EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 86 (2026) ITM Web Conf., 86 (2026) 01013 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 86, 2026
5th International Conference on Current Research in Engineering and Technology (ICCRET-2026)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 12
Section AI & Intelligent Computing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268601013
Published online 05 June 2026
  1. M. Shanthini and A. G. Selvarani, “Evaluating Multiplex Biomarkers for Early Detection of Cervical Cancer,” pp. 881–886, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1109/icicnis64247.2024.10823117. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Yusuf, “Systematic Review of Supervised Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Medical Conditions,” Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1101/2022.04.22.22274183. [Google Scholar]
  3. B. A. Leidel, “Deep Learning in Healthcare: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities,” 2022, pp. 27–44. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-2416-3_2. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Yamijala, R. Visalakshi, and K. Srinivas, “Imbalanced data classification using improved synthetic minority over-sampling technique,” Multiagent and Grid Systems, vol. 19, pp. 117–131, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.3233/mgs-230007. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Das, S. P. Nayak, B. Sahoo, and S. C. Nayak, “Evaluating Ensemble Models on Imbalanced Data Sets: A Comparative Study across Varied Minority Class Ratios,” pp. 774–779, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1109/esic60604.2024.10481583. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Hasan, P. Roy, and A. M. Nitu, “Cervical Cancer Classification using Machine Learning with Feature Importance and Model Explainability,” pp. 1–4, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/ICECTE57896.2022.10114548. [Google Scholar]
  7. I. U. Sikder, Md. N. Hasan, R. Jahan, A. A. A. Mohamed, Nahida, and Y. Dirie, “A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Classifiers for Early Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer,” pp. 1–6, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1109/compas60761.2024.10796200. [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Fernandes, J. S. Cardoso, and J. C. Fernandes, Cervical Cancer (Risk Factors) Dataset, UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2017. doi: 10.24432/C5Z310. [Google Scholar]
  9. T. M. Okyay, I. Yilmaz, and M. Koldas, “Evaluating Cervical Cancer Risk Using Machine Learning,” Medical Bulletin of Haseki, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 188–194, 2025. doi: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2025.35220. [Google Scholar]
  10. U. Yadav, V. D. Bondre, S. V. Bondre, B. Thakre, P. Agrawal, and S. Thakur, “Intelligent cervical cancer detection: empowering healthcare with machine learning algorithms,” IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 298–306, 2024. doi: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v14.i1.pp298-306. [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Jiang et al., “Machine learning and deep learning to improve overall survival prediction in cervical cancer patients,” Translational Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 3057–3068, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Suryadi and M. Masrizal, “XGBoost Algorithm for Cervical Cancer Risk Prediction: Multi-dimensional Feature Analysis,” Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 535–541, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.29207/resti.v9i3.6587. [Google Scholar]
  13. https://archive-eta.ics.uci.edu/dataset/383/cervical%2Bcancer%2Brisk%2Bfactors [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Kumar and V. Gota, “Logistic regression in cancer research: A narrative review of the concept, analysis, and interpretation,” Cancer research, statistics and treatment, vol. 6, pp. 573–578, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.4103/crst.crst_293_23. [Google Scholar]
  15. K.-L. Du, B. Jiang, J. Lu, J. Hua, and M. N. S. Swamy, “Exploring Kernel Machines and Support Vector Machines: Principles, Techniques, and Future Directions,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 24, p. 3935, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3390/math12243935. [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Curia, “Cervical cancer risk prediction with robust ensemble and explainable black boxes method,” Health technology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 875–885, May 2021, doi: 10.1007/S12553-021-00554-6. [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Che, H. Hu, X. Zhao, S. Li, and Q. Lin, “Advancing Cancer Document Classification with Random Forest,” Academic journal of science and technology, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.54097/ajst.v8i1.14333. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.