Open Access
Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 69, 2024
International Conference on Mobility, Artificial Intelligence and Health (MAIH2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04006 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Transactions | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20246904006 | |
Published online | 13 December 2024 |
- H. Park and S. Park, “Emerging Trends and Challenges in IoT Networks,” Electronics, v. 13, n. 13, p. 513, 2024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Sayed, “The Internet of Things (IoT), Applications and Challenges: A Comprehensive Review,” JIICET, v. 1, n. 101, p. 20–27, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- S. Dilek, et al. “QoS-aware Internet of Things networks and protocols : A comprehensive survey,” International Journal of Communication Systems, v.35, n.110, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Ja’afreh, et al. “Toward integrating software defined networks with the Internet of Things: a review,” Cluster Computing, v.25, p.1–18, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. I. Owusu et al. “An intelligent traffic classification in softward defined network-iot: A machine learning approach,” in 2020 IEEE International BlackSeaCom, 2020, p. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- M. Jimenez-Lazaro, et al. “Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Method for the Rule Placement Problem in SDN,” in 2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2022, p. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- G. C. Deng et al. “An application-aware QoS routing algorithm for Software defined Networksbased IoT networking,” in 2018ISCC, p.186–191, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- A. Nazari, et al.“The fuzzy IAVOA energy aware routing algorithm for SDN based IoT networks,” International Journal of Sensor Networks, v. 42, n. 13, pp. 156–169, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. A. Neghabi, et al. “Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms for solving the load balancing problem in the SDN,” International Journal of Communication Systems, v. 32, n. 14, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- M. Begovic, S. Causevic, A. Haskovic and B. Memic, “AI-aided traffic differentiated Quality if Service routing and dynamic offloading in distributed fragmentation optimized SD-IoT,” IJERT v. 13, n. 18, p. 1880–1895, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- S. Zafar, Z. Lv, M. Ibrar, N. Zaydi, et al. “DSMLB: Dynamic switch-migration based load balancing for SD-IoT network,” Computer Networks, v. 214, p. 109–145, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Open Neworking Foundation, [Online]. Available: https://opennetworking.org/sdn-definition/ [Accessed: February 01, 2024]. [Google Scholar]
- K. Benzekki, et al. “Software-defined networking: a survey,” Security and communication networks, v. 9, n. 118, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Singh et al. “Quality of service (qos) in internet of things,” in 2018 3rd International Conference loT-SIU, p. 1–6, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- A. Shamsan et al. “SDN assisted loT architecture: a review,” in 2018 4th International Conference ICCCA, p. 1–7 2018,. [Google Scholar]
- K. Dias, M. Pongelupe, et al. “An innovative approach for real-time network traffic classification,” Computer networks, v.158, 2019, p. 143–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Lopez Martin et al. “Neural network architecture based on gradient boosting for loT traffic prediction,” FGCS, v.100, p. 656–673, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Yu, et al. “QoS-aware traffic classification architecture using ML and DPI in Softward defined Networks,” Procedía computer science, v.131, 2018, p. 1209–1216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Kucminski, A. Al-Jawad, R. Trestian and P. Shah, “QoS-based routing over software defined networks,” in 2017 IEEE international symposium BMSB, p.1–6, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- N. Saha, S. Bera et S. Misra, “Sway: Traffic- aware QoS routing in software-defined loT,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 390–401, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- J. Park, et al. “NSAF: An approach for ensuring application-aware routing based on network QoS of applications in Software Defined Networks,” Mobile Information Systems, v.2019, n.11, p.1–16, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. E. Kamarudin, M. Ameedeen, A. Zabidi and M. Ong, “QSroute: A QoS Aware Routing Scheme for Software Defined Networking,” in 2023 IEEE 8th International Conference ICSECS, p. 388–391, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- M. Beshley, N. Kryvnska, H. Beshley, L. Barolli and M. Medvetsky, “Centralized QoS routing model for delay/loss sensitive flows at the SDN-IoT infrastructure,” Computers, Materials & Continua, v.69, no. 13, p. 3727–3748, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Hou, M. Wu et al. “An optimization routing algorithm based on segment routing in SDNs,” Sensors, v. 19, n. 11, 2018, p. 49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Xu, et al. “Routing optimization for cloud services in SDN-based loT With TCAM capacity constraint,” JCN, v. 22, n. 12, 2020 p. 145–158. [Google Scholar]
- D. Chouhan, et al. “Traffic-aware QoS Routing in SD-IoT Using Ant Colony Optimization algorithm,” in Computational Intelligence in Analytics and Information Systems, p.305–318, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- S. K. Keshari, V. Kansal, P. Bansal and S. Kumar, “An intelligent energy efficient optimized approach to control the traffic flow in SD-IoT networks,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, v. 55, 2023, p. 102–952. [Google Scholar]
- V. Tyagi et al. “GM-WOA: a hybrid energy efficient cluster routing technique for SDN- enabled WSNs,” The Journal of Super computing, v. 79, n. 113, 2023, p. 14894–14922. [Google Scholar]
- A. Gasouma, K. M. Yusof, B. Bouallegue, A. M. Ahmed et S. S. Matter, “Routing Optimization for Energy Efficiency in Software-Defined loT and RPL Networks,” Soft Computing, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- F. Naeem, M. Tariq et H. Poor, “SDN-enabled Energy-Efficient Routing Optimization Framework for IloT,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, v. 17, n. 18, 2020, pp. 5660–5667. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Njah, et al. “Parallel route optimization and service assurance in energy-efficient software- defined IloT networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, 2021, p. 24682–24696. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Muthanna, A. Muthanna, M. Hammoudeh, A. Rafiq, et al. “Deep reinforcement learning based transmission policy enforcement and multi-hop routing in QoS aware LoRa loT networks,” Computer Communications, v. 183, 2022 p. 33–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. C. Wang et al. “An efficient route management framework for load balance and overhead reduction in SDN-based DCNs,” IEEE TNSM, v.15, n.14, p.1422–1434, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Y. J. Chen, L.-C. et al. “SDN-enabled traffic-aware load balancing for M2M networks,” IEEE IoT-Journal, v.5, n.13, p. 1797–1806, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- E. Hajian, et al., “A mechanism for load balancing routing and virtualization based on Software Defined-WSN for IoT applications,” IEEE Access, v. 10, 2022, p. 37457–37476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Yao, X. Yuan, P. Zhang, et al. “Machine learning aided load balance routing scheme considering queue utilization,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, v. 68, n.18, 2019, p. 7987–7999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. C. Wang et al. “An efficient route management framework for load balance and overhead reduction in SDN-Based DCNs,” IEEE TNSM, v.15, n.14, 2018, p.1422–1434. [Google Scholar]
- G. S. Begam, et al. “Load Balancing in DCN Servers through SDN Machine Learning Algorithm,” AJSE, v. 47, n. 12, p. 1423–1434, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- A. Montazerolghem et al. “Load-balanced and QoS-aware Software-defined Internet of Things,” IEEE IoT-Journal, v.7, n.14, p.03323–03337, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- K. T. Mehmood, et al. “Enhancing QoS of Telecom Networks through Server Load Management in SDN,” Sensors, v. 23, n. 123, p. 93–24, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- H. Xue, et al. “Dynamic load balancing of software-defined networking based on genetic-ant colony optimization,” Sensors, v. 19, n. 12, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- J. Singh, P. Singh, et al. “Energy-efficient and secure load balancing technique for SDN-enabledfog computing,” Sustainability, v.14,n.119, p. 1–22, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Javanmardi, et al. “S-FoS: A secure workflow scheduling approach for performance optimization in SDN-based loT-Fog networks,” JISA, v. 72, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- F. AL Tam et al. “Fractional switch migration in multi-controller software-defined networking,” Computer Networks, v. 157, p. 1–10, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Hu, J. Lan, J. Zhang et W. Zhao, “EASM: Efficiency-aware switch migration for balancing controller loads in software-defined networking,” Peer-to-Peer networking and applications, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 452–464, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Ali, et al. “ESCALB: An effective slave controller allocation-based load balancing scheme for multi-domain SDN-enabled-IoT networks,” Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, v. 35, n. 16, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- S. Keshari, et al. “A cluster based intelligent method to manage load of controllers in SDN-IoT networks for smart cities,” SPCE, v. 22, n. 12, 2021, p. 247–257. [Google Scholar]
- J. Mayilsamy, et al. “Load balancing in SDNs using spider monkey optimization algorithm for the internet of things,” Wireless Personal Communications, v. 116, n. 11, p. 23–43, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. Saha, et al. “QoS-aware adaptive flow-rule aggregation in SD-IoT,” chez 2018 IEEE GLOBECOM, 2018, p. 206–212. [Google Scholar]
- S. Bera, et al. “FlowStat: Adaptive flow-rule placement for per-flow statistics in SDN,” IEEE JSAC, v. 37, n. 13, 2019, p. 530–539. [Google Scholar]
- W. Li, et al. “A Novel Approach to rule placement in software-defined networks based on OPTree,” IEEE Access, v. 7, p. 08689–8700, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Nguyen, et al. “DeepPlace: Deep reinforcement learning for adaptive flow rule placement in SD-IoT Networks,” Computer communications, v. 181, p. 0156–0163, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Yue, et al. “Rule placement and switch migration-based scheme for controller load balancing in SDN,” chez 2022 IEEE ISCC, 2022, p. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- G. Huang, I. Ullah, H. Huang et K. T. Kim, “Predictive mobility and cost-aware flow placement in SDN-based loT networks: a Q- learning approach,” JoCCASA, v. 13, n. 11, p. 26, 2024. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.