| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 15, 2017
II International Conference of Computational Methods in Engineering Science (CMES’17)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Computer Simulations Of Processes And Phenomena | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171503003 | |
| Published online | 15 December 2017 | |
Comparison of macroscopic descriptions of magnetization curves
Częstochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland
* Corresponding author: radoslaw@jastrzebski.info
The paper considers a qualitatively different behaviour of two phenomenological hysteresis models. The first one is the widespread Jiles-Atherton description, which is based on the ”effective field” concept. The other model is the proposal by the Brazilian research team GRUCAD. First order reversal curves simulated with the latter formalism do not exhibit negative slopes. This feature is in accordance with the experiment.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.