EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 71 (2025) ITM Web Conf., 71 (2025) 01006 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 71, 2025
International Conference on Mathematics, its Applications and Mathematics Education (ICMAME 2024)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20257101006
Published online 06 February 2025
  1. K. Amo-Asante, E. Bonyah, Building students’ conceptual understanding of operations on fractions using manipulatives: A junior high school perspective, MJOSBR. 7(3) (2023) 151–159. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/13381 [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Arcavi, The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math., 52(3), (2003), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Aspinwall, K. L. Shaw, & N. C. Presmeg, N. C. (1997). Uncontrollable mental imagery: graphical connections between a function and its derivative. Educ. Stud. Math., 33(3), 301–317. [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Baker, L. Cooley, & M. Trigueros, A calculus graphing schema, J. Res. Math. Educ., 31(5), (2000), 557–578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Boaler, The Elephant in the Classroom, Souvenir Press, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Boaler J, L. Chen, C. Williams, M. Cordero (2016) Seeing as Understanding: The Importance of Visual Mathematics for our Brain and Learning. J Appl Computat Math 5: 325. doi: 10.4172/2168-9679.100032 [Google Scholar]
  7. J. L. Booth and K. R. Koedinger, Are diagrams always helpful tools? Developmental and individual differences in the effect of presentation format on student problem solving, Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 82 no. 3, (2012), 492–511, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044279.2011.02041.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. E. Kieren, Rational and fractional numbers as mathematical and personal knowledge: Implications for curriculum and instruction, in G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam & R. A. Hattrup (eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching, Routledge, 323–371, 1992. Doi: 10.4324/9781315044606-6 [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Healy & C. Hoyles, Seeing, doing and expressing: An evaluation of task sequences for supporting algebraic thinking. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th PME International Conference, 3, (1996), 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hershkowitz, R., Ben-Chaim, D., Hoyles, C., Lappan, G., Mitchelmore, M., & Vinner, S. (1989). Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and Cognition, (pp. 70–95). Cambridge: University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Ilhan, T. Tutak, H. C. Celık, What is the Predictive Power of Visual Mathematics Literacy Perception and Its Sub-dimensions for Geometry Success? Eurasian J. Educ. Res., 19, 80, (2019), 1–24, Doi: 10.14689/ejer.2019.80.1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. J. Lamon, Teaching Fractions and Ratios for Understanding, 4th Ed. Routledge, NY, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008057 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Lappan. & M. K. Bouck, Developing algorithms for adding and subtracting fractions. In L. J. Morrow & M. J. Kenny (Eds), The Teaching and Learning of Algorithms in School Mathematics, NCTM, 183–197, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. K. Mack, Building on informal knowledge through instruction in a complex content domain: Partitioning, units and understanding multiplication of fractions‖, J. Res. Math. Educ., 32(3) (2001), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/749828 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principal and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM Publications. [Google Scholar]
  16. N. C. Presmeg, Visualisation and mathematical giftedness. Educational studies in mathematics, 17(3), (1986), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305075 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. N. C. Presmeg, Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics: emergence from psychology. In Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, 205–235, (2006), Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. N. C. Presmeg & C. Bergsten, Preference for visual methods: An international study. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th PME International Conference, 3, (1995), 58–65. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Stafylidou and S. Vosniadou, The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions, Learning & Instruction, 14(5) (2014), 503–518, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Squire & P. Bryant, Children’s understanding and misunderstanding of the inverse relation in division, Br. J. Dev. Psychol., 21(4), (2003), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003322535192 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. L. P. Steffe and J. Olive, Children’s Fractional Knowledge, Springer, New York, 2010. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0591-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J. W. Stigler, K. B. Givvin, B. J. Thompson, What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics, The MathAMATYC Educator 1(3) (2010), 4–16. [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Soeharyadi, G. H. Iskandar, Towards a STEAM education platform for indigenous communities: the case of Kasepuhan Ciptagelar, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2773 012024, IOP Publishing, (2024), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2773/1/012024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. X. Vamvakoussi and S. Vosniadou, How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation, Cognition and Instruction 28(2) (2010), 181–209, https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676603 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Zhang, Y. Ding, J. Stegall, J., & L. Mo, The effect of visual-chunking representation accommodation on geometry testing for students with math disabilities, Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract., 27, 2012, 167–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Zimmermann, & S. Cunningham, Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. Washington, DC, (1991). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.