EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 87 (2026) ITM Web Conf., 87 (2026) 01023 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 87, 2026
2nd International Conference on Computing Paradigms (ICCP-2026)
Article Number 01023
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268701023
Published online 30 June 2026
  1. O.N. Akande, O. Gbenle, O.C. Abikoye, R.G. Jimoh, H.B. Akande, A.O. Balogun, and A. Fatokun, “SMSPROTECT: An automatic smish- ing detection mobile application,” ICT Express, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 168–176, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.icte.2022.05.009. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Kalla, F. Samaah, N. Smith, and K. Polimetla, “Phishing email detection using BERT-LSTM hybrid model,” Eur. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 42–54, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10717264. [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Lim, R. Huerta, A. Sotelo, A. Quintela, and P. Kumar, “EXPLICATE: Enhancing phishing detection through explainable AI and LLM-powered interpretability,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20796, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Cao et al., “PhishAgent: A robust multimodal agent for phishing webpage detection,” in Proc. 39th AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. (AAAI-25), 2025, pp. 27870–27877. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Alsufyani and S. Alajmani, “Detecting SMS phishing based on Arabic text-content using deep learning,” IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Al-Sabbagh, K. Hamze, S. Khan, and M. Elkhodr, “An enhanced K- means clustering algorithm for phishing attack detections,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 3677, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13183677. [Google Scholar]
  7. M.K. Mehmood, H. Arshad, M. Alawida, and A. Mehmood, “Enhancing smishing detection: A deep learning approach for improved accuracy and reduced false positives,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 137176–137193, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3460338. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Twum, R. Sarpong, A.K. Adomako, A. Agusah, B. Poornima, and K. Diallo, “Evaluation of machine learning techniques for identifying phishing emails: A case study with the SpamAssassin dataset,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM), vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.55041/IJS-REM45149. [Google Scholar]
  9. R.S. Rao, C. Kondaiah, A.R. Pais, and B. Lee, “A hybrid super learner ensemble for phishing detection on mobile devices,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 16839, May 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02009. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Shinde, E.Q. Shahra, S. Basurra, F. Saeed, A.A. AlSewari, and W.A. Jabbar, “SMS Scam Detection Application Based on Optical Character Recognition for Image Data Using Unsupervised and Deep Semi-Supervised Learning,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 18, p. 6084, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24186084. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Aslam, H. Aslam, A. Manzoor, H. Chen, and A. Rasool, “AntiPhishStack: LSTM-Based Stacked Generalization Model for Optimized Phishing URL Detection,” Symmetry, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 248, 2024, doi: 10.3390/sym16020248. [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Mahmud, M.A.H. Prince, M.H. Ali, M.S. Hossain, and K. Andersson, “Enhancing Cybersecurity: Hybrid Deep Learning Approaches to Smishing Attack Detection,” Systems, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 490, 2024, doi: 10.3390/systems12110490. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Timko, D.H. Castillo, and M.L. Rahman, “Understanding Influences on SMS Phishing Detection: User Behavior, Demographics, and Message Attributes,” in Symposium on Usable Security and Privacy (USEC), San Diego, CA, USA, 2025, doi: 10.14722/usec.2025.23027. [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Althobaiti and A. Alharbi, “Intelligent Deep Learning Model for Privacy Preserving Secure Smishing Detection System,” International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1–10, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  15. A.M. Alsalamah, A.M. Alharbi, A.M. Alqahtani, M.M. Alqahtani, and S.I. Alayed, “Deep Learning for Smishing Attack Detection on SMS Contents in the Arabic Language,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 193536–193546, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3505677. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.