20, 2 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Stoker, Public Value Management. A New Narrative for Networked Governance?, American Review of Public Administration 36, 1 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  3. C.T. Goodsell, A New Vision for Public Administration, Public Administration Review, 66, 4 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. D.J. Fiorino, Sustainability as a Conceptual Focus for Public Administration, Public Administration Review, 70 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Dumay, J. Guthrie, F. Farneti, GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines for Public and Third Sector Organizations. A critical review, Public Administration Review, 12, 4 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Törfing, Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument, Public Management Review, 21, 1 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Matheson, J.E. Matheson, Smart organizations perform better, Research-Technology Management, 44, 4 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Pfeffer, When it comes to “best practices” Why do smart organizations occasionally do dumb things, Organizational Dynamics, 25, 1 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Pfeffer, Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor, Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 1 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. K.H. Aggerholm, E.S. Andersen, C. Thomsen, Conceptualising employer branding in sustainable organisations, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16, 2 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Pfeffer, Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people, Academy of Management Perspectives, 9, 1 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  12. R.D. Leon, From the Sustainable Organization to Sustainable Knowledge-Based Organization, Economic Insights-Trends & Challenges, 65, 2 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. B.E. Perrott, Building the sustainable organization: an integrated approach, Journal of Business Strategy, 36, 1 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. H.M. Haugh, A. Talwar, How Do Corporations Embed Sustainability Across the Organization?, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 3 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  15. J.R. Gil-Garcia, J. Zhang, G. Puron-Cid, Conceptualizing Smartness in Government: An Integrative and Multi-Dimensional View, Government Information Quarterly, 33, 3 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. R.B. Denhardt, J.V. Denhardt, The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering, Public Administration Review, 60, 6 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Ansell, J. Törfing, Public innovation through collaboration and design (London, Routledge, 2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Hartley, Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present, Public Money & Management, 25, 1 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Mergel, Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov, Public Management Review, 20, 5 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. M.H. Moore, Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Schendler, A.A. Guenduez, R. Frischknecht, How can smart government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government, Information Polity, 24, 1 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. Politecnico di Milano Osservatorio sullo smart working. Retrieved at: https://www.osservatori.net/it/ricerche/osservatori-attivi/smart-working (2021) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Viceconte, Smart è l’organizzazione, non il lavoro, Prospettive in organizzazione Vol. 13 – Will employees dream of electric sheep? Gli effetti della tecnologia sul lavoro e i lavoratori (2020) [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Torre, D. Sarti, Into Smart Work Practices: Which Challenges for the HR Department?, E. Ales, Y. Curzi, T. Fabbri, O. Rymkevich, I. Senatori, G. Solinas, Working in Digital and Smart Organizations (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Harris, Home-based teleworking and the employment relationship. Managerial challenges and dilemmas, Personnel Review, 32, 4, (2003) [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Dambrin, How does telework influence the manager-employee relationship?, International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 4, 4 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Munir, S.J. Biddle, M.J. Davies, D. Dunstan, D. Esliger, L.J. Gray,..., C.L. Edwardson, Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work): using the behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention to reduce sitting time in the workplace, BMC public health, 18, 1 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Van Wart, Lessons from Leadership Theory and the Contemporary Challenges of Leaders, Public Administration Review, 73, 4 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  29. M. McGuire, Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it, Public Administration Review, 6 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  30. S.P. Osborne, The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance(Routledge, London and New York, 2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Granier, H. Kudo, How Are Citizens Involved in Smart Cities? Analysing Citizen Participation in Japanese ‘Smart Communities’, Information Polity, 21, 1 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  32. T. Janowski, T.A. Pardo, J. Davies, Government Information Networks – Mapping Electronic Governance Cases Through Public Administration Concepts, Government Information Quarterly, 29 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  33. H. Larsson, Ǻ. Grönlund, Future-oriented eGovernance: The Sustainability Concept in eGov Research, and Ways Forward, Government Information Quarterly, 31 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  34. J.M. Bryson, B.C. Crosby, L. Bloomberg, Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management, Public Administration Review, 74, 4 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  35. D. Denyer, D. Tranfield, Using Qualitative Research Synthesis to Build an Actionable Knowledge Base, Management Decision, 24 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Dixon-Woods, S. Agarwall, B. Young, D. Jones, A. Sutton, Integrative Approaches to Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence, Health Development Agency, London, available at www.hda.nhs.uk (2004) [Google Scholar]
  37. S.P. Osborne, L. Brown, Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king?, Public administration, 89, 4 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  38. B.C. Crosby, P. ‘t Hart, J. Törfing, Public value creation through collaborative innovation, Public Management Review, 19, 5 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  39. E. Sørensen, J. Törfing, Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector, Administration & Society, 43, 8 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  40. S. Nambisan, Transforming Government through Collaborative Innovation, (IBM Center for the Business Government, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  41. H. De Vries, V. Bekkers, L. Tummers, Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda, Public Administration, 94, 1 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  42. B. Bommert, Collaborative innovation in the public sector, International Public Management Review, 11, 1 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  43. J. Bertot, E. Estevez, T. Janowski, Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework, Government Information Quarterly, 33 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  44. J.I. Criado, T.F. Dias, H. Sano, F. Rojas-Martín, A. Silvan, A.I. Filho, Public innovation and living labs in action: a comparative analysis in Post-New Public Management contexts, International Journal of Public Administration, 44, 6 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Scupola, A. Zanferi, Governance and innovation in public sector services: The case of the digital library, Government Information Quarterly, 33, 2 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  46. S.S. Dawes, T.A. Pardo, Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems. McIver, W.J., Elmagarmid, A.K., Advances in Digital Government. Technology, Human Factors, and Policy (pp. 259-274), Kluwer Academic Publishers, London (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. S.P. Osborne, Z. Radnor, I. Vidal, T.A. Kinder, Sustainable Business Model for Public Service Organizations?, Public Management Review, 16, 2 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  48. T.H. Harrison, T.A. Pardo, M. Cook, Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda, Future Internet, 4, 4 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  49. F. Buonocore, Dalla digitalizzazione alla trasformazione digitale nella PA. La prospettiva organizzativa, Prospettive in organizzazione, Vol. 13 – Will employees dream of electric sheep? Gli effetti della tecnologia sul lavoro e i lavoratori (2020) [Google Scholar]
  50. I. Mergel, Y. Gong, J. Bertot Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research, Government Information Quarterly, 35, 2 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  51. OECD. Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies, (Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  52. P. Dunleavy, H. Margetts, S. Bastow, J. Tinkler, New Public Management is Dead-Long Live Digital-Era Governance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 3 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  53. D. Linders, From E-government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in The Age of Social Media, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 4 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  54. J. Fishenden, M. Thompson, Digital Government, Open Architecture, and Innovation: Why Public Sector IT Will Never Be the Same Again, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 4 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  55. S. Mellouli, L.F. Luna-Reyes, J. Zhang, Smart government, citizen participation and open data, Information Polity, 19, 1-2 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  56. J.R. Gil-Garcia, N. Helbig, A. Ojo, Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 1 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  57. J.R. Gil-Garcia, Towards a smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond, Information Polity, 17, 3-4 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  58. T. Janowski, Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization, Government Information Quarterly, 32, 3 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  59. S.P Osborne, The New Public Governance, Public Management Review, 8, 3 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  60. S.P. Osborne, Z. Radnor, K. Strokosch, Co-production and The Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment?, Public Management Review, 18, 5 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  61. M. Decastri, F. Gagliarducci, P. Previtali, D. Scarozza, Understanding the Use of Smart Working in Public Administration: The Experience of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers. A. Lazazzara, F. Ricciardi, S. Za, Exploring Digital Ecosystems. Organizational and Human Challenges (Springer, Cham 2020) [Google Scholar]
  62. R. Reina, D. Scarozza, Human Resource Management in the Public Administration, M. Decastri, S. Battini, F. Buonocore, F. Gagliarducci, Organizational Development in Public Administration. The Italian Way (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  63. A. Ravarini, R. Cuel, L. Varriale, Lo smart working nelle pubbliche amministrazioni: un’analisi socio-tecnica del fenomeno, Prospettive in organizzazione, Vol. 14 – Le Sfide del management pubblico: nuovi modelli organizzativi (2020) [Google Scholar]
  64. Politecnico di Milano, Lavoro Agile per il futuro della PA. Approfondimento delle esperienze più significative di lavoro agile realizzate a livello pubblico e privato sia in ambito nazionale sia internazionale. Progetto “Lavoro agile per il futuro della PA” PON Governance e capacità istituzionale 2014/2020, Asse 1, Azione 1.3.5 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  65. F. Butera, Le condizioni organizzative e professionali dello smart working dopo l’emergenza: progettare il lavoro ubiquo fatto di ruoli aperti e di professioni a larga banda, Studi Organizzativi, 1 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  66. L. Gastaldi, M. Corso, E. Raguseo, P. Neirotti, E. Paolucci, A. Martini, Smart working: Rethinking work practices to leverage employees’ innovation potential, 15th CINet Conference (Vol. 100) (2014) [Google Scholar]
  67. F. Montanari, La digitalizzazione degli spazi collaborativi: verso forme blended di lavoro? Prospettive in organizzazione, Vol. 13 – Will employees dream of electric sheep? Gli effetti della tecnologia sul lavoro e i lavoratori (2020) [Google Scholar]
  68. F. Crespi, Lo Smart Working in Italia: la diffusione del fenomeno, Osservatorio Smart Working, Politecnico di Milano (2016) [Google Scholar]
  69. V. Langè, L. Gastaldi, Coping Italian Emergency COVID-19 through Smart Working: From Necessity to Opportunity, Journal of Mediterranean Knowledge, 5, 1 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  70. A.M. McEwan, Smart working: Creating the next wave (CRC Press, 2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. L. Errichiello, T. Pianese, Toward a theory on wrokplaces for smart workers, Facilieties, 38, 3-4 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  72. J.Y. Hur, W. Cho, G. Lee, S.H. Bickerton, The “smart work” myth: how bureaucratic inertia and workplace culture stymied digital transformation in the relocation of South Korea’s capital, Asian Studies Review, 43, 4 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  73. M. Iannotta, C. Meret, Flessibilità, coerenza, integrazione: tre leve per una leadership efficace a supporto dello smart working, Prospettive in organizzazione, Vol. 13– Will employees dream of electric sheep? Gli effetti della tecnologia sul lavoro e i lavoratori (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.