Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 45, 2022
2021 3rd International Conference on Computer Science Communication and Network Security (CSCNS2021)
Article Number 02010
Number of page(s) 9
Section Communication Technology Security Network
Published online 19 May 2022
  1. A. Abdelmaboud, D.N.A. Jawawi, I. Ghani, A. Elsafi, and B. Kitchenham. Quality of service approaches in cloud computing: A systematic mapping study [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2015, 101: 159-179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Kanwal, R. Masood, U.E. Ghazia, M.A. Shibli, and A.G. Abbasi. Assessment Criteria for Trust Models in Cloud Computing [C]. CPSCom 2013: 254-261. [Google Scholar]
  3. P.J. Ryan K.L Ko, Miranda Mowbray, Siani Pearson, Markus Kirchberg, Qianhui and B.S.L. Liang. TrustCloud: A Framework for Accountability and Trust in Cloud Computing [C]. Services (SERVICES), 2011 IEEE World Congress on IEEE, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. S.M. Habib, Trust Establishment Mechanisms for Distributed Service Environments [D]. Darmstadt, German: der Technischen Universität Darmstadt, 2013: 1-184. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Sun, G. Chang, L. Sun, and X. Wang. Surveying and Analyzing Security, Privacy and Trust Issues in Cloud Computing Environments [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011. 15: 2852-2856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lik M., Mojdeh M., Ari H.. A Computational Model of Trust and Reputation [C]. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002:1-9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Q.Z.S. Talal H. Noor. Trust as a Service-A Framework for Trust Management in Cloud Environments [C]. WISE, 2011: 8. [Google Scholar]
  8. L.C. Tian Li-qin. Evaluation of User Behavior Trust in Cloud Computing [C]. ICCSM, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. R.A.R. Shaikh and M. Sasikumar. Trust model for a cloud computing application and service [C]. IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Computing Research, 2012:1-4. [Google Scholar]
  10. S.M. Habib, V. Varadharajan, and M. Muhlhauser. A Trust-Aware Framework for Evaluating Security Controls of Service Providers in Cloud Marketplaces [C]. TRUSTCOM, 2013:459-468. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yan, K. ; Cheng, Y. ; and Tao, F.. A trust evaluation model towards cloud manufacturing [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 84(1-4):133-146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gambetta, D.. Can we trust trust? [EB/OL]. Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Chapter 13, 2000:213-237. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jøsang Audun. Trust and Reputation Systems[J]. Springer LNCS 4677, 2007:1-38. [Google Scholar]
  14. Adali, Sibel. Modeling Trust Context In Networks[M]. New York:Springer, 2013:1-60. [Google Scholar]
  15. Marsh, Stephen Paul. Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept [D]. Stirling: University of Stirling, 1994:1-184. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lu, L.; Yuan, Y. A Novel TOPSIS Evaluation Scheme for Cloud Service Trustworthiness Combining Objective and Subjective Aspects. J.Syst.Softw. 2018, 143, 71–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Momani, Mohammad. Bayesian Methods for Modeling and Management of Trust in Wireless Sensor Networks [D].Sydney: University of Technology, Sydney, 2008:1-185. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sebastian Ries, et al.. A Classification of Trust Systems [C]. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006:OTM 2006 workshops pt.1. 2006:894-903. [Google Scholar]
  19. X. Su, M. Zhang, Y. Mu, and Q. Bai. A robust trust model for service-oriented systems [J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2013. 79(5): 596-608. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Subashini and V. Kavitha. Review: A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing [J]. Journal of Ne twork & Computer Applications, 2011. 35(1): 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Trapero, J. Luna, and N. Suri. Quantifiably Trusting the Cloud: Putting Metrics to Work [J]. IEEE Security & Privacy, 2016. 14 (3): 73-77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Armbrust, I. Stoica, M. Zaharia, A. Fox, R. Griffith, A.D. Joseph, R. Katz, A. Konwinski, G. Lee, D. Patterson, and A. Rabkin. A view of cloud computing [J]. Communications of the ACM, 2010. 53(4): 50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S.-Y. Lin, C.-H. Lai, C.-H. Wu, and C.-C. Lo. A trustworthy QoS-based collaborative filtering approach for web service discovery [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2014, 93: 217-228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Manuel. A trust model of cloud computing based on Quality of Service [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015. 233(1): 281-292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. X.Y. Li, H.D. Ma, F. Zhou, and W.B. Yao. T-Broker: A Trust-Aware Service Brokering Scheme for Multiple Cloud Collaborative Services [J]. Ieee Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2015. 10(7): 1402-1415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Ding, S.L. Yang, Y.T. Zhang, C.Y. Liang, and C.Y. Xia. Combining QoS prediction and customer satisfaction estimation to solve cloud service trustworthiness evaluation problems [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014. 56: 216-225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. S.B.D.e. al. Service Level Agreement Assurance in Cloud Computing A Trust Issue [J]. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 2014, 5(3): 2899-2906. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Alhamad, T. Dillon, and E. Chang. SLA-Based Trust Model for Cloud Computing [C]. 2010 13th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems, 2010: 321-324. [Google Scholar]
  29. M.E.A. Alhamad. Conceptual SLA framework for cloud computing. [A]. 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST 2010) [C], IEEE. 2010: 606-610. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Q.Z.S. Talal H. Noor. Trust Management of Services in Cloud EnvironmentsObstacles and Solutions [J]. Acm Computing Surveys, 2013: 1–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S.M.E.A. Habib. A Framework for Evaluating Trust of Service Providers in Cloud Marketplaces [C]. SAC ’13: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, ACMSAC, ACM. 2013: 1963-1965. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.