Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 51, 2023
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.3)
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Resilience & Sustainability
Published online 07 February 2023
  1. United Nations. Sustainable development goals (SDGs) and disability. (n.d.). (2022) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. N. Amado, R. J. Stancliffe, M. McCarron, & P. McCallion, Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(5),360-375. (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. B. Glen, Supported decision-making and the human right to legal capacity. Inclusion, 3(1),2-16. (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Sharma, S. Mehra, Prioritizing the needs of young people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence-based summary. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9:470-2. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Presnell, & J. Keesler, Community Inclusion for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Call to Action for Social Work. Advances in Social Work, 21(4),1229-1245. (2021). [Google Scholar]
  6. P. P. Maglio & J. Spohrer, Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36(1),18-20. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. J. Bitner & S. W. Brown, The service imperative. Business horizons, 51(1),39-46. (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Flickr (n.d.). About intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs). (2022) [Google Scholar]
  9. R. F. Lusch and S. L. Vargo, Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. New York: Cambridge University Press. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. P. Fisk, A. M. Dean, L. Alkire, A. Joubert, J. Previte, N. Robertson & M. S. Rosenbaum, Design for service inclusion: creating inclusive service systems by 2050. Journal of Service Management. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Anderson, A. L. Ostrom, C. Corus, R. P. Fisk, A. S. Gallan, M. Giraldo, … & J. D. Williams, Transformative service research: An agenda for the future. Journal of Business Research, 66(8),1203-1210. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. U. Bronfenbrenner, Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. (1999). [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Suarez-Balcazar, A. Agudelo Orozco, M. Mate, & C. Garcia, Unpacking barriers to healthy lifestyles from the perspective of youth with disabilities and their parents. Journal of prevention & intervention in the community, 46(1),61-72. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  14. M. McCain, P. Gill, J. Wills, & M. Larson, Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities of Youth Service Practitioners: The Centerpiece of a Successful Workforce Development System. A Background Paper. Institute for Educational Leadership. (2004). [Google Scholar]
  15. G. King, M. A. Tucker, P. Baldwin, K. Lowry, J. Laporta, & L.A. Martens, L. A life needs model of pediatric service delivery: services to support community participation and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. Physical & occupational therapy in paediatrics, 22(2),53-77. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  16. K. G. Scholl, R. B. Dieser & A. Davison, Together we play: An ecological approach to inclusive recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 39(4), 299. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Blaskowitz, A. Pustorino-Clevenger, R. Carretta, M. Cargiulo, & J. Kraft, Developing inclusive higher-education (IHE) programs for youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities at the intersection of research and practice. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(4_Supplement_1), 7411500014p1-7411500014p1. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Matsuzaki, C. Kaihara, W. Hamamatsu, & K. Shibata, ‘Inclusive’ Accommodation Between Campus and Community. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Kempin Reuter, Human rights and the city: Including marginalized communities in urban development and smart cities. Journal of Human Rights, 18(4),382-402. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Cobigo, H. Ouellette-Kuntz, R. Lysaght, & L. Martin, Shifting our conceptualization of social inclusion. Stigma Research and Action, 2(2),75-84. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Dahan-Oliel, K. Shikako-Thomas & A. Majnemer, Quality of life and leisure participation in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: A thematic analysis of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 21(3),427-439. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  22. M.A. Verdugo, R.L. Schalock, K.D. Keith, & R. J. Stancliffe, Quality of life and its measurement: Important principles and guidelines. Journal of intellectual disability research, 49(10),707-717 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Roy, K. Courtenay, M. Odiyoor, P. Walsh, S. Keane, A. Biswas, G. Marston, S. Thirulokachandran, & K. Munir, Setting priorities for people with intellectual disability/intellectual developmental disorders across the lifespan: a call to action by the World Psychiatric Association. BJPsych international, 18(3),54–57. (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Barile, M. Saviano, F. Farioli & M. Yarime, Towards a Common Framework For Knowledge Co-creation: Opportunities For Collaboration Between Service Science and Sustainability Science. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Messerli, E. M. Kim, W. Lutz, J. P. Moatti, K. Richardson, M. Saidam,… & E. Furman, Expansion of sustainability science needed for the SDGs. Nature sustainability, 2(10),892-894. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  26. United Nations. From exclusion to equality: Realizing the rights of persons with disabilities. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  27. P.B. Dressler, T. K. Nguyen, E. J. Moody, S. L. Friedman & L. Pickler, Use of transition resources by primary care providers for youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(1),56-68. (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. M. Havercamp, G. L. Krahn, S. A. Larson, G. Fujiura, T. D. Goode, B. L. Kornblau, B. L., & National Health Surveillance for IDD Workgroup. Identifying people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in national population surveys. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 57(5),376-389. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  29. Y. Hamdani, Jetha, A., & Norman, C. Systems thinking perspectives applied to healthcare transition for youth with disabilities: a paradigm shift for practice, policy and research. Child: care, health and development, 37(6),806-814. (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. P. E. Wilson, & G. H. Clayton, Sports and disability. PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2(3),S46–S56. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  31. F. L. Wilczenski, P. Sotnik & L. E. Vanderberg, Best practices in service-learning for school-to-work transition and inclusion for students with disabilities. Best practices in school psychology VI, 415-426. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  32. A. L. Horn, K. M. Bean, S. J. Layden, J. E. Terpstra & K. C. Holloway, Building collaborative partnerships to increase postsecondary education opportunities for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. School University Partnerships, 13(2). (2020). [Google Scholar]
  33. A. R. Dilts, The Role of an Introductory Special Education Course in Shaping the Attitudes and Sense of Self-Efficacy of Pre-service Teachers. Rivier University. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  34. P. M. Ajuwon, D. Lechtenberger, N. Griffin-Shirley, S. Sokolosky, L. Zhou & F. E. Mullins, General Education Pre-Service Teachers Perceptions of Including Students with Disabilities in Their Classrooms. International Journal of Special Education, 27(3),100-107 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  35. N. G. Badr, & M. K. Asmar, Meta Principles of Technology Accessibility Design for Users with Learning Disabilities: Towards Inclusion of the Differently Enabled. In Exploring Digital Ecosystems (pp. 195-209). Springer, Cham. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  36. O. Kolotouchkina, C. L. Barroso & J. L. M. Sánchez, Smart cities, the digital divide, and people with disabilities. Cities, 123, 103613. (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Coulter, & J. Oldham, Person-centred care: what is it and how do we get there?. Future hospital journal, 3(2), 114. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. I. M. Busch, F. Moretti, G. Travaini, A. W. Wu & M. Rimondini, Humanization of care: key elements identified by patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. A systematic review. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 12(5),461-474. (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. A. I. Horcea-Milcu, B. Martín-López, D. P. Lam & D. J. Lang, Research pathways to foster transformation: linking sustainability science and social-ecological systems research. Ecology and Society. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  40. M. K. Kertoy, D. J. Russell, P. Rosenbaum, S. Jaffer, M. Law, D. McCauley & J. W. Gorter, Development of an outcome measurement system for service planning for children and youth with special needs. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39(5),750-759. (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. C. Cunningham, G. O’Donoghue, S. Cosgrave, T. Sands, B. Leacy, I. Markievicz, … & N. Shields, Gym staff perspectives on disability inclusion: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-8. (2022). [Google Scholar]
  42. T. S. Jordan, C. A. Weiner & K. F. Jordan, The interaction of shifting special education policies with state funding practices. Journal of Education Finance, 23(1),43-68. (1997). [Google Scholar]
  43. D. Nord, T. Grossi & J. Andresen, Employment equity for people with IDD across the lifespan: The effects of state funding. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 58(4),288-300. (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. GSDR. Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary General Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: Te Future is Now – Science for Achieving Sustainable Development (UN, 2019); [Google Scholar]
  45. R. Costanza, L. Daly, L. Fioramonti, E. Giovannini, I. Kubiszewski, L. F. Mortensen, … & R. Wilkinson, Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Ecological Economics, 130, 350-355. (2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.