Open Access
| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 87, 2026
2nd International Conference on Computing Paradigms (ICCP-2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01024 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268701024 | |
| Published online | 30 June 2026 | |
- S.W. Nourildean, Y.A. Mohammed, and H.A. Attallah, “Virtual Local Area Network Performance Improvement Using Ad Hoc Routing Protocols in a Wireless Network,” Computers, vol. 12, no. 2, art. 28, Jan. 2023. doi: 10.3390/computers12020028. [Google Scholar]
- U. Rastogi, “Congestion Control Using Software Defined Network,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4495940. [Google Scholar]
- C. Okoh, “Enhancing Data Security Through VLSM Subnetting and Enhanced Network Topology,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 23, 2024. doi: 10.3390/app142310968. [Google Scholar]
- R. Alvarado et al., “Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation with Machine Learning in VLAN-Linked Networks,” Facets, 2025. doi: 10.1139/facets-2024-0128. [Google Scholar]
- G. Song, “Using MSPG to Suppress Flooding in the Data-Link Layer,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2024, Article 9696548, 2024. doi: 10.1155/2024/9696548 [Google Scholar]
- M.A. Al-Maamari, “Analysis of RSTP Synchronization Performance and Its Security Features in Simulation Networks,” ResearchGate Preprint, Dec. 2025 [Google Scholar]
- P. Prasad, “Enhancing Security in Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Through Real-Time Monitoring and Threat Detection,” Master’s thesis, University of Turku, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- J. Hall and D.K. Mullins, “Availability Attacks Without an Adversary,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04216, Feb. 2026 [Google Scholar]
- X. Etxezarreta, J. Uribeetxeberria, and A. Arrieta, “Software-Defined Networking Approaches for Intrusion Response in Industrial Control Systems: A Survey,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 220, pp. 1053–1060, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- IEEE Standards Association, “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks (IEEE 802.1Q),” IEEE, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Chandrappa, S., Guru Prasad, H.N. Naveen Kumar, J. Praveen Gujjar, M.A. Kumar, and A. Kukreti. "Detection of Transmission Control Protocol XMAS Attack Using Pattern Analysis with MONOSEK." (2023). [Google Scholar]
- M. Casado et al., “Ethane: Taking Control of the Enterprise,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- T. Benson, A. Akella, and D.A. Maltz, “Network Traffic Characteristics of Data Centers in the Wild,” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- R. Perlman, “An Algorithm for Distributed Computation of a Spanning Tree in an Extended LAN,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 44–53, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- S. Sharma et al., “Implementation of VLAN for Secure and Efficient Network Management,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 178, no. 7, pp. 12–18, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- A. Lara, A. Kolasani, and B. Ramamurthy, “Network Innovation using OpenFlow: A Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 493–512, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- M. Channegowda et al., “Software Defined Optical Networks Technology and Infrastructure: Enabling Software-Defined Optical Network Operations,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. A274-A282, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Rekhter and T. Li, “A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4),” RFC 1771, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), 1995. [Google Scholar]
- J. Moy, “OSPF Version 2,” RFC 2328, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), 1998. [Google Scholar]
- N. Spring, R. Mahajan, and D. Wetherall, “Measuring ISP Topologies with Rocketfuel,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 2–16, 2004. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.