Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 80, 2025
2025 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computer Applications and Artificial Intelligence (ACAAI 2025)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Robotics, Autonomous Systems & Sensor Fusion
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20258003005
Published online 16 December 2025
  1. E. Anderson, T. Fannin, B. Nelson. Levels of aviation autonomy, 2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). IEEE, 1-8. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Álvarez, M. I. González, A. Gracia. Flight procedures automation: Towards flight autonomy in manned aircraft, 2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). IEEE, 1-8. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. Code of Federal Regulations Title 14 Part 25 Appendix D (14CFR25), Criteria for determining minimum flight crew. [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Trotti, A Farinelli, R Muradore. Towards aircraft autonomy using a pomdp-based planner, 2024 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2399-2404. (2024) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Wharington. Autonomous control of soaring aircraft by reinforcement learning. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (Australia). (1998) [Google Scholar]
  6. N. T. Depenbusch, J. J. Bird, J. W. Langelaan. The AutoSOAR autonomous soaring aircraft, part 1: Autonomy algorithms. Journal of Field Robotics, 35(6): 868-889. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. D. J. Wing. The TASAR Project: Launching Aviation on an Optimized Route Toward Aircraft Autonomy. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Dave, G. Choudhary, V. Sihag, et al. Cyber security challenges in aviation communication, navigation, and surveillance[J]. Computers & Security, 2022, 112: 102516. [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Oliver, T. Calvard, K. Potočnik. Cognition, technology, and organizational limits: Lessons from the Air France 447 disaster. Organization Science, 28(4): 729-743. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Xu. From automation to autonomy and autonomous vehicles: Challenges and opportunities for human-computer interaction[J]. Interactions, 2020, 28(1): 48-53. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Downer. Trust and technology: the social foundations of aviation regulation. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(1): 83-106. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. L. Sumwalt, B. Landsberg, J. Homendy. Assumptions used in the safety assessment process and the effects of multiple alerts and indications on pilot performance. District of Columbia: National Transportation Safety Board. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  13. E. E. Alves, D. Bhatt, B. Hall, et al. Considerations in assuring safety of increasingly autonomous systems. (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.