EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 51 (2023) ITM Web Conf., 51 (2023) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 51, 2023
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.3)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 16
Section Service Science General Themes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20235101003
Published online 07 February 2023
  1. Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., Dolgui, A., Franchini, G., Ivanov, D., Nair, A. The Impacts of digital technologies on coping with the COVID-19 pandemic in the manufacturing industry: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 1-24 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  2. Appio F.P., Frattini F., Messeni Petruzzelli A., Neirotti P. Digital transformation and innovation management: Opening up the black box. Journal of Product Innovation Management, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  3. Palmieri, F., Ficco, M., Pardi, S., Castiglione, A. A cloud-based architecture for emergency management and first responder’s localization in smart city environments. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 56, 810-830 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A. Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak, International Journal of Production Research, 58 (10),2904-2915 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., From repeat patronage to value co-creation in service ecosystems: a transcending conceptualization of relationship, Journal of Business Market Management, 4(4), 169-179, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F. It’s all B2B… and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial marketing management, 40(2), 181-187 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Akaka, M. A., Vargo, S. L., Lush, R. F. The complexity of context: A service ecosystems approach for international marketing, Journal of International Marketing, 21(4), 1-20 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Letaifa, S. B., Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B. The role of social platforms in transforming service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1933-1938 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brodie, R. J., Ranjan, K. R., Verreynne, M. L., Jiang, Y., Previte, J. Coronavirus crisis and health care: learning from a service ecosystem perspective. Journal of Service Theory and Practice. 31(2), 225-246 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Akaka, M. A., Koskela-Huotari, K., Vargo, S. L. Further Advancing Service Science with Service-Dominant Logic: Service Ecosystems, Institutions, and Their Implications for Innovation”, In Handbook of Service Science, Volume II, pp. 641-659. Springer, Cham (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. Lytras, M. D., Visvizi, A., Chopdar, P. K., Sarirete, A., Alhalabi, W, Information Management in Smart Cities: Turning end users’ views into multi-item scale development, validation, and policy-making recommendations, International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102146 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Polese, F., Sirianni, C. A., Grimaldi, M., Megaro, A. (Co-) learning and (Co-) evaluation in Scholarly Ecosystem: Challenges and Opportunities in the Covid-19 Era. Improving the Evaluation of Scholarly Work, 113-130, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, M. H., Rust, R. T. Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leone D., Schiavone F., Appio F.P., Chiao B. How does artificial intelligence enable and enhance value co-creation in industrial markets? An exploratory case study in the healthcare ecosystem, Journal of Business Research, 129, 849-859 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaartemo V., Helkkula A. A systematic review of artificial intelligence and robots in value co-creation: Current status and future research avenue”, Journal of Creating Value, 4(2), 211-228 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, F., Hannafin, M. J. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 5-23 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fisher, F., Wallace, R. Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of educational research, 73(3), 277-320 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kietzing, A. M., Orjuela-Laverde, M. C. Increasing Student Engagement In Class Using An Open-Ended Student Response System. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Thurston, A., Topping, K. J., Tolmie, A., Christie, D., Karagiannidou, E., Murray, P. Cooperative Learning in Science: Follow‐up from primary to high school. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), 501-522, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Verhoeven, J. C., Heerwegh, D., De Wit, K. ICT learning experience and research orientation as predictors of ICT skills and the ICT use of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 71–103 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaarakainen, M.-T., Kivinen, O. Teija Vainio Performance-based testing for ICT skills assessing: a case study of students and teachers’ ICT skills in Finnish schools. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0553-9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Fors, U. Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 957-983 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bergdahl, N., Fors, U., Hernwall, P., Knutsson, O. The Use of Learning Technologies and Student Engagement in Learning Activities. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(2), 113–130 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hietajärvi, L., Salmela-Aro, K., Tuominen, H., Hakkarainen, K., Lonka, K. Beyond screen time: Multidimensionality of socio-digital participation and relations to academic wellbeing in three educational phases. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 13–24 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Visvizi, A., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M., Loia, F. Think human, act digital: activating data-driven orientation in innovative start-ups. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 452-478 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kashef, M., Visvizi, A., Troisi, O. Smart city as a smart service system: Human-computer interaction and smart city surveillance systems, Computers in Human Behavior, 124, November, 106923 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Choi, B. Y., Song, S., Zaman, R. Smart Education: Opportunities and Challenges Induced by COVID-19 Pandemic:[A Survey-Based Study]. In 2020 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) pp. 1-8, (2020 [Google Scholar]
  28. Betz, M. R., Partridge, M. D., Fallah, B. Smart cities and attracting knowledge workers: Which cities attract highly‐educated workers in the 21st century?. Papers in Regional Science, 95(4), 819-841 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Florida, R., Adler, P., Mellander, C. The city as innovation machine. Regional Studies, 51(1), 86-96 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Erasmus, M., Albertyn, R. (2014). Knowledge as enablement. Engagement between higher education and the third sector in South Africa. Bloemfontein: Sun Media. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lazarus, J. Embedding service learning in higher education in South Africa: The catalytic role of the CHESP initiative. Education as Change, 11, 91–108 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., Akaka, M. A. Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63-72 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., Storbacka, K. Managing co‐creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British journal of management, 26(3), 463-483 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Streitz, N. A., Tandler, P., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Konomi, S. I. Roomware: Towards the next generation of human-computer interaction based on an integrated design of real and virtual worlds. Human-computer interaction in the new millennium, 553, 578 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  35. Karray, F., Alemzadeh, M., Abou Saleh, J., Arab, M. N. Human-computer interaction: Overview on state of the art. International journal on smart sensing and intelligent systems, 1(1), 137 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Losito, G. (1996). L’analisi del contenuto nella ricerca sociale, FrancoAngeli, Milano. [Google Scholar]
  37. Krippendorff, K. Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human communication research, 30(3), 411-433 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  38. Troisi, O., Visvizi, A., Grimaldi, M. The different shades of innovation emergence in smart service systems: the case of Italian cluster for aerospace technology. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, vol. ahead of print, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  39. Dulock, H. L., Holzemer, W. L. (1991). Substruction: Improving the linkage from theory to method. Nursing Science Quarterly, 4(2),83-87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Peters, L. D. Heteropathic versus homopathic resource integration and value co-creation in service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2999-3007 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lytras, M. D., & Visvizi, A. (2018). Who uses smart city services and what to make of it: Toward interdisciplinary smart cities research. Sustainability, 10(6), 1998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Polese, F., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M., Sirianni, C. Conceptualizing social change, between value co-creation and ecosystems innovation. Marketing as a Social Science: Festschrift für Universitätsprofessor Dr. Dr. hc Helge Löbler, 203, (2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.