Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 51, 2023
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.3)
Article Number 05004
Number of page(s) 15
Section Digital Platforms & Services
Published online 07 February 2023
  1. G. Di Marzo Serugendo, L. Friha, Digital innovation process in the academic sector - The case of the University of Geneva, in International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.1) (ITM Web Conf., 2021), Vol. 38, p. 03004 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Di Marzo Serugendo, L. Friha, P.Y. Burgi, J. Döbeli, A. Wade, M.A. Cappelli, A.F. Cutting-Decelle, M. Vonlanthen, N. Durand, A. Hugentobler, Towards a digital service to help the elaboration, implementation and follow-up of study regulations at the University of Geneva - a hands-on experiment, ITM Web Conf. 41, 03004 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Lautenbacher, B. Bauer, C. Seitz, Semantic Business Process Modeling - Benefits and Capability, in AI Meets Business Rules and Process Management, Papers from the 2008 AAAI Spring Symposium, Technical Report SS-08-01, Stanford, California, USA, March 26-28, 2008 (AAAI, 2008), pp. 71–76 [Google Scholar]
  4. J.V.F. Dombeu, M. Huisman, Engineering Semantic Web Services for Government Business Processes Automation, in Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective - 4th International Conference, EGOVIS 2015, Valencia, Spain, September 1-3, 2015, Proceedings, edited by A. Ko, E. Francesconi (Springer, 2015), Vol. 9265 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 40–54, [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Born, F. Dörr, I. Weber, User-Friendly Semantic Annotation in Business Process Modeling, in Web Information Systems Engineering - WISE 2007 Workshops, WISE 2007 International Workshops, Nancy, France, December 3, 2007, Proceedings, edited by M. Weske, M. Hacid, C. Godart (Springer, 2007), Vol. 4832 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 260–271, [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Bala, G. Havur, S. Sperl, S. Steyskal, A. Haselböck, J. Mendling, A. Polleres, SHAPEworks: A BPMS Extension for Complex Process Management, in Proceedings of the BPM Demo Track 2016 Co-located with the 14th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2016), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, September 21, 2016, edited by L. Azevedo, C. Cabanillas (, 2016), Vol. 1789 of CEURWorkshop Proceedings, pp. 50–55, [Google Scholar]
  7. J.P. Castellanos Ardila, B. Gallina, F. Ul Muram, Compliance checking of software processes: A systematic literature review, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 34, e2440 (2022), [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M.E. Kharbili, S. Stein, Policy-Based Semantic Compliance Checking for Business Process Management, in Proceedings of the Workshops colocated with the MobIS2008 Conference: Including EPK2008, KobAS2008 and ModKollGP2008, Saarbrücken, Germany, November 27-28, 2008, edited by P. Loos, M. Nüttgens, K. Turowski, D. Werth (, 2008), Vol. 420 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 178–192 [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Sapkota, A. Aldea, D.A. Duce, M. Younas, R. Bañares Alcántara, Towards Semantic Methodologies for Automatic Regulatory Compliance Support, in Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Workshop for Ph.D. Students in Information & Knowledge Management (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2011), PIKM ’11, p. 83–86, ISBN 9781450309530 [Google Scholar]
  10. T.H. Beach, Y. Rezgui, H. Li, T. Kasim, A rule-based semantic approach for automated regulatory compliance in the construction sector, Expert Systems with Applications 42, 5219(2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Lohmann, Compliance by design for artifact-centric business processes, Information Systems 38, 606 (2013), special section on BPM 2011 conference [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Maglio, J. Spohrer, Fundamentals of service science, J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 36, 18(2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.