EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 51 (2023) ITM Web Conf., 51 (2023) 05001 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 51, 2023
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.3)
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 14
Section Digital Platforms & Services
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20235105001
Published online 07 February 2023
  1. Accenture 2016: Five Ways to Win with Digital Platforms [Google Scholar]
  2. International Labour Organization: Platform Labour in Search of Value. A Study of Workers’ Organizing Practices and Business Models in the Digital Economy (2021) [Google Scholar]
  3. Hagiu, A., Wright, J.: Multi-Sided Platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 43, 162–174 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  4. Reuver, M. de, Sørensen, C., Basole, R.C.: The Digital Platform: A Research Agenda. J Inf Technol, vol. 33, 124–135 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Krcmar, H.: Design and Governance of Platform Ecosystems - Key Concepts and Issues for Future Research. In: Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. Statista 2021: Spending on Digital Transformation Technologies and Services Worldwide from 2017 to 2024, https://www.statista.com/statistics/870924/worldwide-digital-transformation-market-size/ (Accessed: 25.08.2021) [Google Scholar]
  7. Cusumano, M.A., Yoffie, D.E., Gawer, A.: The Future of Platforms. MIT Sloan Managament Review, vol. 61, 46–54 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. Yoffie, D.B., Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: A Study of More Than 250 Platforms a Reveal Why Most Fail. Harvard Business Review, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation. A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. Um, S.Y., Yoo, Y., Wattal, S., Kulathinal, R.J., Zhang, B.: The Generative Architecture of a Digital Ecosystem: ANetwork Perspective. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design, vol. 4 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. Guggenberger, T., Möller, F., Boualouch, K., Otto, B.: Towards a Unifying Understanding of Digital Business Models. In: Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. Asadullah, A., Faik, I., Kankanhalli, A.: Digital Platforms: A Review and Future Directions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., Parker, G.G.: Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age. Information Systems Research, vol. 29, 381–400 (2018). doi: 10.1287/isre.2018.0794 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. J Prod Innovat Manag, vol. 31, 417–433 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, vol. 21, 724–735 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Staykova, K.S., Damsgaard, J.: A Typology of Multi-Sided Platforms: The Core and the Periphery. In: Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (2015) [Google Scholar]
  17. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Information Systems Research, vol. 21, 675–687 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Balancing Platform Control and External Contribution in Third-Party Development. The Boundary Resources Model. Info Systems J, vol. 23, 173–192 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Täuscher, K., Laudien, S.: Uncovering the Nature of Platform-based Business Models: An Empirical Taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. Wester, M., Otto, B.: BlockELM -A Public Blockchain Freight Exchange Protocol. In: Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2021) [Google Scholar]
  21. Evans, P., Gawer, A.: The Rise of the Platform Enterprise. A Global Survey (2016) [Google Scholar]
  22. King, S.P.: Two-Sided Markets. Australian Economic Review, vol. 46, 247–258 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. Economides, N.: The Economics of Networks. Int J Ind Organ, vol. 14, 673–699 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 37, 205–224 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. AISeL, https://aisel.aisnet.org/ (Accessed: 21.06.2021) [Google Scholar]
  26. Scopus, https://www.scopus.com (Accessed: 22.06.2021) [Google Scholar]
  27. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, vol. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002) [Google Scholar]
  28. Ørngreen, R., Levinsen, K.: Workshops as a Research Methodology. Electronic Journal of E-learning, vol. 15, 70–81 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  29. Thoring, K., Mueller, R., Badke-Schaub, P.: Workshops as a Research Method: Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Artifacts Through Workshops. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawai Conference on System Sciences, pp. 5036–5045 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  30. Avdiji, H., Elikan, D.A., Missonier, S., Pigneur, Y.: Designing Tools for Collectively Solving Ill-Structured Problems. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 400-409 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  31. Avdiji, H., Elikan, D.A., Missonier, S., Pigneur, Y.: A Design Theory for Visual Inquiry Tools. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 21, 695–734 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spieth, P., Schneckenberg, D., Ricart, J.E.: Business model innovation – state of the art and future challenges for the field. R&D Management, vol. 44, 237–247 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rohn, D., Bican, P.M., Brem, A., Kraus, S., Clauss, T.: Digital Platform-Based Business Models – An Exploration of Critical Success Factors. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 60, 101625 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Engelhardt, S. von, Wangler, L., Wischmann, S.: Eigenschaften und Erfolgsfaktoren digitaler Plattformen (2017) [Google Scholar]
  35. Stallkamp, M., Schotter, A.P.J.: Platforms Without Borders? The International Strategies of Digital Platform Firms. Global Strategy Journal, vol. 11, 58–80 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bauer, V.P., Eremin, V.V., Ryzhkova, M.V.: Digitalization of the Financial Activities of Platform Companies: Competitive Potential and Social Impact. Finance: Theory and Practice, vol. 25, 114–127 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hermes, S., Hein, A., Böhm, M., Pfab, S., Weking, J., Krcmar, H.: Digital Platforms and Market Dominance: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review and Avenues for Future Research. In: Twenty-Fourth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. Bender, B.,Gronau, N.:CoringonDigitalPlatforms–FundamentalsandExamples from the Mobile Device Sector. In: Thirty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–19 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  39. Herwix, A.: Towards a PANORAMA of Sustainable Solutions. Exploring a Global Learning Partnership for Sustainable Development. In: Twenty-Eigth European Conference on Information Systems (2020) [Google Scholar]
  40. Hein, A., Böhm, M., Krcmar, H.: Tight and Loose Coupling in Evolving Platform Ecosystems: The Cases of Airbnb and Uber. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 295–306 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  41. Fischer, S.,Lohrenz, L.,Lattemann, C.,Robra-Bissantz, S.:CriticalDesignFactors for Digital Service Platforms - A Literature Review. In: Twenty-Eighth European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–16 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  42. Piscicelli, L., Ludden, G.D., Cooper, T.: What Makes a Sustainable Business Model Successful? An Empirical Comparison of Two Peer-to-Peer Goods-Sharing Platforms. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 172, 4580–4591 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Poniatowski, M., Lüttenberg, H., Beverungen, D., Kundisch, D.: Three Layers of Abstraction. A Conceptual Framework for Theorizing Digital Multi-Sided Platforms. Information Systems and e-Business Management, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  44. Täuscher, K., Kietzmann, J.: Learning from Failures in the Sharing Economy. Management Information Systems Quarterly Executive, vol. 16, 253–263 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  45. Nuccio, M., Guerzoni, M. :BigData:HellorHeaven?DigitalPlatformsandMarketPower in the Data-Driven Economy. Competition & Change, vol. 23, 312–328 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kaselow, A., Petrik, D., Feja, S.: Exploring the Success Factors for a Launch of an Algorithmic Consulting Platform Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pp. 58–66 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  47. Briel, F. von, Davidsson, P.: Digital Platforms and Network Effects: Using Digital Nudges for Growth Hacking. In: Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–9 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  48. Karhu, K., Gustafsson, R., Lyytinen, K.: Exploiting and Defending Open Digital Platforms with Boundary Resources: Android’s Five Platform Forks. Information Systems Research, vol. 29, 479–497 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Isabelle, D., Westerlund, M., Mane, M., Leminen, L.: The Role of Analytics in Data-Driven Business Models of Multi-Sided Platforms. An Exploration in the Food Industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 10, 4–15 (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.