Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 41, 2022
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.2)
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 14
Section Smart Services’ Innovation Design
Published online 08 February 2022
  1. RUS & Gruppo di Studio per il Bilancio Sociale. Il Bilancio di Sostenibilità delle Università (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. CRUI. I Magnifici Incontri Crui 2019 ‘Le Università Per La Sostenibilità – Educazione Universitaria Per La Sostenibilità’ (Position paper) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. (Report and Declaration of The Presidents Conference, 1990) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. V. P. F. Caputo, S. Pizzi. L’offerta di contenuti di responsabilità sociale negli atenei italiani. Un’analisi esplorativa (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Godemann, J. Haertle, C. Herzig, J. Moon. ‘United Nations supported principles for responsible management education: purpose, progress and prospects’, in Journal of Cleaner Production; 62: 16-23 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Gulluscio, P. Torrecchia, T. De Cristofaro. CSR Modules in Catholic and Ecclesiastical Universities in the Italian Territory. In Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 131-156). Springer, Cham (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Traxler. Inclusion in an age of mobility. Research in learning technology; 24 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Pira. Promoting the Social Inclusion of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder via Mobile Technologies (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. Uri: (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Alahmadi, S. Drew. Accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university websites in world, Oceania, and Arab categories for home, admission, and course description webpages. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 21(1): 7-24 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. H. L. Nir, A. Rimmerman. Evaluation of Web content accessibility in an Israeli institution of higher education. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(3): 663-673 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Ismailova, Y. Inal. Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(2): 437-445 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Ismail, K. S. Kuppusamy. Web accessibility investigation and identification of major issues of higher education websites with statistical measures: A case study of college websites. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences (2019) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. K. Kimura. Defining, evaluating, and achieving accessible library resources: A review of theories and methods. Reference Services Review (2018) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. K. Yin. Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press (2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Yazan. Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. B.G. Glaser, A.L. Strauss. Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203793206. (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. P. Calderón Albornoz, P. Rodríguez Herrero, P. Social representations of intellectual impairments in universities: the educational implications of a case study in Chile. Disability & Society, 1-18. (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. A. Fallon. “11. PREPARING INCLUSIVE SPECIAL EDUCATORS: POLICY IMPLICATIONS FOR PARTNERSHIPS AMONG PUBLIC SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, AND UNIVERSITIES”, Alexander, K. and Hunter, R.C. (Ed.) Administering Special Education: In Pursuit of Dignity and Autonomy (Advances in Educational Administration, Vol. 7), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 239-248. (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.