Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2022
International Conference on Engineering and Applied Sciences (ICEAS’22)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Computer Sciences
Published online 06 June 2022
  1. T.M.C. Nguyen, D.B. Hoang, T. Dat Dang, Toward a programmable software- defined IoT architecture for sensor service provision on demand, in: 2017 27th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC), Melbourne, VIC, 2017, pp. 1–6, 2017.8215419. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Zamani, S. Sharifian, A novel approach for service function chain (SF) mapping with multiple SFC instances in a fog-to-cloud computing system, in: 2018 4th Iranian Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS), Tehran, Iran, 2018, pp. 48–52, 2018.8700535. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Bae, J. Kim, An experimental continuous delivery framework for smartx- mini IoT-cloud playground, in: 2016 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), Kota Kinabalu, 2016, pp. 348–350, [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Kim, J. Kim, Enabling operation data visibility for smartx-mini IoT-cloud playground, in: 2016 IEEE NetSoft Conference and Workshops (NetSoft), Seoul, 2016, pp. 428–430, 0. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Oguchi, X. Wang, P. Palacharla, T. Ikeuchi, Seamless network service orches- tration across on- premises and cloud infrastructures, in: 2017 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN), Berlin, 2017, pp. 1–2, [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Habibi, S. Baharlooei, M. Farhoudi, S. Kazemian, S. Khorsandi, Virtualized SDN-based end-to-end reference architecture for fog networking, in: 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applica- tions Workshops (WAINA), Krakow, 2018, pp. 61–66, [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Truong, N. Narendra, SINC - An information- centric approach for end-to-end IoT cloud resource provisioning, in: 2016 International Conference on Cloud Computing Research and Innovations (ICCCRI), Singapore, 2016, pp. 17–24, [Google Scholar]
  8. VG. Nguyen, TX. Do, Y. Kim, SDN And virtualization-based LTE mobile network architectures: A comprehensive survey, Wirel. Pers. Commun. 86 (2016) 1401, [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Farris, T. Taleb, Y. Khettab, J. Song, A survey on emerging SDN and NFV security mechanisms for IoT systems, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21 (1) (2019) 812–837, [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Qiao Yan, et al., Software-defined networking (SDN) and distributed denial of service (ddos) attacks in cloud computing environments: A survey, some research issues, and challenges, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18 (1) (2016) 602–622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Celio. Trois, et al., A survey on SDN programming languages: toward a taxonomy, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18 (4) (2016) 2687–2712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Reynaud, F. Aguessy, O. Bettan, M. Bouet, V. Conan, Attacks against network functions virtualization and software-defined networking: State-of-the-art, in: 2016 IEEE NetSoft Conference and Workshops (NetSoft), Seoul, 2016, pp. 471– 476, 7. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Hantouti, et al., Traffic steering for service function chaining, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. (2018) 1. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ola. Salman, Imad. Elhajji, Ali. Chehab, Ayman. Kayssi, Ola salman imad elhajji ali chehab ayman kayssi IoT survey: An SDN and fog computing perspective, Comput. Netw. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. L.I. Barona López, .L. Valdivieso Caraguay, L.J. Garcí a Villalba, D. López, Trends on virtualisation with software defined networking and network function virtualisation, IET Netw. 4 (5) (2015) 255– 263, [Google Scholar]
  16. Iqbal Alam, Kashif Sharif, Fan Li, Zohaib Latif, Md Monjurul Karim, Boubakr Nour, Sujit Biswas, Yu Wang, IoT Virtualization: A Survey of Software Definition & Function Virtualization Techniques for Internet of Things, arXiv:1902.10910. [Google Scholar]
  17. Michel S. Bonfim, Kelvin L. Dias, Stenio F. L. Fernandes, Integrated NFV/SDN architectures: A systematic literature review, ACM Comput. Surv. 51 (6) (2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. J.H. Cox, et al., Advancing software-defined networks: A survey, IEEE Access 5 (2017) 25487– 25526, [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Hatzivasilis, K. Fysarakisa, O. Soultatosa, I. Askoxylakisa, I. Papaefstathioub, G. Demetriouc, The industrial internet of things as an enabler for a circular economy hy-LP: A novel iIoT protocol, evaluated on a wind park’s sdn/nfv- enabled 5G industrial network, Comput. Commun. 119 (2018) 127–137, [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khaled. Almustafaa, Mamdouh. Alenezi, Cost analysis of SDN/NFV architecture over 4g infrastructure, in: The 8th International Conference on Emerging Ubiq- uitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (EUSPN 2017), in: Procedia Computer Science, vol. 113, 2017, pp. 130–137, [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Costa-Requena, et al., SDN And NFV integration in generalized mobile network architecture, in: 2015 European Conference on Networks and Com- munications (EuCNC), Paris, 2015, pp. 154–158, [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Choi, T. Kim, W. TaverNier, a. Korvala, J. Pajunpaa, Agile management of 5G core network based on SDN/NFV technology, in: 2017 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju, 2017, pp. 840–844, [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Zhu, C. Huang, IoT-B & b: Edge-based NFV for IoT devices with CPE crowdsourcing, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. (2018) 3027269,, 15 pages. [Google Scholar]
  24. H.-C. Hsieh, J.-L. Chen, A. Benslimane, 5G virtualized multi-access edge computing platform for IoT applications, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  25. Ricard Vilalta, A. Mayoral, Raul Muoz, Ramon Casellas, Ricardo Martínez, Distributed multi- tenant cloud/fog and heterogeneous SDN/NFV orchestration for 5G services, 2016, Available at (Accessed on September 5, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Gardikis, H. Koumaras, C. Sakkas, et al., Towards SDN/NFV-enabled satel- lite networks, Telecommun. Syst. 66 (2017) 615, [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.