Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 64, 2024
2nd International Conference on Applied Computing & Smart Cities (ICACS24)
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20246401011
Published online 05 July 2024
  1. Alger, R. P., Geological use of wireline logs: in Developments in Petroleum Geology-2. Applied Science Publisher, 2(2), pp. 207–272 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  2. Allioli, F., Nicoletti, L., Stoller, C., & Xu, L, Natural Gamma Ray Tool Response Discrepancies: Not Always Due to the Calibration! Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/191669-MS (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. Alger, R. P., Geological use of wireline logs: in Developments in Petroleum Geology-2. Applied Science Publisher, 2(2), pp. 207–272 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  4. Alimoradi, A., Moradzadeh, A. and Bakhtiari, M., 2011. Methods of water saturation estimation: Historical perspective. Journal of Petroleum and Gas Engineering, 2(03), pp.45–53. [Google Scholar]
  5. Archie, G.E., The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics: Journal of Petro¬leum Technology, v. 1, p. 55−62 (1942) [Google Scholar]
  6. Asquith, G.B., Combining Water Saturation/Ratio Method, Moveable Hydrocarbon Index, Bulk Volume Water And Archie Water Saturation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, pp.22–28 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  7. Bassiouni, Z., Theory, Measurement, And Interpretation Of Well Logs. 1st ed. United States of America: Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp.1–200 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  8. Chatterjee, R., Datta Gupta, S. and Pratim Mandal, P., Fracture and Stress Orientation from Borehole Image Logs: A Case Study from Cambay Basin, India. JOURNAL GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 89, pp.573–580 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, M.-Y., Habashy, T. M., Mariana, D. R., Schroeder, R. J., & Taherian, M. R. Spontaneous Potential: Laboratory Experiments and Modeling Results. Society of Petro-physicists and Well-Log Analysts (1995) [Google Scholar]
  10. Clavier, C., Coates, G., and Dumanoir, J., Theoretical and Experimental Bases for the Dual-Water Model for Interpretation of Shaly Sands, SPE Journal 24 (2), pp. 153–168 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  11. Dandekar, A.Y., Petroleum Reservoir Rock and Fluid Properties. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group, pp.1–500 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. Edmundson, H. et al, The Sound of Sonic: A Historical Perspective and Introduction to Acoustic Logging. Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 34(5) (2009) [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, V. & Singer, M., Well Logging For Earth Scientists. 2nd ed. Netherland: Springer, pp.351–530 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, D., Formation Porosity Estimation from Density Logs. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts (2003) [Google Scholar]
  15. Ezekwe, N., Petroleum Reservoir Engineering Practice. 1st ed. Pearson, pp.2–4 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  16. Gartner, J. & Suau, J., Fracture Detection from Well Logs. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysis, 21(02), pp.1–11 (1980) [Google Scholar]
  17. Glover, P.W.J., MSc Notes in Petroleum Geology. Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology University of Aberdeen UK (2000) [Google Scholar]
  18. Heflin, J. D., 1979. Fracture Detection in West Coast Reservoirs Using Well Logs. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1979) [Google Scholar]
  19. Heslop, A., Gamma-Ray Log Response of Shaly Sandstones. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts (1974) [Google Scholar]
  20. Hubbert, M., Natural and Induced Fracture Orientation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, pp.235–237 (1972) [Google Scholar]
  21. Kowalski, J.J. & Asekun, S. O., It May Not Be Shale. SPWLA 20th Annual Logging Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma (1979) [Google Scholar]
  22. Lander, L. A., Silva, A., & Simon, C., Resistivity Logging in Conductive-Mud Environment and High Resistivity Formations. Dual Laterolog or Propagation LWD Tool? Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/177084-MS (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. Lambertini, R., Fracture Identification and Quantification Using Borehole Images: Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. Society of Petroleum Engineering, pp.89–95 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  24. Laongsakul, P. and Dürrast, H., Characterization of reservoir fractures using conventional geophysical logging. Songklanakarin Journal of Science And Technology (SJST), 33(2), pp.237–246 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, Myung W., Connection equation and shaly-sand correction for electrical resistivity: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5005, 9 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  26. Maxwell, S. C., Hydraulic Fracture Height Growth. Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 36(09), pp.19–22 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  27. Nichols, G., Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. 2nd ed. United States: Gary Nichols, pp.1–400 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  28. Osoba, J., Gist, R., & Carroll, H., Porosity Determination From The Density Log In Western Gas Sands. Society of Petro-physicists and Well-Log Analysts (1980) [Google Scholar]
  29. Peeters, M. & Hartley, R., Induced Fracture Height Detection From Wireline Logs. Society of Petropysicists and Well-log Analysts, pp.1–7 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  30. Pickett, G. R., Evaluation of Fractured Reservoir. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 9(01), pp.28–38 (1969) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Plumb, R.A. and S.H. Hickman., Stress-induced borehole enlargement: a comparison between the four-arm dipmeter and the borehole televiewer in the Auburn geothermal well. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5513–5521 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Poupon, A. and Leveaux, J., Evaluation of Water Saturation in Shaly Formations, Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts (1971) [Google Scholar]
  33. Serra, O., Fundamentals Of Well-Log Interpretation. 1st ed. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing (1984) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.