EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 86 (2026) ITM Web Conf., 86 (2026) 01024 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 86, 2026
5th International Conference on Current Research in Engineering and Technology (ICCRET-2026)
Article Number 01024
Number of page(s) 22
Section AI & Intelligent Computing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268601024
Published online 05 June 2026
  1. Steinmetz, J. D., Bourne, R. R., Briant, P. S., Flaxman, S. R., Taylor, H. R., Jonas, J. B., ... & Morse, A. R. F. (2021). Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health, 9(2), e144–e160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alghamdi, M., & Abdel-Mottaleb, M. (2021). A comparative study of deep learning models for diagnosing glaucoma from fundus images. IEEE access, 9, 23894–23906. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056641 [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim, M., Han, J. C., Hyun, S. H., Janssens, O., Van Hoecke, S., Kee, C., & De Neve, W. (2019). Medinoid: computer-aided diagnosis and localization of glaucoma using deep learning. Applied Sciences, 9(15), 3064. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153064 [Google Scholar]
  4. Yadav, V., Dey, B., Baruah, U., Das, S., & Prakash, O. (2025). Machine learning-assisted image analysis techniques for glaucoma detection. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2025(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-025-00668-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Chai, Y., Liu, H., & Xu, J. (2018). Glaucoma diagnosis based on both hidden features and domain knowledge through deep learning models. Knowledge-Based Systems, 161, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.043 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashtari-Majlan, M., Dehshibi, M. M., & Masip, D. (2024). Glaucoma diagnosis in the era of deep learning: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 256, 124888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124888 [Google Scholar]
  7. Raja, H., Hassan, T., Akram, M. U., & Werghi, N. (2020). Clinically verified hybrid deep learning system for retinal ganglion cells aware grading of glaucomatous progression. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 68(7), 2140–2151. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2020.3030085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, X., Xu, Y., Yan, S., Wong, D. W. K., Wong, T. Y., & Liu, J. (2015). Automatic feature learning for glaucoma detection based on deep learning. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18 (pp. 669–677). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_80 [Google Scholar]
  9. Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. (2004). Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Archives of ophthalmology, 122(4), 532. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abdullah, F., Imtiaz, R., Madni, H. A., Khan, H. A., Khan, T. M., Khan, M. A., & Naqvi, S. S. (2021). A review on glaucoma disease detection using computerized techniques. IEEE Access, 9, 37311–37333. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3061451 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biousse, V., Danesh-Meyer, H. V., Saindane, A. M., Lamirel, C., & Newman, N. J. (2022). Imaging of the optic nerve: technological advances and future prospects. The Lancet Neurology, 21(12), 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00173-9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Varma, R., Ying-Lai, M., Francis, B. A., Nguyen, B. B. T., Deneen, J., Wilson, M. R., ... & Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. (2004). Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology, 111(8), 1439–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.025 [Google Scholar]
  13. Weinreb, R. N., Bowd, C., Moghimi, S., Tafreshi, A., Rausch, S., & Zangwill, L. M. (2019). Ophthalmic diagnostic imaging: glaucoma. High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology: New Frontiers in Biomedical Optics, 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16638-0_5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Watanabe, T., Hiratsuka, Y., Kita, Y., Tamura, H., Kawasaki, R., Yokoyama, T., & Yamada, M. (2022). Combining optical coherence tomography and fundus photography to improve glaucoma screening. Diagnostics, 12(5), 1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051100 [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, F., Yan, L., Wang, Y., Shi, J., Chen, H., Zhang, X., & Zhou, K. (2020). Deep learning-based automated detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy on color fundus photographs. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 258, 851–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04609-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Raghunathan, T., Mishra, A., Mahur, A. K., & Balaji, B. (2024, March). Multi-Modal AI/ML Integration for Precision Glaucoma Detection: A Comprehensive Analysis using Optical Coherence Tomography, Fundus Imaging, RNFL, and Vessel Density. In 2024 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications Theme: Healthcare and Internet of Things (AIMLA) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMLA59606.2024.10531451 [Google Scholar]
  17. Song, D., Fu, B., Li, F., Xiong, J., He, J., Zhang, X., & Qiao, Y. (2021). Deep relation transformer for diagnosing glaucoma with optical coherence tomography and visual field function. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 40(9), 2392–2402. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2021.3077484 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lalkhen, A. G., & McCluskey, A. (2008). Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. Continuing education in anaesthesia, critical care & pain, 8(6), 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn041 [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Stralen, K. J., Stel, V. S., Reitsma, J. B., Dekker, F. W., Zoccali, C., & Jager, K. J. (2009). Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy. Kidney international, 75(12), 1257–1263. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.92 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar, R., & Indrayan, A. (2011). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian pediatrics, 48, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0055-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hung, K. H., Kao, Y. C., Tang, Y. H., Chen, Y. T., Wang, C. H., Wang, Y. C., & Lee, O. K. S. (2022). Application of a deep learning system in glaucoma screening and further classification with colour fundus photographs: a case control study. BMC ophthalmology, 22(1), 483. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02730-2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Orlando, J. I., Fu, H., Breda, J. B., Van Keer, K., Bathula, D. R., Diaz-Pinto, A., ... & Bogunović, H. (2020). Refuge challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs. Medical image analysis, 59, 101570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.101570 [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, L., Xu, M., Liu, H., Li, Y., Wang, X., Jiang, L., ... & Wang, N. (2019). A large-scale database and a CNN model for attention-based glaucoma detection. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 39(2), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2927226 [Google Scholar]
  24. Batista, F. J. F., Diaz-Aleman, T., Sigut, J., Alayon, S., Arnay, R., & Angel-Pereira, D. (2020). Rim-one dl: A unified retinal image database for assessing glaucoma using deep learning. Image Analysis and Stereology, 39(3), 161–167. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9806-2477 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lemij, H. G., de Vente, C., Sánchez, C. I., & Vermeer, K. A. (2023). Characteristics of a large, labeled data set for the training of artificial intelligence for glaucoma screening with fundus photographs. Ophthalmology Science, 3(3), 100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2023.100300 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kovalyk, O., Morales-Sánchez, J., Verdú-Monedero, R., Sellés-Navarro, I., Palazón-Cabanes, A., & Sancho-Gómez, J. L. (2022). PAPILA: Dataset with fundus images and clinical data of both eyes of the same patient for glaucoma assessment. Scientific Data, 9(1), 291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01388-1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Khan, S. D., Basalamah, S., & Lbath, A. (2025). A novel deep learning framework for retinal disease detection leveraging contextual and local features cues from retinal images. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-025-03314-0 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cen, L. P., Ji, J., Lin, J. W., Ju, S. T., Lin, H. J., Li, T. P., & Zhang, M. (2021). Automatic detection of 39 fundus diseases and conditions in retinal photographs using deep neural networks. Nature communications, 12(1), 4828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25138-w [Google Scholar]
  29. Soltanian-Zadeh, S., Kurokawa, K., Liu, Z., Zhang, F., Saeedi, O., Hammer, D. X., ... & Farsiu, S. (2021). Weakly supervised individual ganglion cell segmentation from adaptive optics OCT images for glaucomatous damage assessment. Optica, 8(5), 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.418274 [Google Scholar]
  30. Fu, H., Li, F., Sun, X., Cao, X., Liao, J., Orlando, J. I., & iChallenge-PACG study group. (2020). Age challenge: angle closure glaucoma evaluation in anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Medical Image Analysis, 66, 101798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101798 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sivaswamy, J., Krishnadas, S. R., Joshi, G. D., Jain, M., & Tabish, A. U. S. (2014, April). Drishtigs: Retinal image dataset for optic nerve head (onh) segmentation. In 2014 IEEE 11th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI) (pp. 53–56). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2014.6867807 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gao, M., Jiang, H., Zhu, L., Jiang, Z., Geng, M., Ren, Q., & Lu, Y. (2023). Discriminative ensemble meta-learning with co-regularization for rare fundus diseases diagnosis. Medical Image Analysis, 89, 102884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102884 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dixit, A., Yohannan, J., & Boland, M. V. (2021). Assessing glaucoma progression using machine learning trained on longitudinal visual field and clinical data. Ophthalmology, 128(7), 1016–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.020 [Google Scholar]
  34. Al-Bander, B., Al-Nuaimy, W., Al-Taee, M. A., & Zheng, Y. (2017, March). Automated glaucoma diagnosis using deep learning approach. In 2017 14th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD) (pp. 207–210). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2017.8166974 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kashyap, R., Nair, R., Gangadharan, S. M. P., Botto-Tobar, M., Farooq, S., & Rizwan, A. (2022, December). Glaucoma detection and classification using improved U-Net Deep Learning Model. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 12, p. 2497). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122497 [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, L., Xu, M., Wang, X., Jiang, L., & Liu, H. (2019). Attention based glaucoma detection: A large-scale database and CNN model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 10571–10580). [Google Scholar]
  37. Raghavendra, U., Fujita, H., Bhandary, S. V., Gudigar, A., Tan, J. H., & Acharya, U. R. (2018). Deep convolution neural network for accurate diagnosis of glaucoma using digital fundus images. Information Sciences, 441, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.01.051 [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson, A. C., Jammal, A. A., Berchuck, S. I., Mariottoni, E. B., & Medeiros, F. A. (2020). Assessment of a segmentation-free deep learning algorithm for diagnosing glaucoma from optical coherence tomography scans. JAMA ophthalmology, 138(4), 333–339. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.5983 [Google Scholar]
  39. Xu, Y., Hu, M., Liu, H., Yang, H., Wang, H., Lu, S., ... & Wang, N. (2021). A hierarchical deep learning approach with transparency and interpretability based on small samples for glaucoma diagnosis. NPJ digital medicine, 4(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00417-4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schottenhamml, J., Würfl, T., Ploner, S., Husvogt, L., Lämmer, R., Hohberger, B., ... & Mardin, C. (2024). Impact of acquisition area on deep-learning-based glaucoma detection in different plexuses in OCTA. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 20414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71235-3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, X., Chen, H., Ran, A. R., Luo, L., Chan, P. P., Tham, C. C., & Heng, P. A. (2020). Towards multi-center glaucoma OCT image screening with semi-supervised joint structure and function multi-task learning. Medical Image Analysis, 63, 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101695 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liao, W., Zou, B., Zhao, R., Chen, Y., He, Z., & Zhou, M. (2019). Clinical interpretable deep learning model for glaucoma diagnosis. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 24(5), 1405–1412. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.2949075 [Google Scholar]
  43. Xue, Y., Zhu, J., Huang, X., Xu, X., Li, X., Zheng, Y., & Si, K. (2022). A multi-feature deep learning system to enhance glaucoma severity diagnosis with high accuracy and fast speed. Journal of biomedical informatics, 136, 104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104233 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jun, T. J., Eom, Y., Kim, D., Kim, C., Park, J. H., Nguyen, H. M., ... & Kim, D. (2021). TRk-CNN: transferable ranking-CNN for image classification of glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and normal eyes. Expert Systems with Applications, 182, 115211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115211 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hemelings, R., Elen, B., Barbosa-Breda, J., Blaschko, M. B., De Boever, P., & Stalmans, I. (2021). Deep learning on fundus images detects glaucoma beyond the optic disc. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 20313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99605-1 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu, J., Yu, S., Chen, W., Ma, K., Fu, R., Liu, H., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Leveraging undiagnosed data for glaucoma classification with teacher-student learning. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, October 4–8, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 23 (pp. 731–740). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_71 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hemelings, R., Elen, B., Schuster, A. K., Blaschko, M. B., Barbosa-Breda, J., Hujanen, P., ... & Stalmans, I. (2023). A generalizable deep learning regression model for automated glaucoma screening from fundus images. NPJ digital medicine, 6(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00857-0 [Google Scholar]
  48. Noury, E., Mannil, S. S., Chang, R. T., Ran, A. R., Cheung, C. Y., Thapa, S. S., ... & Zadeh, R. (2022). Deep learning for glaucoma detection and identification of novel diagnostic areas in diverse real-world datasets. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 11(5), 11–11. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.5.11 [Google Scholar]
  49. Velpula, V. K., Sharma, D., Sharma, L. D., Roy, A., Bhuyan, M. K., Alfarhood, S., & Safran, M. (2024). Glaucoma detection with explainable AI using convolutional neural networks based feature extraction and machine learning classifiers. IET Image Processing, 18(13), 3827–3853. https://doi.org/10.1049/ipr2.13211 [Google Scholar]
  50. Islami, F., & Defit, S. (2024). Customized Convolutional Neural Network for Glaucoma Detection in Retinal Fundus Images. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 4606–4613. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.7614 [Google Scholar]
  51. Hervella, Á. S., Rouco, J., Novo, J., & Ortega, M. (2022). End-to-end multi-task learning for simultaneous optic disc and cup segmentation and glaucoma classification in eye fundus images. Applied Soft Computing, 116, 108347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108347 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pascal, L., Perdomo, O. J., Bost, X., Huet, B., Otálora, S., & Zuluaga, M. A. (2022). Multi-task deep learning for glaucoma detection from color fundus images. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 12361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16262-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Singh, M., Vivek, B. S., Gubbi, J., & Pal, A. (2024). Prototype-based Interpretable Model for Glaucoma Detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 5056–5065). [Google Scholar]
  54. Jiang, Y., Duan, L., Cheng, J., Gu, Z., Xia, H., Fu, H., & Liu, J. (2019). JointRCNN: a region-based convolutional neural network for optic disc and cup segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 67(2), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2913211 [Google Scholar]
  55. Dosovitskiy, A. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhao, R., Chen, X., Chen, Z., & Li, S. (2022). Diagnosing glaucoma on imbalanced data with self-ensemble dual-curriculum learning. Medical image analysis, 75, 102295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102295 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhao, R., Chen, X., Chen, Z., & Li, S. (2020). EGDCL: An adaptive curriculum learning framework for unbiased glaucoma diagnosis. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXI 16 (pp. 190–205). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58589-1_12 [Google Scholar]
  58. García, G., Del Amor, R., Colomer, A., Verdú-Monedero, R., Morales-Sánchez, J., & Naranjo, V. (2021). Circumpapillary OCT-focused hybrid learning for glaucoma grading using tailored prototypical neural networks. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 118, 102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102132 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. George, Y., Antony, B. J., Ishikawa, H., Wollstein, G., Schuman, J. S., & Garnavi, R. (2020). Attention-guided 3D-CNN framework for glaucoma detection and structural-functional association using volumetric images. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 24(12), 3421–3430. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2020.3001019 [Google Scholar]
  60. Cho, Y. S., Song, H. J., Han, J. H., & Kim, Y. S. (2024). Attention Mechanism-Based Glaucoma Classification Model Using Retinal Fundus Images. Sensors, 24(14), 4684. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144684 [Google Scholar]
  61. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27. [Google Scholar]
  62. Guo, Y., Peng, Y., Sun, J., Li, D., & Zhang, B. (2022). DSLN: Dual-tutor student learning network for multiracial glaucoma detection. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(14), 11885–11910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07078-8 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lenka, S., Mayaluri, Z. L., & Panda, G. (2024). Retinal fundus image enhancement using an ensemble framework for accurate glaucoma detection. Neural Computing and Applications, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10500-y [Google Scholar]
  64. Thiéry, A. H., Braeu, F., Tun, T. A., Aung, T., & Girard, M. J. (2023). Medical application of geometric deep learning for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 12(2), 23–23. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.2.23 [Google Scholar]
  65. Braeu, F. A., Thiéry, A. H., Tun, T. A., Kadziauskiene, A., Barbastathis, G., Aung, T., & Girard, M. J. (2023). Geometric deep learning to identify the critical 3D structural features of the optic nerve head for glaucoma diagnosis. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 250, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2023.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  66. Yu, S., Zhou, H. Y., Ma, K., Bian, C., Chu, C., Liu, H., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Difficulty-aware glaucoma classification with multi-rater consensus modeling. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, October 4–8, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 23 (pp. 741–750). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_72 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sivakumar, R., & Penkova, A. (2025). Enhancing glaucoma detection through multi-modal integration of retinal images and clinical biomarkers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 143, 110010. [Google Scholar]
  68. Musthafa, N. (2023, July). Precise Localization of Optic Disc Region for Accurate Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Deep Reinforcement Learning. In 2023 International Conference on Innovations in Engineering and Technology (ICIET) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET57285.2023.10220844 [Google Scholar]
  69. Abbas, Y., Hadi, H. J., Aziz, K., Ahmed, N., Akhtar, M. U., Alshara, M. A., & Chakrabarti, P. (2025). Reinforcement-based leveraging transfer learning for multiclass optical coherence tomography images classification. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 6193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89831-2 [Google Scholar]
  70. Rezaei, M., Vahidi, A., Bischl, B., Wang, M., Elze, T., & Eslami, M. (2023). Self-supervised learning and self-labeling framework for retina glaucoma detection. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 64(8), 352–352. [Google Scholar]
  71. Liao, C., Todo, Y., & Tang, Z. (2025). Integrating self-supervised learning with vision transformers for glaucoma detection. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 34(2), 023016–023016. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.34.2.023016 [Google Scholar]
  72. Veena, H.N., Patil, K.K., Vanajakshi, P. et al. An Enhanced RNN-LSTM Model for Fundus Image Classification to Diagnose Glaucoma. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 514 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-02867-5 [Google Scholar]
  73. Gheisari, S., Shariflou, S., Phu, J., Kennedy, P. J., Agar, A., Kalloniatis, M., & Golzan, S. M. (2021). A combined convolutional and recurrent neural network for enhanced glaucoma detection. Scientific reports, 11(1), 1945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81554-4 [Google Scholar]
  74. Nawar, Y., Soliman, N., Wassel, M., ElHabebe, M., Adly, N., Torki, M., ... & Ahmed, I. (2025, February). DiffuPT: Class Imbalance Mitigation for Glaucoma Detection via Diffusion Based Generation and Model Pretraining. In 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (pp. 4098–4107). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV61041.2025.00403 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, Y., Huang, K., Yang, X., Ma, X., Wu, J., Wang, N., ... & Heng, P. A. (2024, October). Coarse-to-Fine Latent Diffusion Model for Glaucoma Forecast on Sequential Fundus Images. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (pp. 166–176). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72086-4_16 [Google Scholar]
  76. Chincholi, F., & Koestler, H. (2024). Transforming glaucoma diagnosis: transformers at the forefront. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1324109. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1324109 [Google Scholar]
  77. García, G., Colomer, A., & Naranjo, V. (2021). Glaucoma detection from raw SD-OCT volumes: a novel approach focused on spatial dependencies. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 200, 105855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105855 [Google Scholar]
  78. Aljohani, A., & Aburasain, R. Y. (2024). A hybrid framework for glaucoma detection through federated machine learning and deep learning models. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02518-y [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.