EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 52 (2023) ITM Web Conf., 52 (2023) 02002 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 52, 2023
International Conference on Connected Object and Artificial Intelligence (COCIA’2023)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 14
Section Artificial Intelligence and its Application
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20235202002
Published online 08 May 2023
  1. L. Zhou, C. Liang, and X. Hu, “Research on delivery trucks strategy under uncertain interference constraints, ” Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 891–896, 2020, inChinese. [Google Scholar]
  2. K. H. Kim and K. Y. Kim, “An optimal routing algorithm for a transfer crane in port container terminals, ” Transportation Science, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 17–33, 1999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Narasimhan and U. S. Palekar, “Analysis and algorithms for the transtainer routing problem in container port operations, ” Transportation Science, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 63–78, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. W. C. Ng and K. L. Mak, “Yard crane scheduling in port container terminals, ” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 263–276, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Zhang, Y.-W. Wan, J. Liu, and R. J. Linn, “Dynamic cranedeployment in container storage yards, ” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 537–555, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Li, Y. Wu, M. E. H. Petering, M. Goh, and R. D. Souza, “Discrete time model and algorithms for container yard cranescheduling, ” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 165–172, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Chang, Z. Jiang, W. Yan, and J. He, “Developing a dynamic rolling-horizon decision strategy for yard crane scheduling, ” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 485–494, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. X. Guo, S. Y. Huang, W. J. Hsu, and M. Y. H. Low, “Dynamicyard crane dispatching in container terminals with predicted vehicle arrival information, ” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 472–484, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. He, Y. Huang, and W. Yan, “Yard crane scheduling in a container terminal for the trade-off between efficiency and energy consumption, ” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 59–75, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Sha, T. Zhang, Y. Lan et al., “Scheduling optimization of yard cranes with minimal energy consumption at container terminals, ” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 113, pp. 704–713, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Wu, W. Li, M. E. H. Petering, M. Goh, and R. D. Souza, “Scheduling multiple yard cranes with crane interference andsafety distance requirement, ” Transportation Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 990–1005, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Galle, C. Barnhart, and P. Jaillet, “Yard crane scheduling for container storage, retrieval, and relocation, ” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 271, no. 1, pp. 288–316, 2018. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  13. Q. Zhang, H. Dong, M. Ling, L. Duan, and Y. Wei, “Optimization of gantry cranes’ operation path for transshipment based on improved TSP, ” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2020, no. 5, pp. 1–13, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P.-F. Zhou and H.-G. Kang, “Study on berth and quay-crane allocation under stochastic environments in container ter-minal, ” Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 161–169, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. X.-L. Han, Z.-Q. Lu, and L.-F. Xi, “A proactive approach for simultaneous berth and quay crane scheduling problem with stochastic arrival and handling time, ” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 207, no. 3, pp. 1327–1340, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Q. Zeng, Z. Yang, and X. Hu, “Disruption recovery model forberth and quay crane scheduling in container terminals, ” Engineering Optimization, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 967–983, 2011. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Cai, S. Huang, D. Liu, and G. Dissanayake, “Rescheduling policies for large-scale task allocation of autonomous straddlecarriers under uncertainty at automated container terminals, ” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 506–514, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Expo´sito-Izquierdo, E. Lalla-Ruiz, B. Melian-Batista, and J. M. Moreno-Vega, “A study of rescheduling strategies for the quay crane scheduling problem under random disruptions, ” Inteligencia Artificial, vol. 17, no. 54, pp. 35–47, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Al-Dhaheri, A. Jebali, and A. Diabat, “A simulation-based genetic algorithm approach for the quay crane scheduling under uncertainty, ” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 66, pp. 122–138, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ç. Iris and J. S. L. Lam, “Recoverable robustness in weekly berth and quay crane planning, ” Transportation Research PartB: Methodological, vol. 122, pp. 365–389, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. F. Zhou, “Study on resource allocation under uncertainty environments in container terminal, ” Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, 2005, in Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Goerigk, S. Knust, and X. T. Le, “Robust storage loading problems with stacking and payload constraints, ” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 253, no. 1, pp. 51–67, 2016. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  23. D.-Y. Lin and C.-W. Chiang, “The storage space allocation problem at a container terminal, ” Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 685–704, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. B. K. Lee and K. H. Kim, “Comparison and evaluation of various cycle-time models for yard cranes in container terminals, ” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 350–360, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Lu and M. Le, “The integrated optimization of container terminal scheduling with uncertain factors, ” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 75, pp. 209–216, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Yang, N. Sun, H. Chen, and Y. Fang, “Observer-based nonlinear control for tower cranes suffering from uncertain friction and actuator constraints with experimental verification, ” IEEE Transactions. [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Yang, N. Sun, H. Chen, and Y. Fang, “Observer-based nonlinear control for tower cranes suffering from uncertain friction and actuator constraints with experimental verification, ” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, p. 1. In press, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Yang, N. Sun, and Y. Fang, “Adaptive fuzzy control for a class of MIMO underactuated systems with plant uncertainties and actuator deadzones: design and experiments, ” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, p. 14. In press, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  29. J. He, C. Tan, and Y. Zhang, “Yard crane scheduling problem in a container terminal considering risk caused by uncertainty, ” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 39, pp. 14–24, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. F. Zheng, X. Man, F. Chu, M. Liu, and C. Chu, “A two-stagestochastic programming for single yard crane scheduling withuncertain release times of retrieval tasks, ” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 57, no. 13, pp. 4132–4147, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Y. Lu, “Uncertain optimization of joint dispatching of automatic terminal yard equipment, ” Computer Simulation, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 325–328, 2019, in Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  32. Y. Gao, D. Chang, T. Fang, and Y. Fan, “The daily containervolumes prediction of storage yard in port with long shortterm memory recurrent neural network, ” Journal of AdvancedTransportation, vol. 2019, Article ID 5764602, 11 pages, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  33. Y. Wu, N. Sun, H. Chen, and Y. Fang, “Adaptive output feedback control for 5-DOF varying-cablelength tower cranes with cargo mass estimation, ” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2453–2464, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Kang, X. Zhu, H. Sun, J. Wu, Z. Gao, and B. Hu, “Last train timetabling optimization and bus bridging service management in urban railway transit networks, ” Omega, vol. 84, pp. 31–44, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. L. Kang, X. Zhu, H. Sun, J. Wu, Z. Gao, and B. Hu, “Last train timetabling optimization and bus bridging service management in urban railway transit networks, ” Omega, vol. 84, pp. 31–44, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.