EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 86 (2026) ITM Web Conf., 86 (2026) 01012 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 86, 2026
5th International Conference on Current Research in Engineering and Technology (ICCRET-2026)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 13
Section AI & Intelligent Computing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268601012
Published online 05 June 2026
  1. S. Divekar, A. Sonawane, Leveraging AI for automatic classification of PCOS using ultrasound imaging. J. Biomed. Eng. AI 17, 45–53 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Panjwani, J. Yadav, V. Mohan, N. Agarwal, S. Agarwal, Optimized machine learning for the early detection of polycystic ovary syndrome in women. Sensors 25, 1166 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  3. Z. Zad, V.S. Jiang, A.T. Wolf, T. Wang, J.J. Cheng, I.C. Paschalidis, S. Mahalingaiah, Predicting polycystic ovary syndrome with machine learning algorithms from electronic health records. Front. Endocrinol. 15, 1298628 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Liu, Deep learning models for EHR-based predictive tasks: A comprehensive review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00888 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Barragán-Montero, Y. Cheng, J. Li, Machine learning for PCOS prediction using Chinese clinical cohort data. Comput. Biol. Med. 167, 107527 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Morris, K. Reddy, M. Farooq, Federated learning for privacy-preserving PCOS diagnosis. J. Pers. Med. 13, 124–132 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  7. F.J. Barrera, E.D. Brown, A. Rojo, J. Obeso, H. Plata, E.P. Lincango, N. Terry, R. Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, J.E. Hall, S. Shekhar, Application of machine learning and artifi-cial intelligence in the diagnosis and classification of polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1106625 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  8. S.A. Suha, M.N. Islam, Exploring the dominant features and data-driven detection of PCOS through modified stacking ensemble. J. Med. Syst. 47, 29 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Joshi, R. Gupta, P. Mehta, Deep linear discriminant analysis with varia-tion for PCOS classification. Neural Comput. Appl. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08675-4 [Google Scholar]
  10. M.T. Hdaib, A. Al-Fraihat, M. Al-Smadi, Detection of PCOS using machine learning algorithms. J. Healthc. Eng. 2023, 1–12 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  11. P.A. Denny, F. Noor, A. Shahid, I-HOPE: Detection and prediction system for PCOS using machine learning techniques. Procedia Comput. Sci. 218, 395–402 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Alamoudi, S.A. Khan, R. Alharbi, A deep learning fusion approach to diagnosis of PCOS. Comput. Biol. Med. 152, 106417 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  13. W. Elmannai, K. Elleithy, M.S. Alouini, PCOS detection model based on feature selec-tion and XAI. Appl. Soft Comput. 141, 110262 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  14. T.A. Silva, F. Sousa, P. Carvalho, Stacked learning framework for accurate classification of PCOS. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 81, 104534 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Ravishankar, R. Patil, A deep learning approach for ovarian cysts detection and classification (OCD-FCNN). Comput. Biol. Med. 151, 106354 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Nasim, M.U. Farooq, M.W. Anwar, Novel machine learning approach for PCOS prediction in bioinformatics. Inform. Med. Unlocked 30, 100950 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Danaei Mehr, K. Polat, Diagnosis of PCOS via feature selection techniques. Expert Syst. Appl. 199, 117108 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117108 [Google Scholar]
  18. M.S. Alshakrani, A.H. Altalhi, Hybrid machine learning framework for PCOS detec-tion. Diagnostics 12, 2117 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Tiwari, S. Arora, A. Bajpai, SPOSDS: Smart PCOS diagnostic system using machine learning. Int. J. Med. Inform. 165, 104855 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Swamy, M.V. Sainadh, Hybrid machine learning for early PCOS prediction. Comput. Electr. Eng. 99, 107722 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  21. S.A. Suha, M.N. Islam, An extended machine learning technique for polycystic ovary syndrome detection using ovary ultrasound image. Sci. Rep. 12, 16538 (2022) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.